>Advertising wondrous things.

This line bangs

Very topical example of why these "benevolent censorship" schemes are are worse than the problem they are trying to fix.

Large, also reusable containers.

That was debunked this summer.

Distributing sexual images of someone without their consent is a clear crime against that person. Children can not consent.

For a role like this, where outsized skill of someone who is and needs to be elite should be rewarded with enormously outsized pay, I think this a good model.

Suppose your company also has a team that inspects public bridges to make sure they don't collapse.

Is it really altruistic, or given your market share is it a cost of business?

Marked down for spreading alternative facts.

Losing an argument? Better accuse the other side of being paid shills.

Better have the The Verge write a puff piece on them.

The oil field boom in ND didn't have a problem getting skilled workers from across the country to live in tents because they paid them well.

They AL farmers are not worried about finding workers, they want to lowball American laborers so they can throw their hands the air and claim that they need a supply of immigrants laborers, which they can exploit.