I agree on the money concentration (as we already see it happening) but we could argue that once we reach a very high level of money concentration, people won't be able to use it to live so money doesn't hold value anymore and won't be accepted as a way of payment anymore. Which means AGI owners, will effectively be able to build anything they want theoretically but won't be able to fund anything in reality because people won't trust nor use their payment method, which would mean that even if AGI give what the ones building it promises, it will still move towards the economy collapse scenario

Anyway, the good thing with human mind is it can explore, where a LLM is statistically producing words. It will certainly produce average stories, which if they are short will be better than most human writing. But it won't explore new ways of writing, which are the ones which can become a masterpiece IMHO

I would be interested in long stories experiments though, is the context wide enough to keep consistency and mid quality or are they becoming boring and un-readable like claude can be when trying to explain a concept ?

Then starts the philosophical questions : If a human need to write world rules, names, locations, characters, psychology, how each character perceive the world despite its rules, define relationship between characters and then delegate the story writing to a LLM, how much of the story belong to the human and what's the difference between doing this and hiring a ghostwriter

I won't read your content, you have no credibility to my eyes because of your horrible UX.