If we don't want to be writers, then we have to be editors. And editing is an entirely different job and it's not an easy one. In many ways it's harder.

Especially when LLMs love writing novels when all we need is a short story or less.

Works but not quite good enough to make the case against commoditization.

If open source or on-device AI gets good enough for 80% of consumers, then this stops being a consumer product and the only real market is people who need the high-end models. If those models are slow and expensive, certain tasks like scientific and math research can tolerate slowness, but they run up against the costs. If they're expensive, the tech industry can afford them but runs up against their inefficiencies.

We need to talk about how well these improving models work in multiple dimensions: Accuracy, performance and cost. All three have to improve considerably before the debate dies down.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/View_Transi...

https://view-transitions.chrome.dev

Best part about it is how gracefully it degrades.

On the other hand, Go code from 2012 and Go code from 2026 looks virtually the same. Conventions are respected, go fmt is the one single formatter, "use the stdlib" is a popular mantra and the code is readable by design.

If I were to codegen a project I wouldn't use anything but Go at this point.

Remote: Yes (open to frequent travel, PST preferred) or NYC hybrid.

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: SQL, Go, React/Typescript (plus AWS, Figma, and plenty more)

Resume/CV: https://michael.chisari.us/resume.pdf

Email: michael@chisari.us

--

Software Engineer / Founding Engineer

Not actively looking but always open to explore opportunities. Prefer startups, greenfield projects and true innovation. Generalist with deep experience that learns and moves quickly.

Skills will have to be built through artificial constraints. Pen & paper, reading books, not using AI, etc.

I can use AI for coding after decades of coding. I can't use it for theoretical physics because I can't evaluate the responses.

https://tombedor.dev/human-attention-and-human-effort/

"Suarez Miranda,Viajes de varones prudentes, Libro IV,Cap. XLV, Lerida, 1658"

- On Exactitude in Science by Jorge Luis Borges

That doesn't mean that simulated reasoning isn't useful, it's wildly useful. But a thing is not its simulation.

That said, you overestimate how much "colonizer" discourse informs the average suburban home or modern office environment. That discourse isn't even particularly dominant amongst the left (often clowned as "third-worldist", reductionist or class denialism).

The average leftists apartment or home has more in common with your great-grandfather's house than stark, modern minimalism.

The article doesn't touch much on why modern decor emerged as it did. It's a market response where everyone needs to (or feels the need to) pick up and move at a moment's notice. Companies are either expanding or like to think they'll be expanding soon. People move jobs so often that they have a hard time feeling settled where they are, so they design for that possibility. The modern aesthetic is one of planned impermanence.

I'm not making a judgement on what the ideal situation is, more so explaining why the referenced study could have come to its conclusion.