<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: matusp</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=matusp</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 01:24:47 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=matusp" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "Navier–Stokes Lost in Translation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The top reply is already all you needed:<p>> the answer with many multi-threaded programs is often "no."</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 17:06:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50045368</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50045368</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50045368</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "Navier–Stokes Lost in Translation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Yeah, and if you re-run the same program with the same bug, it will fail the same way each time.<p>[Citation needed]</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 18:42:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50010151</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50010151</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50010151</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "“Math 2.0” will need to value mathematical progress more holistically"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> the models are going to be much better than us at that, too.<p>I wonder if this is true. The code produced by these models are not really getting any more elegant over time. On contrary, the models seem to be getting worse, often proposing really baroque architectures. You can use RL to optimize for correctness, optimizing the vibe seems much more difficult.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 06:41:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50002498</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50002498</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50002498</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "Navier–Stokes Lost in Translation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are bugs found in programming language implementations all the time. I guess you are switching to machine code, good luck.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 04:32:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50001831</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50001831</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50001831</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "Navier–Stokes Lost in Translation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why not always write machine code? Why use programming languages at all?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 16:46:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49995340</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49995340</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49995340</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "Sharing AI progress in mathematics"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The agents here very likely used search. On top of that, they have boundless patience and can quickly process top K hits to find what they need. This is exactly the skill that is super useful for finding various niche sub-proofs that can help you build the final proof. A human mathematician is not going to digest 1000 papers from a different sub-field to find the needle they want, not knowing if it is actually there. AI can do it in few hours.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:03:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49990116</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49990116</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49990116</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "US Forces Exit Iraq"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The Iraqi invasion if famous for how little nation building was planned really. The US troops went in, overthrew Saddam, and then they had not idea what to do next. Nobody was really thinking about how to rebuild after Saddam is gone.<p>The most salient motivation was (perceived) security. The US government was absolutely paranoid after 9/11 and they really did not want Saddam to continue ruling in Iraq.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 13:05:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49892553</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49892553</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49892553</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "Astra and Fable still hack on simple variants of alignment evals from 2025"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My guess is that the models are overtuned on coding troubleshooting. You can regularly see them overthinking anything when you ask them to code something these days, mulling over countless eventualities. This is an okay idea for software engineering, but it leads to extremely diverging behavior in many other cases.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 20:19:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49688262</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49688262</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49688262</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "Iran says it captured US submarine drone in Strait of Hormuz"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The problem is that empirically regime changes very rarely lead to stable liberal democracies. Yeah, a magical societal transformation according to exactly our standards sounds great to us. But that is not how this is going to end.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 16:25:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49629080</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49629080</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49629080</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "Mistral raises €3B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How much money are Europeans paying to US companies for AI services and how much are Americans paying to EU companies? I don't think it's a good idea to let billions of dollars go to other countries because you couldn't be bothered to build a competitive product.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 09:52:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49608062</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49608062</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49608062</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "Mistral raises €3B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a bottom feeder mentality. Europe has enough bright people and resources to truly compete in the AI race. There is something wrong when the only selling point is that it's local.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 06:45:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49606389</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49606389</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49606389</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "Mushroom hunting with LLMs: what can go wrong?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Mushroom pickers generally know only a handful of easy to distinguish types and only pick those. I would say that 99.9% of pickers will never get poisoned.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49541863</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49541863</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49541863</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "Continuous Diffusion Language Models (CDLM's)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I disagree with this. Decoders were absolutely dominant in 2020 for chat. GPT2 was considered too dangerous to release, and I remember scrambling to get on the GPT3 waitlist. It worked.<p>He's not talking about decoders, he's talking about auto-regression. Before ChatGPT, the dominant paradigm was fine-tuning BERT-like models.<p>> Before ChatGPT there really wasn’t much of a concept of pre-training and post-training.<p>Again, people spend years just post-training BERTs in various ways.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 05:26:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49505946</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49505946</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49505946</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "DiffusionGemma Technical Report"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There is no theory why the gap shouldn't be closed. At the same time, people are trying to make them work for years by now and it's never good enough. But they are competing with incredibly optimized architectures.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 05:52:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49384285</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49384285</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49384285</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "Patterns and problems in emerging multi-agent systems"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>To me, all these agent systems just look very stochastic. You have these agents that have some basic computer capabilities and they are producing semi-random actions that also affect the semi-random actions of other agents. It is funny to observe how this stochastic system works, but it does not seem very practical to me so far.<p>The recent OAI-HF hack seems very similar. You have bunch of random actors and eventually they by chance iterated to a series of actions that breached HF environment. I don't perceive this as a malignant artificial intelligence, I perceive this as dangerous stochastic system that can control buttons that can affect the outside world.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:08:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49320238</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49320238</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49320238</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "The Iran War Is a Whole New Level of Quagmire for the US"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The transformation from Roman republic to Roman empire was mainly about how the top-level government is organized. It was not about the relations with vassals/periphery. The Roman republic was as imperialistic as empire in this regard. In fact, most of the Roman conquering was already done when the republic ended.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 07:29:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49317708</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49317708</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49317708</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "How Claude's text watermarking works"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't know the details of their implementation, but in general, if the text is not watermarked, you will probably fail the test after a few tokens. If it is, you will have to run the entire text, or, you can just run it until you have some degree of confidence.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 08:54:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49308947</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49308947</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49308947</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "No one can afford to make Myst games anymore"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And when you are an investor, you must predict who is able to make a good game. What is the likelihood that a Myst-like will pay for itself. There is already a lot of Myst-likes on Steam, do players want more?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 14:50:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49222381</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49222381</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49222381</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "“Gravity is worth asking about”"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The minimalist approach is great until it isn't. You can cover 98% of use cases with a single button is a great motto, until you are in the other 2%. I often fail to find basic functionality in software today, because some smart product manager decided that nobody really needs it. For example, it is now often impossible to load all elements from a list and filter/sort it along basic properties.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:07:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49179535</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49179535</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49179535</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by matusp in "What Emily Bender meant by "stochastic parrots""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It is a good blog, not a good paper.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 17:24:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48807756</link><dc:creator>matusp</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48807756</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48807756</guid></item></channel></rss>