But, I guess, "resulation" may be a bit blotchy for a sign of humbleness. :-)

(You're welcome anyway. And yes, I think, it's the sort of quirky article, an LLM can't come up with.)

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254236

Points: 150

# Comments: 30

> AI tools are pure rationalists, and are solely capable of reasoning.

Mind that the world isn't in the language, nor our connection with the world. (We know this for about 120 years, since we expelled the referens from linguistics.) Which brings us back to the synthetic judgement a priori… You may emulate this, as a superficial trait drawn from other traces of communication, but it's not what this is all about. E.g., I wouldn't expect true "lateral thinking" from an LLM output.

> My biggest fear from AI…

I'd add to this, it's not just empirical vs rationalist epistemology, it's also about empathy, anything referring to the conditio humana, which is really what any text is about, even a scientific one (why is it that we do want to know, what are the motivations, the regulating circumstances, etc.?).

The very purpose of text is to transfer meaning, concepts, observations and complex thoughts to human readers for them to process. And we have built a complex framework around this and for this. The fact that many feel that this framework is violated should hint at there being a problem, a conceptual discrepancy. (And be it just that there's a man-in-the middle, who hasn't authorship, standing in between me as an author and those receiving what remains of the text. In its essential lack of agency, it's less of a mediating recommendation and more of an appropriation. But, maybe, if we're talking about a slip into a new dogmatic slumber, manufactured via an unseen authority that hasn't any authority nor position as an author, the problem goes deeper than this. And, maybe, the masquerading of LLM output as human cummunication and phrasing is part of the problem.)

(We may observe how the implementation of datalist reflects this: it's still a simple textbox, i.e. input element, and the list is attached as an add-on, rather than being a list type of its own. It's not a list standing on its own, but an enhancement to the input field. So, rather don't use it as a control element for lists?)

PS: The point was really that, if you were to google "worst interface element", you got loads of articles about the combobox.

(We can even observe this in the resulting text: we immediately grasp the level of competence of the author, just by the way they take their path trough and at the matter. With LLMs, well, there's this even temperature, ready-made feeling, regulated by probability thresholds and RLHF sanctioned phrasing, also known as "slop" – even rhythmic intensifications, like "not this, not that, but…", which is actually a figure for a synthetic construct, don't help –, since the text isn't the trace or product of an actual organized thought – or, at least, an attempt at an organized thought.)

PS: "empirical a priori judgement" was meant as translation of synthetisches Urteil a priori (Kant). I.e., our ability to mentally prove concepts like congruency, which are not a priori, but can be inferred without regression to empirical knowledge. Typically, this requires both our inner sense (time, sequence, etc.) and outer senses (space, configuration, etc.)

Edit: One of the possible outcomes may be living in a world like in "Them" with glasses on. Since no expression has any meaning anymore, the message is just there being a signal of some kind. (Generic "BUY" + associated brand name in small print, etc.)

User enters German date "1. April"

MS Word: new ordered list with item "April"

User furiously hits delete key.

As it happens, this is how it was for years and years, actually, for most of the existence of the Web. The basic appearance of form elements used to be un-styleable, locked to the OS UI-appearance, for general usability concerns.

You are right, of course this is your account name! Do you want me to be keep you logged-in?

> _

Here's an easy three-step plan to unanimous democracy:

• ask your LLM

• don't edit — the LLM has already selected the most average and most plausible opinion for you

• give it your voice, your voice matters

Learn to anticipate — there may not always be a power bank to keep your phone from running low!