Whether individuals inside the system are true believers or cynical operators, the response to calling out their methods will be identical:

If they genuinely believe the rhetoric: They will simply double down and say, 'Yes, and protecting the children makes this absolutely necessary.'

If they know it is a manipulation tactic: They will still reply with, 'It is for the children,' because they know it is an impenetrable PR shield that gets them their way.

In either scenario, the bureaucracy is entirely immune to the criticism.

Exposing the game might help persuade third-party observers, but it does absolutely nothing to stop the bureaucratic machine from using that exact same line to steamroll the agenda forward.

The immediate reply is the accusational: "why are you trying to trying to prevent safety for kids".

It's a simple next step to accuse you of hiding your own child abuse ring.

This sounds like hype, but it's the normal path here in Australian.

I really like it as I run a webdav service and can read/write and sync notes between multiple Mac desktops and Android. Encrypted while I am at it.

Markdown native.

Anyone smarter than a 10 year old would not we actually know almost everything about car design. How it works is not at all hidden. We have iterated on pretty much the same thing for 100 years. The current state is about efficiency, materials and manufacturing.

When you have deep knowledge and experience in a field you will get near 100%.

The single most important lesson from queuing theory for software systems is the non-linear relationship between utilisation and latency.

As system utilisation approaches 1.0 (100% capacity), the average waiting time does not scale linearly, it scales hyperbolically. A system running at 95% utilisation is vastly more fragile and slow than one running at 80%, even though the load difference is minor.

- Instant, zero-copy container cloning from images via Copy-on-Write. If you boot a new image like the existing ones it's seconds.

- Atomic, millisecond-level instance snapshots regardless of storage size

- Block-level container migration using native 'zfs send' and 'zfs receive', very short command lines and seems to work perfectly.

- Granular dataset nesting (every instance, image, and custom volume gets its own ZFS dataset). You can see every filesystem even on the host.

- Transparent, inline data compression (LZ4/ZSTD) enabled automatically per dataset. For services that don't change much, you might as well use a compressed image to make them even smaller.

- Mirroring / Raid

- Sub-volume sharing and direct management via native ZFS administration tools. If my home directory has a build area and a million files, I can just save time and put my home, pre cooked into a new machine and not copy or even rebuild on my new machine.

- Dedup keeps blocks with the same data as a reference. This costs a lot of memory and has not saved much for me as a lot of my images are similar and already shared I think, but it's cool.

It's pretty much like any new car as far as entertainment and maps. Plus, it's got physical buttons for everything else. I think recent cars may well be coming back to what I have on my old car.

ps. not mentioned, Anrdoid auto and Carplay are H264, later H265, video players with touch control and buttons in a return channel. The phones render the display internally and project it as video to the display. That's all. This is why much older generation displays with at least reasonable SOCs can run them near perfectly. They are not running Anrdoid themselves. In fact some of them are operating system-less SOCs that have nearly no firmware but a video player and the support for the touchscreen and buttons. Much like that crappy video player built into old TVs ten years ago.

I have them on my motorcycles too. It's way better than a phone, in that the user interface is designed to be less interactive and more focusses with larger buttons.

> Only extremely wealthy people participate in stock markets, in general. Other people use one of those wealthy people as an intermediary.

This confuses a retail investor with a Clearing Member. Anyone with a phone and a $10 brokerage account has direct, sub-millisecond execution access to US equity markets. Brokers are not wealthy patrons acting as gatekeepers, they are licensed utility providers providing the technical pipeline to the exchange, just like the power distributors who cable and sell you power. They are providing a managed service, being a direct link to the exchange. There are some platforms that are not DMA, direct market access, but there are numerous brokers who offer DMA. I personally don't trust non DMA access, but maybe for larger orders, it might be good to have a man in the middle as a service.

The graph on Google is a trade feed, the last traded price, not buys and sells. If you sign up to one of those discount brokers you have a feed of those buy and sell orders, the order book, live, not delayed like the google trades. No one gets the names of the people buying and selling until settlement. (How I know, I write that code that builds the order book and matches the orders for a living). Not even the brokers.

True large firms trade large orders amongst themselves so they can get a more stable price, but US regulators explicitly mandate real-time reporting for off-exchange and private trades. Once they trade a listed instrument they must report the trade within 10 minutes. Yes they do, this part is highly regulated, if they don't they will be penalised. It's also in their interest as the more pricing, the better the prices. (No conspiracies here, some people have broken the rules but the code is pretty easy to write to make sure this happens, I've worked on that too)

To use it is a whole different question, and not in any way related to job interviews. I have worked in places that are crazy for not using it and others where using it was even crazier.

An exponential/log function requires arbitrary clamping or offsets because you cannot represent pure black, 0, on a pure log scale without hitting negative infinity.

Basically, it fits better, aside from a good map of human perception