<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: mattbaconz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=mattbaconz</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 09:35:44 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=mattbaconz" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbaconz in "Show HN: Apple's SHARP running in the browser via ONNX runtime web"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>2.4GB in browser is crazy. I’m curious whether quantization works here or if the model quality falls apart too much.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 01:48:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48017154</link><dc:creator>mattbaconz</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48017154</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48017154</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbaconz in "Anthropic Nerfed Opus 4.6 Before the 4.7 Launch"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The article splits three things: default behavior (adaptive thinking, effort), UI redaction of reasoning, and whether external benchmark charts are comparable. For people who live in Claude Code daily: did you notice the read-before-edit shift or more “edit without context” before 4.7, and was visible thinking part of how you debugged failures?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 04:15:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47813088</link><dc:creator>mattbaconz</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47813088</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47813088</guid></item></channel></rss>