If you give a smart one a task, he will look for a way to do it with lowest effort. Probably most would do it but the smart ones will find way more the shortcuts, automations and exploits.

Edit: also smart people will more often ask "why" if a task makes no sense to them.

Just kidding. Of course there's doom for postgres: https://github.com/cedardb/DOOMQL (pure SQL) and https://github.com/DreamNik/pg_doom (extension).

Oh and there's https://github.com/snaplet/postgres-wasm that allows to run everything else in postgres ^^

I would even extend this: if you are bugged by an ad, avoid the product, the vendor and tell everyone why you do so. Also tell it to the vendor, why you avoid their product (aggressive, non blockable ads at facebook for example).

Edit: My state had a subsidy of 300€ when I bought mine, so the RoI was instant ;-)

I'm usually at 60-70% usage at the end of a 5 hour window, that's the pace where I can still think about what to delegate and what to expect and verify the results. Could probably go faster but that would have a significant impact on output quality.