<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: marcusverus</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=marcusverus</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 22:08:43 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=marcusverus" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "The glass backbone: Why the Army's logistics will break in the next war"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>L̶a̶u̶n̶c̶h̶ ̶w̶i̶l̶l̶ ̶n̶e̶v̶e̶r̶ ̶b̶e̶ ̶p̶r̶i̶v̶a̶t̶e̶l̶y̶ ̶f̶u̶n̶d̶e̶d̶<p>̶F̶i̶r̶s̶t̶ ̶s̶t̶a̶g̶e̶ ̶r̶e̶u̶s̶e̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶i̶m̶p̶o̶s̶s̶i̶b̶l̶e̶.̶ ̶<p>̶F̶i̶r̶s̶t̶ ̶s̶t̶a̶g̶e̶ ̶r̶e̶u̶s̶e̶ ̶i̶s̶n̶’̶t̶ ̶e̶c̶o̶n̶o̶m̶i̶c̶a̶l̶.̶ ̶<p>̶M̶e̶g̶a̶c̶o̶n̶s̶t̶a̶l̶l̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ ̶i̶n̶ ̶L̶E̶O̶ ̶a̶r̶e̶ ̶a̶ ̶p̶i̶p̶e̶ ̶d̶r̶e̶a̶m̶.̶ ̶<p>̶S̶t̶a̶r̶s̶h̶i̶p̶ ̶w̶i̶l̶l̶ ̶n̶e̶v̶e̶r̶ ̶f̶l̶y̶.̶ ̶<p>Starfall will never happen!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 18:56:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850752</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850752</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850752</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "The labor share of income in the US is at its lowest post-war level"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you remove the word abject, the argument is:<p>> half of the US is living in poverty<p>This statement is also false.<p>> I encourage you to try to live on anywhere from $7 to $15 an hour<p>That's the bottom quintile, not the bottom half. The Median household income is $83,730, which would be more like $41.50.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 19:27:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48738018</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48738018</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48738018</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "The labor share of income in the US is at its lowest post-war level"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's actually far better than that! When people hear "poverty rate", they think "the percentage of people living in poverty". That's not what the census data on poverty is reporting, though. The census data is based on income only. It excludes in-kind welfare (Food Stamps, HUD, and Medicaid) and even excludes some welfare that is paid out in cash (like refundable tax credits). In other words, the census data is reporting that 10% of Americans <i>earn</i> under the poverty line. The number <i>living</i> under the poverty line is far, far lower.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 19:21:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737931</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737931</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737931</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "The labor share of income in the US is at its lowest post-war level"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The United States doles out >$30K/year in welfare spending for each person (not household, each <i>person</i>) under the poverty line. And that's just HUD/SNAP/Medicaid. The idea that any significant portion of the US is living in "abject poverty" (let alone half!) is hysterical in every sense of the word.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 19:11:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737813</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737813</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737813</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "Switzerland wil have a referendum to cap population at 10M"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"Don't leave us or we'll kill you" isn't the pro-EU argument you seem to think it is.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 15:32:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48462456</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48462456</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48462456</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "New Referendum Would Flip Brexit Result 10 Years On, Poll Finds"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ah yes, economists are famously capable of accurately projecting a decade in the future.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 18:00:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48448778</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48448778</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48448778</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "Nvidia partners with LG robotics to build humanoid robots in South Korea"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nobody has to condition me to see a useful robot as being worth 20K+. Being able to offload domestic labor would be a huge win. So would the more subtle benefits of living in a home that is always in pristine condition.<p>Once they're able to cook, they'll be in every middle-class household on earth.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 16:42:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48447688</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48447688</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48447688</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "Can the stockmarket swallow Anthropic, SpaceX and OpenAI?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>DCA</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 17:30:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373329</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373329</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373329</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "Green card seekers must leave U.S. to apply, Trump administration says"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The Democrat election messaging that caused border encounters to ~3X immediately after Biden was elected, obviously.<p><a href="https://archive.is/QKk0l#selection-923.73-930.0" rel="nofollow">https://archive.is/QKk0l#selection-923.73-930.0</a><p><a href="https://dgcjnpzq7j07id.archive.is/QKk0l/41e225be79dbd90e86c6bba94b4eed4b96456d1c.avif" rel="nofollow">https://dgcjnpzq7j07id.archive.is/QKk0l/41e225be79dbd90e86c6...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 23:56:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252842</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252842</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252842</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "Green card seekers must leave U.S. to apply, Trump administration says"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Democrats actively encouraged more than 10 million illegals to pour into the country during the previous administration. They lied about it and downplayed it for three years, and then (when election season rolled around) they talked tough about their plan to "seal the border"... which was another lie, as the bill they proposed would have allowed illegal immigration to continue at up to ~6X the historical average rate without requiring any action whatsoever to "seal the border". When the American people vote for mass deportations, those were called "fascism" and the basic enforcement of immigration law is actively, even physically opposed.<p>But an inconvenient process change has you clutching your pearls and crying "bad faith"? Yikes.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 20:57:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251446</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251446</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251446</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "Alberta to hold referendum on whether to remain in Canada"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> 10% of the population being able to put major policies to a referendum is a bit silly.<p>I think it's fantastic, actually. If the US had such a mechanism in place, we'd get term limits passed in a jiffy! In the absence of such a mechanism, the political class can simply refuse to act on popular measures. And while 10% might seem like a small number, the time, effort, and organization required to get 1/10th of the entire population to sign on for such a measure is actually a huge undertaking.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 16:29:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238122</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238122</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238122</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "Tennessee man jailed 37 days for Trump meme wins settlement after lawsuit"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I’ll cut against the grain here and say it’s ABSOLUTELY appropriate for taxpayers to pay the bill here.<p>It's one thing to agree that he should be compensated (I agree), but the figure doesn't make much sense. Per the article:<p>> During his stay in jail, Larry lost his post-retirement job and missed his anniversary — as well as the birth of his grandchild.<p>That's all pretty rough, but I fail to see how it entitles him to the lavish sum of $800,000. That's roughly half a lifetime's earnings for the typical worker!<p>> we need incentives for voters to take this stuff seriously.<p>I have a sneaking suspicion that setting public money on fire is not the best mechanism to achieve this outcome.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 21:59:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214791</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214791</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214791</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "US will start revoking passports for parents who owe child support"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Both can be true. Democrats tend to dominate the lowest income quintile, while Republicans tend to win the second and third quintiles. So if you're only looking at the bottom quintile, Democrats would win that cohort. If you combine the bottom three quintiles, Republicans would win it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 14:10:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063466</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063466</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063466</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "US will start revoking passports for parents who owe child support"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Who said anything about revoking drivers licenses?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 14:02:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063312</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063312</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063312</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "Only Elon Musk can fire Elon Musk from SpaceX, filing shows"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You have successfully rebutted my use of the word "mass". What about the substance of the argument?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:49:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47960224</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47960224</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47960224</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "Only Elon Musk can fire Elon Musk from SpaceX, filing shows"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This rude reddit stuff, this snarky ignorance-as-an-argument junk, is just so demeaning.<p>The role of the entrepreneur is to organize labor and capital in pursuit of their goals. The achievement of said goals can obviously be attributed to the entrepreneur.<p>Try anchoring your arguments in facts--in reality. Make assertions. Form syllogisms. Word games are for children.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 18:35:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47952489</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47952489</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47952489</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "Only Elon Musk can fire Elon Musk from SpaceX, filing shows"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The first catch of Super Heavy by the chopsticks was 18 months ago. Tesla started mass production of a dedicated, steering-wheel-free robotaxi five days ago. The first flight of the new Raptor 3 engine should happen any day now.<p>Elon is doing amazing things on a regular basis. What would drive someone to pretend otherwise?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:55:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47950180</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47950180</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47950180</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "If America's so rich, how'd it get so sad?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The definition of usury hasn't changed in 200 years.<p>From Webster's 1828 Edition:<p>U'SURY, noun s as z. [Latin usura, from utor, to use.]<p>1. Formerly, interest; or a premium paid or stipulated to be paid for the use of money.<p>[Usury formerly denoted any legal interest, but in this sense, the word is no longer in use.]<p>2. In present usage, illegal interest; a premium or compensation paid or stipulated to be paid for the use of money borrowed or retained, beyond the rate of interest established by law.<p>3. The practice of taking interest. (obsolete)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 14:01:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47890454</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47890454</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47890454</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "Smoking ban for people born after 2008 in the UK agreed"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There is something insidious about the state forcing a citizen to pay for its services, only turn around and insist that the use of said services entitles the state to further control of the citizen.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 16:57:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47851407</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47851407</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47851407</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by marcusverus in "US appeals court declares 158-year-old home distilling ban unconstitutional"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Only if it could be done in an apolitical way, which seems impossible in the current political climate. The legitimacy of the US Federal Government depends on the perceived continuity of the (now mythical) constitutional order. If one party or the other packs the court <i>without bipartisan support for their nominees in the Senate</i>, it would be denounced by the other as an authoritarian end-run around the constitution--as a revolutionary rather than a mere procedural act. IMO this would be more likely to foment disunion than it would be to restore the bygone constitutional order.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 17:06:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47768309</link><dc:creator>marcusverus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47768309</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47768309</guid></item></channel></rss>