Apparently, both are against the US government's policy.

Queues are pretty similar.

Maybe the idea of complexity is too modern.

It may be fun to look at inputs and outputs, but it's not hackable and trying to map one into the other is more like astrology than a science.

It's not the first article I've read recently that is an ad for AI after a short context pretending to criticize it, with nothing connecting them.

And it's the one thing the LLM developers have been trying to fix for the last 2 years. Apparently, even at the cost of some other functionality. It's not like they can do it reliably.

Or, in other words, it's a joke.

I can believe the US/UK oil companies believe that.

It may even be true, because the energy transition caps the entire future opportunity for oil/gas sales, and all the producers have been trying to capture a larger share of that pie for the last 2 years or so.

But this intervention is so heavy-handed that it is visibly destroying that future market. It looks like all oil companies will lose a lot because of it, US/UK ones included.

> The Trump administration does not care about "its" population.

Yes, he's trying to govern like an oligarch. We will see in November if this was a good choice or if the US is still too democratic for this to work. Or earlier if he tries to avoid that test.

Or rather, when other countries say "sanctions", they are almost always talking about something completely different than the United States.

The jobs openings / unemployed close but a bit larger than 1 is the expected value when nothing is turning the economy completely upside down right now. It means there is no new shock that is too fast for people to adapt.

What is surprising, yes, because I could easily name half a dozen shocks that I would expect to see there. But it seems US people are adapting quickly right now, or things are canceling out.

If a company doesn't accumulate capital, it doesn't scale in complexity. It can grow by having more people do more of the same things, but it can't move into markets that demand anything complex.

But that's absolutely not what he's describing. He wants not to think about it, that's exactly the opposite of a disorder.

Anyway, an LLM assistant is also exactly the worst technology to use there, on every dimension.

And just like the other one, the people proposing those microlibraries knew what they were doing and had actually reasonable ideas. But masses of FAANG developers took it and run wild.

But it's famous for having collapsed after their IPO. It took 4 years to get back at the same nominal valuation (not inflation corrected), and after all the 2020s inflation it is still at 2x the initial price.