<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: mattbuilds</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=mattbuilds</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:18:31 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=mattbuilds" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "We intercepted the White House app's network traffic"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No one put words in your mouth, they asked you a question. You are the one who made the initial comparison to B2C apps, so it seems like a fair question to me. Your comment implies that its standard and the app isn't doing anything out of the ordinary when I think most people would except an official government app to be held to a higher standard than the average B2C app.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 02:50:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596190</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596190</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596190</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "[dead]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yea clearly. There is nothing in here at all even worth discussing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 21:41:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495486</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495486</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495486</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "The Tiny Teams Playbook"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Got any evidence of this or is just vibes based?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2025 23:44:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45563144</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45563144</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45563144</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "Google AI Overview made up an elaborate story about me"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That’s a false equivalency, sorry that some of us think companies should actually be responsible for the things they produce.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 15:36:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45093585</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45093585</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45093585</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "Making games in Go: 3 months without LLMs vs. 3 days with LLMs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m not saying coding is easy, but when it comes to games it is the easy part. Lots of people can code, very few can make something actually fun. Knowing how to code (or how to use an engine/blueprints/visual scripting) is just the start. It’s like making films. Everyone can record some videos on their phone, but it takes much more than that to make something people want to watch.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2025 19:45:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45007118</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45007118</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45007118</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "Making games in Go: 3 months without LLMs vs. 3 days with LLMs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m sorry but the difficult part of making games isn’t the coding, it is making something that is appealing and enjoyable to play. An LLM isn’t going to help with that at all. How is it going to know if something is fun? That’s the real work.<p>Also the idea that a dev who could making a game in 24 hour would create something professional and polished in 3 days is a joke. The answer to “where are all the games” is simple: LLMs don’t actually make a huge impact on making a real game.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2025 17:16:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45005903</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45005903</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45005903</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "When did AI take over Hacker News?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I personally don't dismiss or advocate for AI/LLMs, I just take what I actually see happening, which doesn't appear revolutionary to me. I've spent some time trying to integrate it into my workflow and I see some use cases here and there but overall it just hasn't made a huge impact for me personally. Maybe it's a skill issue but I have always been pretty effective as a dev and what it solves has never been the difficult or time consuming part of creating software. Of course I could be wrong and it will change everything, but I want to actually see some evidence of that before declaring this the most impactful technology in the last 100 years. I personally just feel like LLMs make the easy stuff easier, the medium stuff slightly more difficult and the hard stuff impossible. But I personally feel that way about a lot of technology that comes along though, so it could just be I'm missing the mark.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2025 20:49:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44934825</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44934825</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44934825</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "Bootstrapping a side project into a profitable seven-figure business"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>True but if you are building it for yourself then you will still have something useful in the end. Chances are that you also probably enjoyed or took satisfaction in the process of building it. Also, if it is truly a passion project and not just attempt to make money, it’s probably more interesting than most of the stuff shared.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 11:53:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44508873</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44508873</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44508873</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "The unreasonable effectiveness of an LLM agent loop with tool use"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Got any evidence on that or is it just “vibes”? I have my doubts that AI tools are helping good programmers much at all, forget about “running circles” around others.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 04:12:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44001778</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44001778</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44001778</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "Mark Zuckerberg personally lost the Facebook antitrust case"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>According to your logic, a CEO should attempt to destabilize and influence the government's responsibility so they can maximize shareholder value. And guess what, that is exactly what happens in reality. You can't just simplify reality into rules like this because it leads to people using those rules as an excuse to skirt responsibility and make actual difficult decisions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 14:02:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43803715</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43803715</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43803715</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "Mark Zuckerberg personally lost the Facebook antitrust case"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That is not a moral obligation, it is in fact the opposite. It is a lie that people tell themselves and the world to allow themselves to make immoral decisions for their own benefit.<p>I’m not saying running a company is easy and I know that many gray areas exist in the decision making. I do think companies can exist, profit, and be a net good for the world. However, we need to remove the notion that the duty to shareholder profits is a moral duty. It’s a cowards way out of having to make actual difficult choices. It’s one of those things that sounds great exactly because it allows you do horrible things with no responsibility. It creates a system where you offload the effort and weight of your decisions. As long as you’re are acting in the interest of shareholders, you are in the clear. That’s a dangerous concept and the opposite of morality.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 12:35:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43803049</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43803049</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43803049</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "AI founders will learn the bitter lesson"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is it really the best approach though if we sink all this capital into it if it can never achieve AGI? It’s wildly expensive and if it doesn’t achieve all the lofty promises, it will be a large waste of resources IMO. I do think LLMs have use cases, but when I look at the current AI hype, the spend doesn’t match up with the returns. I think AI could achieve this, but not with a brute force like approach.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2025 12:50:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42673204</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42673204</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42673204</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "Stanley Kubrick did it his way"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Just to further your point, we are in a thread about Kubrick who did numerous book adaptations including Lolita, Dr. Strangelove, The Shining, and Clockwork Orange and this is just off the top of my head. Tons of directors adapt novels. Bringing the story to the screen is the skill.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:29:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40007484</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40007484</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40007484</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "My deployment platform is a shell script"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It’s funny because in my many years of development I don’t think I’ve ever encounter a “mess of shell scripts” that was difficult to maintain. They were clear, did their job and if they needed to be replaced it was usually simple and straightforward.<p>Can’t say the same for whenever the new abstraction of the day comes along. In my experience what the OP is saying is exactly my experience. The abstractions get picked not because they are best but because they reduce liability.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:04:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39990252</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39990252</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39990252</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "In Defense of Simple Architectures (2022)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The way I tend to look at it is to solve the problem you have. Don't start with a complicated architecture because "well once we scale, we will need it". That never works and it just adds complexity and increases costs. When you have a large org and the current situation is "too simple", that's when you invest in updating the architecture to meet the current needs.<p>This also doesn't mean to not be forward thinking. You want the architecture to support growth that will more than likely happen, just keep the expectations in check.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:59:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39443682</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39443682</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39443682</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "Ask HN: How do I stop overthinking personal project management?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've had similar things in the past. What was the case for me, and maybe for you is that I was using the idea of "organizing" and "planning" to procrastinate doing actual work. I was working on difficult problems and I felt like if I could just organize everything correctly, the results would fall into place. This isn't how it works though, you need to just do the work.<p>Organization and tools like that can be helpful for communicating and coordinating across a company, but at the individual level it's usually a waste of time. You don't need them. Remember, the whole point is to get work done. If organizing isn't moving you closer to your goal, it's not doing it's job.<p>My suggestion is to do what I do now.<p>One list: TODO.txt.<p>I put tasks in priority order and just work through them. Sometimes I write a note or an idea at the bottom, but that's it. No over complication. It only has what I need to get the next thing done and keep moving through my tasks.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2023 14:35:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37623604</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37623604</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37623604</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "What Silicon Valley “gets” about software engineers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The reason is growth. A sysadmin will make sure the lights stay on and the place doesn’t burn down, but they aren’t creating a new revenue stream. And when all these companies need to grow forever, they need to be creating new things, which developers do and sysadmins don’t.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2023 14:58:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37545685</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37545685</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37545685</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "Ex-Finance developers mock McKinsey's monitoring metrics"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Which is funny, because they aren’t very good at it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2023 00:32:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37530766</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37530766</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37530766</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "Silicon Valley faces a crisis of nonsense"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I mean he’s a mouthpiece for Thiel, not really that surprising. His livelihood depends on viewing the world in a very specific way.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 10:18:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37305512</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37305512</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37305512</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mattbuilds in "Striking the Right Balance: Over-Engineering vs. Under-Engineering Software"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Perfectly said, that was the exact point I was trying to make. I've seen so many bad decisions made in the name of "future proofing". The the future comes and you are fighting those decisions. I wonder if people switch jobs and projects so often they don't get to see the results of all that future proofing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 15:58:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37090173</link><dc:creator>mattbuilds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37090173</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37090173</guid></item></channel></rss>