<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: micro2588</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=micro2588</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 02:22:57 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=micro2588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "Jolt: Clojure compiler implemented with Chez Scheme"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Really cool, I see now that most all the the Racket extensions to Chez have been up-streamed which is positive for the health of both projects.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:20:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49261470</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49261470</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49261470</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "Jolt: Clojure compiler implemented with Chez Scheme"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Awesome work, have you looked into using Racket's fork of Chez?  It supports some additional extensions and architectures from base Chez that would seem to beneficial as a compiler target, at least that was the case a couple years ago.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:02:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49261216</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49261216</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49261216</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "Letter to Governor Abbott on responsible AI infrastructure in Texas"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree I don't think it will always be the case but in the 1-5 year term the economics dictate that is what you get, full battery backup to run something like a data center is expensive even if technically feasible.  It is not 1:1 backup but significant additional marginal gas production is going to come online with battery and solar build outs, that is what you see in grid queues across the US.<p>You are ignoring the fact that batteries like many other flex grid assets have diminishing marginal returns to arbitrage power.  That is why you see them in composition with other flexible base load resources in a market system.  We could reform the system to have other objectives.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 16:23:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49260645</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49260645</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49260645</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "Letter to Governor Abbott on responsible AI infrastructure in Texas"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>During the Biden administration almost 40 trillion ft^3 of natural gas was produced annually breaking all records.  I do agree the policies of energy were more all the above during Biden and renewable build outs were incentivized additional to record gas production.<p>I think the biggest material factor between the two administrations is coal capacity factors on the grid are increasing again which would not happen under an alternative admin.  We were on a good path towards phasing out coal completely with natural gas and an increasingly  significant amount of renewable energy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 16:04:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49260389</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49260389</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49260389</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "Letter to Governor Abbott on responsible AI infrastructure in Texas"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As much as I wish it were different I think this would be the outcome under any administration.  Natural gas in the USA is just stupidly cheap inflation adjusted, is energy dense, power plants require few land resources, pipeline infrastructure exists, robust and deep supply chain, etc.  I don't hold much hope of the USA kicking the habit as it is such a competitive advantage.  If we don't burn it locally it will be exported at a huge margin for geopolitical advantage.  1/3 of the CO2 reductions in the US power sector are due to renewables, 2/3 are from natural gas. Renewables would need to be backed up by additional gas capacity, although the average capacity factor would be reduced with a more robust renewable build out.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 05:16:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49253663</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49253663</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49253663</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "Letter to Governor Abbott on responsible AI infrastructure in Texas"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Some of the largest proposed data centers in the US are in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Ohio.  The electricity infrastructure is important so is cheap natural gas from the Marcellus shale, natural gas pipeline infrastructure and relaxed regulations.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 04:45:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49253485</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49253485</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49253485</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "DeepMind's WeatherNext model achieves breakthrough forecasting cyclones"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Any advice will really depend on where you live and the dominant source of local error.  These are all good options for the US and if the one main source of error is near surface winds around complex terrain then you can also look into WindNinja from the National Forrest Service.<p><a href="https://ninjastorm.firelab.org/windninja/mobile/" rel="nofollow">https://ninjastorm.firelab.org/windninja/mobile/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:48:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49227300</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49227300</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49227300</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "DeepMind's WeatherNext model achieves breakthrough forecasting cyclones"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When you say runs that is an ensemble model forecast which is different than a deterministic model forecast.  Any type of weather model sensitive to initial input state errors will have outlier model runs.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:30:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49227209</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49227209</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49227209</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "DeepMind's WeatherNext model achieves breakthrough forecasting cyclones"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Traditional physics based weather models also rely heavily on physical parameterization for sub grid scale processes (think clouds, microphysics of rain sleet snow, etc) so even the deterministic physics models are learned approximations from data.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 18:38:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49224584</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49224584</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49224584</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "DeepMind's WeatherNext model achieves breakthrough forecasting cyclones"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>ECMWF has an experimental AIFS direct observational prediction model (AIFS-DOP) that has become competitive with their physics based IFS model on certain metrics just in the past year.<p><a href="https://arxiv.org/html/2606.19093v1" rel="nofollow">https://arxiv.org/html/2606.19093v1</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 18:16:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49224356</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49224356</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49224356</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "The Strongest El Niño Ever"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Heat domes are already killing off cattle and reducing crop yields, even in western countries?  There was significant cattle die off in the US during 2022/2023.  Europe just experienced 10,000 excess deaths due to heat impacts and a reduced grain yield by almost 8-10%.  There have not been correlated heat dome events over multiple regional bread baskets (yet) but those are going to get increasingly more probable.  We have a lot of adaptability on the food side though as reducing meat consumption is an easy behavioral change.  Climate change impacts is one reason why beef is currently so expensive in the US.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 02:08:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49064449</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49064449</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49064449</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "The Strongest El Niño Ever"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Its a bit more complicated than that, you have a period during the spring called the spring persistence barrier that makes skillful prediction of a developing el nino difficult.  What is impressive is that multi month model predictions before this spring barrier had a historic el nino developing which turned out to be correct (an out of sample prediction).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 01:53:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49064343</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49064343</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49064343</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "The Strongest El Niño Ever"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Funding was proposed by Congress during the Biden administration but didn't get a lot of press at the time<p><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/01/white-house-cautiously-opens-door-to-study-blocking-suns-rays-to-slow-global-warming-ee-00104513" rel="nofollow">https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/01/white-house-cautiou...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 01:45:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49064294</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49064294</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49064294</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "The Strongest El Niño Ever"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Its regionally complicated because increased tree cover can lower albedo (reflectivity of radiation) which offsets the co2 removal benefits.  Forrests can tip from co2 sinks to co2 sources which is happening in different regions of the world currently.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 01:36:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49064224</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49064224</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49064224</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "Data centers trigger voter backlash"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Being next to a nuclear power plant but attached to a regional grid is not that relevant in terms of total additive emissions from a data center build out. You have to look at the change in emissions of the grid as a whole. Companies are incentivized to care about disclosing a narrow boundary view of scope 1 & 2 emissions but we live in the real world not a spreadsheet.<p>US electrical emissions YOY increased in part due to data center build out and energy demand.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 00:46:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693932</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693932</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693932</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "Data centers trigger voter backlash"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The nuclear generating station is part of a larger system.  Say you build enough data centers in your local area to use up all the station power so that 80% is no longer exported, what is getting built somewhere else to make up for that missing generation the data centers now use?  Its not new nuclear. When you add data center load to a grid how the additional generation is supplied is really what matters in terms of impacts.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 23:36:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693416</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693416</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693416</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "Data centers trigger voter backlash"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It is much more than the Colossus sites, I would look at the capacity additions in the regional grids you are apart of and what is being funded to meet these increases in demand from data centers.  The majority of it is natural gas generation and a sizeable but minority amount of battery storage.  Just outbidding people for a relatively fixed amount of clean nuclear ignores the second order effects of adding large loads like these.  What happens in your area does have larger impacts.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 23:00:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693104</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693104</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693104</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "Data centers trigger voter backlash"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The amount of nuclear generation is roughly fixed (minus the refurbishment of three mile) in that region.  If you add additional large load to the grid and outbid other demand for that power you are just shifting the load you replaced to other sources, which in PJM region would be mostly gas (new or existing) and delaying the decommissioning of existing base load coal plants.  Renewables in that region are unfortunately a small percent of electrical generation.<p>I do agree that other demands like water consumption are overblown and could be largely regulated to enforce best practices.  What infrastructure we are building as a society to meet this load demand is going to be the lasting impact of this generational infrastructure investment and it's looking like that will be mostly fossil fuel based in the near to mid term.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 22:27:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692804</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692804</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692804</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "Data centers trigger voter backlash"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>But in PJM they are almost entirely being powered by natural gas and coal?  Even if you contract out power from a nuclear plant some other plant on the grid is now enjoying a higher capacity factor, at the margin natural gas.<p>The data center in question in Utah was marketed as a 9GW full build out natural gas facility more than twice the electrical generation of the entire state.  Coal electrical production in the US increased 13% last year.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 21:46:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692392</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692392</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692392</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by micro2588 in "The founder of Craigslist has given away half a billion dollars"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Of course it is, to be healthy you need to be born Mississippi is double the OCED average for infant mortality.  Then you can track obesity, diabetes, heart diseases, etc. throughout life.  The only area where all this supposed American exceptional wealth confers an advantage in healthcare is post op outcomes where higher penetration of CT / MRI scans can make a measurable difference.  Even then the difference is not large.  You don't get a DECADE of life expectancy difference without an objective difference in health.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 05:00:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48594929</link><dc:creator>micro2588</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48594929</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48594929</guid></item></channel></rss>