<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: martinclayton</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=martinclayton</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 15:32:29 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=martinclayton" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by martinclayton in "Nearest Pint"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Dataset does seem sketchy.  My village has two pubs, neither appear.  Two non-pub licensed locations (social club, stately home) do appear.  The dot for the pub in the next village is off by about 100m.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 11:12:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49242166</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49242166</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49242166</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by martinclayton in "App Store Rejection of the Week: Dark Hours"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The words astro-nomy and astro-logy are similar, but this is no "fluke".<p>There's a Wikipedia article with some history: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrology_and_astronomy" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrology_and_astronomy</a><p>I imagine astronomers have been sighing resignedly at dinner parties for a couple of millenia:<p><i>In the Hellenistic world, the Greek words 'astrologia' and 'astronomia' were often used interchangeably, but they were conceptually not the same.</i><p><i>In his compilatory work Etymologiae [c. 625], Isidore of Seville noted explicitly the difference between the terms astronomy and astrology (Etymologiae, III, xxvii) and the same distinction appeared later in the texts of Arabian writers.</i></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 22:44:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49217136</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49217136</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49217136</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by martinclayton in "The difference between "today's task" and "accretive work""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No mention of <i>chikenized</i> reverse-centaurs in this piece?<p>I find these neologisms helpful as they quite precisely capture the intended meaning and are easy to remember.  Doctorow is an impressive and entertaining communicator, and being an author he needs to market himself and his work, so fair play to him for trying to score a hit follow up to "enshittification".<p>The earliest use of "centaur" in this sort of context I know of is Kasparov's advanced chess idea from the late 1990s: <i>"a bad (chess) player with a good computer program will always beat a good player with a bad program".</i>  How far we travelled since then...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 11:18:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48830472</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48830472</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48830472</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by martinclayton in "David Hockney, Who Restored the Human Form to Art, Dies at 88"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>His work with photography influenced my thinking in the 1980s.  The ideas of viewing time and moving focus I think are significant in human experience.<p>He talks about it, and you can see some of these works in a YT vid here:<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rz5vWgKy2Sc" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rz5vWgKy2Sc</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 13:17:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48503749</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48503749</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48503749</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by martinclayton in "World Capitals Voronoi"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Dublin knabs a decent chunk of Great Britain, Copenhagen gets southern Sweden. Seems fair.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 23:27:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48484191</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48484191</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48484191</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by martinclayton in "Michael Burry says neither SpaceX nor Anthropic is worth $1T"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars for listing.  But they make money from the trading and associated services they facilitate, hence the desire to have the largest most liquid stocks.<p><a href="https://resourcehub.bakermckenzie.com/en/resources/cross-border-listings-guide/north-america/nasdaq/topics/fees" rel="nofollow">https://resourcehub.bakermckenzie.com/en/resources/cross-bor...</a><p><a href="https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/050515/how-nasdaq-makes-money.asp" rel="nofollow">https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/050515/how-n...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 13:42:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370171</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370171</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370171</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by martinclayton in "Michael Burry says neither SpaceX nor Anthropic is worth $1T"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah, indeed.  See (march) <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/new-nasdaq-rules-include-fast-entry-new-listings-benchmark-index-2026-03-30/" rel="nofollow">https://www.reuters.com/business/new-nasdaq-rules-include-fa...</a><p>Quote from Cameron Lilja, Nasdaq's global head of index solutions:<p><i>"It is not necessarily representative to  have a company that's big and could have a sizable representation in the index to keep them out for that long," Lilja said in an interview. "We're seeing share and  corporate structures change - and companies that are staying private considerably longer are thus growing to be truly mega-cap companies before they even come to the public markets."</i><p>There's been fewer IPOs recently so Nasdaq and competitors are all racing to woo the few big ones to list with them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 12:28:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369353</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369353</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369353</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by martinclayton in "Michael Burry says neither SpaceX nor Anthropic is worth $1T"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What's the rationale offered by NASDAQ for their new "15-days and you're in the index" rule for these massive IPOs?<p>Seems equivalent to removing road safety rules for the least-tested, most-powerful new vehicles only.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 11:26:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368785</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368785</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368785</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by martinclayton in "Michael Burry says neither SpaceX nor Anthropic is worth $1T"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>(Agreeing with you) In the 1980s Gary Shilling said:<p><i>The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.</i><p>A long-term principle that I think does still apply.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 11:16:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368700</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368700</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368700</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by martinclayton in "Laws of Software Engineering"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This resonates with "the bitter lesson" somehow, interesting...<p>...On reading more it seems of use primarily in adversarial situations, so not-so-much resonant.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:16:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47860617</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47860617</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47860617</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by martinclayton in "AI for American-produced cement and concrete"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Wet cement is kind of sloppy, so this makes some sense.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 17:58:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604262</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604262</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604262</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by martinclayton in "Voith Schneider Propeller"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>See also <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26339421">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26339421</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 12:31:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47073084</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47073084</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47073084</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by martinclayton in "Show HN: A free online British accent generator for instant voice conversion"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was expecting regional accent options, so disappointed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 13:50:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46988807</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46988807</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46988807</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by martinclayton in "xAI joins SpaceX"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm pleased that Blue Origin and others are making progress on reusable flight hardware, because I fear that SpaceX will itself suffer a "RUD" for non-engineering reasons.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 09:44:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46868810</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46868810</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46868810</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by martinclayton in "Show HN: The HN Arcade"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Added mine ... let's see... <a href="https://foximax.com" rel="nofollow">https://foximax.com</a> (word puzzle)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 14:13:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46795670</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46795670</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46795670</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by martinclayton in "Let's Decrypt dot org redirects to the NSA"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Seems Let's Encrypt also have control of <a href="https://letsdecrypt.org" rel="nofollow">https://letsdecrypt.org</a>.<p>It takes you to <a href="https://www.nsa.gov" rel="nofollow">https://www.nsa.gov</a> rather than Let's Encrypt home.<p>Conspiracy? I think not, but others might.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 11:41:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46216641</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46216641</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46216641</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Let's Decrypt dot org redirects to the NSA]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://letsdecrypt.org">https://letsdecrypt.org</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46216640">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46216640</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 11:41:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://letsdecrypt.org</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46216640</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46216640</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by martinclayton in "10 Years of Let's Encrypt"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Seems Let's Encrypt also have control of <a href="https://letsdecrypt.org" rel="nofollow">https://letsdecrypt.org</a>.<p>It takes you to <a href="https://www.nsa.gov" rel="nofollow">https://www.nsa.gov</a> rather than Let's Encrypt.<p>Not sure what to make of that!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 11:18:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46216492</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46216492</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46216492</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by martinclayton in "What influence has the BBC had on history?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://archive.is/fbKl4" rel="nofollow">https://archive.is/fbKl4</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 11:11:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45991420</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45991420</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45991420</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by martinclayton in "What influence has the BBC had on history?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>An aside:<p>I always understood that Broadcasting House was inspiration for Room 101 (Ministry of Love) rather than the MoT.<p>It's well-known that the University of London Senate House building was the inspiration for the Ministry of Truth.  Both the interior and exterior have appeared in many films and TV shows.  Seems to come out of the visual creative toolbox when there's a need to evoke oppression or technocratic stultification through architecture, which is a shame as it's rather nice to visit!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 11:02:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45991376</link><dc:creator>martinclayton</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45991376</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45991376</guid></item></channel></rss>