In any case ICC warrants are not public. Only state parties know the content of the warrants. We don't know what's exactly in them. Only PR is public.

Anyway, it sounded like you're arguing that ICC warrant is something OTP asks for willy nilly on suspicion of a crime. But there is a long prior process where even opening the investigation has to be approved by the chamber or asked for by a state party. Then there's investigation, which in this case was likely quite extensive and helped by third parties, given that just Pillay's UN commission of inquiry alone provided ~7000 pieces of verified evidence and that's just scratching the surface, given that several state parties refered the situation in Palestine to the court, including Palestine itself, court does its own outreach to victims, and I know several projects that periodically sent/d tons of data collected from social media where Israeli state itself publicly posted its massacres of hundreds of civilians per strike early on.

https://www.aljazeera.com/video/newsfeed/2024/6/19/never-see...

But it's still possible and useful to contribute (or to contribute to) complex well tested programs, that are just not reproducible in a weekend by a LLM.

Also organizing projects maybe in a form that makes them easy to reliably customize and extend by a LLM, if that's how the people will interact with open SW development in the future, may also be something useful.

Though I dunno what "complex" will mean in the future, if LLM can at the moment already write state of the art well tested C23 compliant re-targetable C compiler for various 16/8-bit MCUs, along with SW simulators, along with timing exact system verilog IP cores, for 5 different architectures, in two weekends on a cheap $100/mo. plan and it all just works. :) It's going to be hard.

And you don't know much about the ICC process and could not have observed it if you think warrant is step 1. It's like step 7. If you did not watch the process, you can still learn the ICC procedure from the rules of the court. It's all freely available on their website.

Also directly targeting foreigners who provide evidence to the court is also pretty clear evidence of american intention here. Hide their crimes. Several such human rights organizations were targeted independently of this for cooperation with ICC, like Al-Haq, Al-Mezan Center for Human Rights, and PCHR.

And I'd think he himself can't hack shit. :D

Or is there some other perspective, other than what Israelis can be observed as doing? I assume what I've seen is what Israel is like.

They wanted to level the city, they did. That's all. There was some fighting eventually with a few fighters holed in in Rafah, but nothing that would justify this. And Israelis continue leveling entire areas the whole year after so called "ceasefire" during which there were almost no attacks on them, yet they managed to murder more than a thousand of people.

I can also work on very fun things with computers now, that I'd just not even think of previously. I just love the idea of the program, but I'm not interested in learning details of how to implement it. Last such thing is teaching computer to dance and improvise Bachata to music. :) Yeah, I can spend months on details of 3D, or physics simulation, or skeleton animation, or things like that, but that's not what I'm interested in. I'm interested in the dance aspects itself and matchin to music, and lead-follow simulation (where the computer plans the lead actions to some extent, and follow is just a reactive machine with some degrees of impovisational freedom) and all the details of how the actual skeletons are visualized on screen I literally can care less about. All I care about is impairing knowledge of freedom of movement of lead and knowledge of freedom of what can be led while hands are connected or visually by what follow can observe and lead can signal through intentional movement, and not how the program will execute this.

Nothing like that existed previously, and I would not be able to get to fun interesting things without wading throught shit ton of uninteresting parts. But now I within a span of 24 hours have something that I can have a base implementation of a 3D dance lead/follow emulator with weight transfer, balance skeleton joint lead-follow hand connection weight trasnfer and ground connection based emulator that I can paly with emulating the dance on top of, and I can focus on the actual dance/music conenction, and tiny details that make the emulated dance look fun, surprising, natural, and fit Bachata style and playfulness.

Code is easier to look at/read that way. I skim the README, then read the code.

Otherwise code comments are just nuts and unmanageable, because there's no hard/enforcing feedback loop on those. They can contain anything, even non-sensical things, old information/decisions, history of development, wrong information, contradictory information, and code still compiles. There's no pressure to keep them in check.

Lint step that fails build if code contains long comments is also useful as a hard-constraint.

Not really. Let's say Meta banned all blacks from advertising on facebook tomorrow. That would run against federal law.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1981

But I wrote non-trivial code with sdcc regardless. My favorite 8051 targets are FX2LP USB boards from aliexpress. :)