<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: manume</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=manume</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 22:35:24 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=manume" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by manume in "Herdr: One terminal to rule them all"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>More options: <a href="https://agentmgmt.dev" rel="nofollow">https://agentmgmt.dev</a> (disclaimer: built by me)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 13:55:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48832024</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48832024</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48832024</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by manume in "Show HN: The independent guide to agent orchestrators"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hmm, I don’t think sharing my personal experience would be that useful. For one, I’ve only used a handful of these tools long enough to give a meaningful assessment. More importantly, though, these tools evolve so quickly that anything I wrote would likely be outdated almost immediately.<p>I'd rather give folks an overview over which tools exist and some info about their popularity, price point etc.<p>Maybe it would be cool to add links to the founder's accounts on X, Youtube etc. where they share new releases and what they're working on...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 18:21:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077028</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077028</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077028</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by manume in "Show HN: The independent guide to agent orchestrators"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sure, but we gotta start somewhere, right? :)
What would you find most useful to add next?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 14:34:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48075308</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48075308</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48075308</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by manume in "Show HN: The independent guide to agent orchestrators"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I added a comment to Cursor in the list. ;)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 09:57:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073609</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073609</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073609</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by manume in "Show HN: The independent guide to agent orchestrators"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks for the feedback!<p>> Good list, but gosh the term "agent orchestrator" is really being diluted endlessly these days.<p>Yeah, there's a lot happening in this space... but I think those 13 tools which are one the list right now all try to do the same thing - make it easier to run multiple agents (mostly over multiple apps) at the same time.
Are there any tools you would add or remove?<p>> Also, putting Zed and Cursor in the same "freemium" bucket is really unfair...<p>Sure, the "free" plans of some of the tools are not really comparable, but I think that's out of scope for this list. :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 07:52:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072904</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072904</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072904</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Show HN: The independent guide to agent orchestrators]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hey HN!<p>I built AgentMGMT.dev today to keep track of all those agent orchestration tools that keep popping up. I've tried a few and landed on Superset, which I'm extremely happy (and productive!) with - but I think this category of tools will be extremely important and interesting in the next couple years, so it's worth keeping an eye on all available tools and how they evolve.<p>I will keep the site up-to-date, please help me by submitting new tools that are not yet in the list, or add any details that might help folks who are out shopping for their first/next agent orchestrator!</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48068896">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48068896</a></p>
<p>Points: 9</p>
<p># Comments: 7</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 21:17:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://agentmgmt.dev/</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48068896</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48068896</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by manume in "My Rails harness for autonomous AI coding with Claude Code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Really cool to see superpowers adjusted for Rails development!<p>One question: looking at the Rails conventions stills you added, wouldn't rules with paths be a better match for that:
<a href="https://code.claude.com/docs/en/memory#organize-rules-with-claude%2Frules%2F" rel="nofollow">https://code.claude.com/docs/en/memory#organize-rules-with-c...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 08:25:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47475507</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47475507</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47475507</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by manume in "Ruby: A great language for shell scripts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In my experience, Bundler has improved a lot with regard to resolving dependency issues over the years.
And OS libs are only really depended on by a few gems, no? 99% of them don't use FFI or call OS libs.<p>Moreover, how often do you really move a script to a completely different OS, where you don't know which OS libs are installed?
And wouldn't those missing OS libs also be a problem when writing the script in Bash or any other language?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2024 07:22:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765414</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765414</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765414</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by manume in "Ruby: A great language for shell scripts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hearing people still mention "monkey patching" always makes me chuckle...
I haven't "monkey patched" anything in Ruby in > 5 years, and I don't see it in any of the popular libraries/gems anymore either.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2024 07:14:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765371</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765371</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765371</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by manume in "Ruby: A great language for shell scripts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You can pin a gem to a specific version, of course.<p>`gem "mygem"` installs the latest version.
`gem "mygem", "~> 4.0.0"` installs >= 4.0.0 but < 4.1.0, which is what you probably want when using Semantic Versioning, which most gems adhere to, to get the latest patch version.
`gem "mygem", "4.0.10"` installs exactly that version.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2024 07:09:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765348</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765348</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765348</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by manume in "Ruby: A great language for shell scripts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For 99% of use cases (especially when writing shell scripts) it doesn't matter, just pick the one you know better. Both are nicer than Bash though. :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2024 07:04:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765324</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765324</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765324</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by manume in "Ruby: A great language for shell scripts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Can you give an example?
I can't think of a single situation where whitespace matters in Ruby (unless of course you forget to put a space between two commands or something silly).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2024 07:02:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765321</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765321</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765321</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by manume in "Ruby: A great language for shell scripts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What do you mean by "broken gems"?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2024 07:00:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765306</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765306</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765306</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by manume in "Ruby: A great language for shell scripts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Sadly, 9 out of 10 environments lack a Ruby interpreter out of the box.<p>Please name those 10 environments you are talking about.
In my experience, a reasonably recent Ruby version is present almost everywhere.<p>> add 5 minutes to your docker build<p>Why on earth would it take 5 minutes to install anything?
If you install Ruby through a package manager (it's present in pretty much all of them: <a href="https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/installation/#package-management-systems" rel="nofollow">https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/installation/#pac...</a>) it takes only seconds.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2024 06:58:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765300</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765300</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765300</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by manume in "Ruby: A great language for shell scripts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Similar case for me, but I think the author says it well:<p>> That is, most of the cases Bash for me is enough, but if the script starts to become complex, I switch to Ruby.<p>Even if ChatGPT lets you bang out more complex shell scripts easily, if you have to come back to it later on to fix an error or add a new feature, it's really hard to understand it (if you don't deal with such scripts on a daily basis).
If you start with Ruby (or Python or similar) from the beginning, it's much easier to understand and extend later on.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2024 06:52:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765276</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765276</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765276</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by manume in "Ruby: A great language for shell scripts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Bundler inline works great for that: <a href="https://bundler.io/guides/bundler_in_a_single_file_ruby_script.html" rel="nofollow">https://bundler.io/guides/bundler_in_a_single_file_ruby_scri...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2024 06:40:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765235</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765235</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765235</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by manume in "Ruby: A great language for shell scripts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> but it's temperamental and I have trouble getting it working.<p>> I was trying to set up editor support<p>Not sure what problems you had exactly, but saying that editor tooling is bad, simply because you can't get it to work, is not fair.
I've been using the LSP from Shopify since it came out, it works great, is very stable and updates come in on a regular basis.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2024 06:39:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765227</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765227</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765227</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by manume in "Ruby: A great language for shell scripts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> ... the new LSP one from Shopify doesn't want to work for whatever reason.<p>Sorry, but calling it "a mess" simply because you can't get it to work is quite unfair.
I've been using the LSP from Shopify since it came out, it works great, is very stable and updates come in on a regular basis.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2024 06:36:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765215</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765215</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40765215</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[How to run an efficient two-person company]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://uplink.tech/blog/how-to-run-an-efficient-two-person-company/">https://uplink.tech/blog/how-to-run-an-efficient-two-person-company/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25383886">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25383886</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:31:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://uplink.tech/blog/how-to-run-an-efficient-two-person-company/</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25383886</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25383886</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Check your recruiter contracts with Uplink]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://uplink.tech/blog/check-your-recruiter-contracts-with-uplink/">https://uplink.tech/blog/check-your-recruiter-contracts-with-uplink/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21224386">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21224386</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:57:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://uplink.tech/blog/check-your-recruiter-contracts-with-uplink/</link><dc:creator>manume</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21224386</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21224386</guid></item></channel></rss>