<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: mathattack</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=mathattack</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 19:34:10 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=mathattack" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mathattack in "Beware Management Consultants"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes.  Especially true when the results are unpopular, and contrary to the internal message.<p>“Accenture tells us we have 50% more middle managers than our peers” or “Bain tells us our customers don’t like us despite the internal CSAT scoring”</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 15:06:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49362621</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49362621</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49362621</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mathattack in "OverpAId – Fire your CEO. Hire the future"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Also a single person for the board to hold accountable.  In essence the individual that represents the company to outside groups.<p>It doesn’t have to be this way.  Other working cultures have adopted committees as the top.  Is is the dominant form in US shareholder capitalism.<p>The original post is surely satire.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 15:12:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49008093</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49008093</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49008093</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Roman Empire GDP per Capita Map Shows That Romans Poorer Than Countries Today]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://brilliantmaps.com/roman-empire-gdp/">https://brilliantmaps.com/roman-empire-gdp/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48929919">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48929919</a></p>
<p>Points: 5</p>
<p># Comments: 3</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 03:07:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://brilliantmaps.com/roman-empire-gdp/</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48929919</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48929919</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mathattack in "IBM is on pace for its worst day ever"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They were ahead of the industry in Marketing but not in reality.<p>Having AI and an army of consultants is the market standard today. This is because it works.<p>IBM slapped Watson on everything, and claimed a ton of revenue.  In reality they had a bunch of customers who hated them for decades of broken promises.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 18:53:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925445</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925445</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925445</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mathattack in "IBM is on pace for its worst day ever"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This shouldn’t surprise anyone who has dealt with IBM over the past 10-20 years.<p>1 - IBM audits your company’s software usage.<p>2 - They find a couple servers that someone forgot to turn off a decade ago that nobody uses.<p>3 - Since it was found in an audit “you’ll lose the 90% discount” and they present the CFO with a $20 million bill.<p>4 - “It pains us to have to enforce this MSA that your predecessors signed 20 years ago. In the spirit of partnership we can make this go away with a $2 million Watson purchase.”<p>5 - You get the Watson subscription which you don’t dare turn on.<p>6 - IBM touts the growth of AI to Wall Street [0] and fires a bunch of old people [1].<p>Of course this wasn’t going to end well.<p>[0] <a href="https://www.constellationr.com/insights/news/ibm-q4-better-expected-watsonx-gains-traction" rel="nofollow">https://www.constellationr.com/insights/news/ibm-q4-better-e...</a><p>[1] <a href="https://www.publicjustice.net/federal-court-boston-ibm-age-discrimination-adea-eeoc/" rel="nofollow">https://www.publicjustice.net/federal-court-boston-ibm-age-d...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 18:49:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925386</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925386</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925386</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mathattack in "StubHub, CEO hit with ‘deceptive practices’ class action over mass scalping"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In addition to what others say, the potential for profiting later increases the initial price.<p>Think of it this way… let’s say two identical companies are going to IPO.  Company one you can sell the shares for a profit later if you like.  Company two you can only sell for the price you bought.<p>Which will have the higher IPO price?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 03:01:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48915725</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48915725</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48915725</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mathattack in "IBM stock drops the most since 1987"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This shouldn’t surprise anyone who has dealt with IBM over the past 10-20 years.<p>1 - IBM audits your company’s software usage.<p>2 - They find a couple servers that someone forgot to turn off a decade ago that nobody uses.<p>3 - Since it was found in an audit “you’ll lose the 90% discount” and they present the CFO with a $20 million bill.<p>4 - “It pains us to have to enforce this MSA that your predecessors signed 20 years ago. In the spirit of partnership we can make this go away with a $2 million Watson purchase.”<p>5 - You get the Watson subscription which you don’t dare turn on.<p>6 - IBM touts the growth of AI to Wall Street [0] and fires a bunch of old people [1].<p>Of course this wasn’t going to end well.<p>[0] 
<a href="https://www.constellationr.com/insights/news/ibm-q4-better-expected-watsonx-gains-traction" rel="nofollow">https://www.constellationr.com/insights/news/ibm-q4-better-e...</a><p>[1] <a href="https://www.publicjustice.net/federal-court-boston-ibm-age-discrimination-adea-eeoc/" rel="nofollow">https://www.publicjustice.net/federal-court-boston-ibm-age-d...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:19:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48914675</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48914675</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48914675</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mathattack in "StubHub, CEO hit with ‘deceptive practices’ class action over mass scalping"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The price tickets sell for will be higher if scalping exists.  Demand increases for 2 reasons:<p>1 - I’m more likely to buy a ticket or pay a higher price if there’s a chance of turning a profit if I can’t go.<p>2 - Speculators are more likely to buy unused inventory if they can turn a profit.  This increases total tickets sold.  (Scalpers get paid for taking risk)<p>I’m not defending this.  I’ve given up on concerts for my favorite larger bands due to sticker shock.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:07:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48914581</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48914581</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48914581</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[IBM stock drops the most since 1987]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/article/ibm-stock-closes-down-more-than-25-after-preannounced-earnings-results-150605880.html">https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/article/ibm-stock-closes-down-more-than-25-after-preannounced-earnings-results-150605880.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48914549">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48914549</a></p>
<p>Points: 9</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:01:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/article/ibm-stock-closes-down-more-than-25-after-preannounced-earnings-results-150605880.html</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48914549</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48914549</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mathattack in "The Art of Computer Programming by Donald E. Knuth"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And he closes [2] with “May the force be with you”<p>Very interesting that he seems to be in the camp of “It’s ok if the machines prove it as long as we can understand and formally verify it after.”</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 16:08:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819776</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819776</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819776</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mathattack in "Ford AI hiccups push carmaker to rehire ‘gray beard’ inspectors"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m not sure I follow.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 10:51:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48685074</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48685074</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48685074</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mathattack in "Ford AI hiccups push carmaker to rehire ‘gray beard’ inspectors"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You’ve hit on a big reason - short term gains.  The partners at Accenture, Infosys and the rest circle the execs at old industry companies.  The companies start performing worse, though nothing some accounting gimmicks can’t cover.  Then they have a very bad quarter, enough that it will ruin their fiscal year.  Fingers start pointing, and talk turns to “belt tightening” and “turning fixed costs to variable.” All of a sudden the proposals from Big Consulting that provide savings bankable this fiscal year sound very good.<p>It doesn’t take long for the cracks to show:<p>- Not enough program/project management.<p>- An intuition that service dropped but no good metrics.<p>- Retrain the outsourcers after the first team quit.<p>- Inability to size new projects.<p>- Shadow IT departments form in the business units.<p>- The outsourcers don’t care about things like vendor consolidation or holding other vendors feet to the fire.<p>All of this might still be worth it if it’s done strategically to improve a chronically underperforming IT department. It’s rarely effective when rushed to cover up poor performance of the core business.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 17:35:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676755</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676755</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676755</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mathattack in "Ford rehires 350 engineers after AI fails to preserve expertise or train juniors"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Interesting as companies like Ford like to show they’re on the leading edge of AI, but do they really have the capabilities and 10x engineers?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 16:53:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676156</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676156</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676156</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mathattack in "Big Tech is borrowing like never before"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sort of.  They can use the debt to grow, in which case they’re betting that they will get more profit than the principal plus interest payments.  (Beating a 4% return on the loan, not the whole company)<p>They could also use it to change the capital structure buying back shares. This simultaneously increases risk and share price, unless the reissue more shares.<p>In both cases, if they can’t pay the interest payments, the company gets handed over to the creditors.  Not an issue for Google, but a lot of startups struggle with venture debt.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 18:34:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621374</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621374</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621374</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mathattack in "Big Tech is borrowing like never before"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It’s not just yield.  Its debt gets paid first.  And if you miss the interest payments the debt holders get the company.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 17:00:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610813</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610813</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610813</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mathattack in "Big Tech is borrowing like never before"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you’re profitable and can pay it back, it’s better than equity.<p>If there’s any financial risk then it may not be worth the potential loss of control.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 16:23:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610468</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610468</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48610468</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mathattack in "Rio de Janeiro's "homegrown" LLM appears to be a merge of an existing model"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes.  Though even more than the US, their engineering talent from top schools heads into consulting and finance.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 03:07:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48536110</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48536110</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48536110</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mathattack in "Waymo Premier"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I couldn’t believe this the first time I heard it.  This isn’t new, it goes back to the 90s.  Perhaps longer.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 04:08:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48499808</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48499808</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48499808</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mathattack in "The best relationships are all-encompassing."]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>He’s writing satire about AI, no?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 16:45:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48436506</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48436506</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48436506</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mathattack in "Can we have the day off?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The question is are we more like farm workers who will be unemployed because of the farm or accountants who become much more valuable and high paid because of the spreadsheet?<p>And I am grateful for not working on a farm, it’s hard work!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 04:55:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304686</link><dc:creator>mathattack</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304686</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304686</guid></item></channel></rss>