But Paul Graham is right, you weren't meant to have a boss. In fact this is not unique to programmers either. Nobody is meant to have a boss.

I encourage everyone to read "The Dawn of Everything" by David Wengrow and David Graeber to understand the kinds of human organizational structures that are possible and have existed in the past.

The reason comparing to TCP, DNS doesn't make sense is this doesn't replace those at all. The reason I compared against other agent frameworks and things like MCP is because that's the common question people have.

You are right objects don't exist in a vacuum but you are wrong an object that just exposes a description and an LLM reading it from the outside does better. Think about object oriented programming, objects expose and interface but don't reveal all of their internals. Calling the Ask handler could change internal state. Maybe response depends on what object is asking. Maybe the Ask handler might want to call the callers Ask handler too. You can't do that by just exposing a description.

You said the goal is to ultimately transport data to a higher layer. That's not the goal. You are thinking too hierarchical. The relationships between objects is dynamic and the concept of a higher layer makes no sense here since the point is to get rid of the hierarchical nature current agent protocols have.

Keep in mind I built a working system to test the concept. You can download and try it.

I might be biased because I came up with it, but we are over complicating these systems. There is a simpler way, and it appears to work well since I built a system using it to test the idea.

Most of that spend is on infrastructure, GPUs, ASICS, and everything else that goes into a datacenter.

The fact that many states are now using it for funding purposes to get around the banking system further adds proof to bitcoin's potential origin.

Also, it doesn't help that Satoshi Nakamoto means basically central intelligence in Japanese...

I'm not saying Bitcoin was created by the government, but if it was there are signs...

Seems safebox went after a subset.

The sooner programmers start thinking about modeling the domain, user mental models, architecture and data structures and less focus on the mechanics of writing code, the better.

Writing code is the EASY part. LLMs have basically solved the easiest part of software development. They however are bad at all the stuff I mentioned. LLMs don't have a point of view, you do as a software developer.