<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: mdaiWorks</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=mdaiWorks</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 02:53:53 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=mdaiWorks" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mdaiWorks in "U.S. appeals court upholds designation of Anthropic as supply chain risk"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This debate seems to be missng the bigger picture regarding dual-use technology. If the precedent is set that any 'terms of use' which restrict military app can be deemed a 'supply chain risk,' does that effectively mean no commercial software vendor can ever legaly impose safety gurdrails on their products if, they wantto sell to government contractors? How does this impact the future of open-source components that are widely used in defense software?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 00:15:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49851805</link><dc:creator>mdaiWorks</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49851805</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49851805</guid></item></channel></rss>