Some of this depends if you’re playing the long game

First, being intelligent (as defined in the article) doesn't relate to being happy. There is nothing inherent about being intelligent that means happy.

Second, our society spends a lot of time shaping culture and people to extract value from them. For example, the focus on "more" rather than "enough". We are shaped to always desire more and never be content with what we have. Even intelligent people are shaped by this. Consider the fall in terms of people who have hobbies.

I think of verifiable images as something for legal purposes. So much is easily made up with AI. Having verifiable real photos (and eventually video) can be a benefit for things like legal proceedings.

1. Seed prices - there is a lot of patented GMO stuff in circulation and pricing around that.

2. Farm equipment - bigger equipment, more sensors and computers, higher costs (even around fixing things)

It would be great if there was some investigative reporting that covered all the angles.

If the issue is one of jurisdiction, did they file the case in the wrong court?

Following local news, I've seen the case where a case is closed because it was filed in the wrong court. A different court had jurisdiction in the matter. I wonder if that's what happened in this case.

This doesn't affect things like installing or upgrading a chart. Dependencies aren't updated at that time.

Some species of birds, like cockatoos, like puzzles. They like to figure things out.

Instead of doom scrolling on social media we called a friend.

Instead of binge watching another meh show, we had friends over to play cards or a board game.

Instead of over scheduling kids with constant activities, parents had a regular night out with friends while kids spent quality time at home with the other parent.

The time is there. It was in the past. We just have a finite amount of time and use it differently.

What’s happening with judges is very political. We likely won’t know what’s allowed until things have gone through the appeals process. There have been cases of judges admitting they will rule against the current administration no matter the topic or law. This is messy, to say the least.

Some previous attempts for DOGE to get data has resulted in data being deleted before they can look and requests for judges to block access to data.

DOGE may be trying to be covert in order to stop these two activities from happening before they can get and review the data.

Should the US be the one to handle the CVE database globally? The current administration wants to see other parts of the world help carry the load. A little scare could be the push needed to make this either distributed or handled by a coalition. This could be a positive for the US (who doesn't want to be the sole funder) and for those who don't want the US to have sole control.

The latest version is FIPS 140-3 and is more up to date.

Note, binaries made for FIPS 140 with OpenSSL dynamically linked do not run on Alpine. While I've not looked at the Microsoft go/openssl compiler, it's worth testing its output across distros/versions as different distros have different versions of glibc and openssl.

I wonder where those investors are on returns on that investment and the kinds of changes they want to get them.

The powers one level of government doesn’t take trickle down to the next. Since the state level took those powers, the local level cannot.

The representative government processes needs to happen at the state level in Florida.

The court is tasked with judging based on the laws at hand. If those laws are flawed or wrong but legal, it's upon congress to change the laws rather than the courts to decide right or wrong.

The court should be focused on legal or illegal. This is how the separation of powers work in the US.

When laws are "broken" we should be looking at congress.