<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: mikeortman</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=mikeortman</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 12:49:35 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=mikeortman" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[Show HN: The Epstein Library]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Inspired by the terrible search on the DOJ website, I created this project I've been working on over the last few days to modernize it. Slightly different than sites like JMail (which I highly recommend others play with too, super cool), I primarily focusing on both visual search, text semantic search, and full text search of all documents. Wanted to share the progress so far.<p>Any and all constructive feedback would be appreciated!<p>Work in progress:
- More mobile friendly search
- Better loading states
- Better ranking on lean text and lean visual searches
- Better thresholding of search results
- Gallery view improvements including original document view with a thumbnail timeline.
- Anyone can flag a document today, I'm working on taking those flags into the search results to better filter out redacted pages, blank pages, and junk pages while boosting consistently flagged newsworthy.
- Open sourcing the processed dataset in a single download / torrent</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46395600">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46395600</a></p>
<p>Points: 4</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 20:00:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://epsteinlibrary.com</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46395600</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46395600</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mikeortman in "Gemini 3"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Its available for me now in gemini.google.com.... but its failing so bad at accurate audio transcription.<p>Its transcribing the meeting but hallucinates badly... both in fast and thinking mode. Fast mode only transcribed about a fifth of the meeting before saying its done. Thinking mode completely changed the topic and made up ENTIRE conversations.  Gemini 2.5 actually transcribed it decently, just occasional missteps when people talked over each other.<p>I'm concerned.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 16:35:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45968508</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45968508</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45968508</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mikeortman in "Changes to the Kubernetes Slack"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think technically they can. It’s because they’re downgrading them to a free service. I’m going to venture to say that it’s a money grab on a previously generous gift by slack.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 12:14:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44288825</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44288825</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44288825</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mikeortman in "Apple introduces a universal design across platforms"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Apple claiming that Liquid Glass is a technique only Apple can achieve, will be replicated, or at least indistinguishably replicated, in pure CSS... within 48 hours of today, out of spite</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 18:09:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44227324</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44227324</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44227324</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mikeortman in "Getting forked by Microsoft"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Just the absence of a license generally means the creator has all right reserved by default. You don’t need a license in every file because in much of the world copyright is given by default to the creator. A licensed file is permission to do something with that copyright material.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 12:45:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43751374</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43751374</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43751374</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mikeortman in "A 10-Year Battery for AirTag"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Just be careful! In SOME jurisdictions, you can get in trouble for 'stealing' if you take back something that was stolen. Possession vs Ownership are 2 different things. For instance, the thief may have stolen something, sold it to someone who bought it in good-faith, and you take it back from that person, it's technically theft!<p>File a police report, go through the right channels. If you know its yours, call the police department non-emergency and explain the situation</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 23:38:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42466899</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42466899</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42466899</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mikeortman in "Sam's Club CTO to Exit Due to Walmart Relocation Policy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Artificially aiming to increase natural attrition through requiring employees to make like-altering decisions (or else) is evil. At the bare minimum, it should be seen as a layoff.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 22:12:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41909091</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41909091</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41909091</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mikeortman in "Winamp deletes entire GitHub source code repo after a rocky few weeks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's wild to nitpick the licensing like this. I get why its conter-intuitive and in violation of Github's guidelines, but it's winamp, folk. It has no intrinsic value these days to update or fork outside of giving people the opportunity to learn from the tricks they had to do to make stuff work. There are solutions significantly better and open source today. 'Canceling' winamp in 2024 was not on my life's bucket list after the year 2000.<p>There is hypocrisy here around internet archive, it's totally OK to store copy-write content on the archive, but its not OK when a company does so on their own.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 18:17:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41862024</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41862024</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41862024</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mikeortman in "Zendesk: Email user verification bug bounty report retrospective"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Comments are disabled or moderated. I tried as well.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2024 23:33:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41823715</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41823715</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41823715</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mikeortman in "1 bug, $50k in bounties, a Zendesk backdoor"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You didn't provide details, you provided a defense, which is weak at best.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2024 23:32:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41823703</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41823703</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41823703</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mikeortman in "My WordPress Slack Ban"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This checkbox will absolutely not look good in front of a jury. It's petty at best.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2024 02:13:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41815784</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41815784</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41815784</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mikeortman in "Three Mile Island nuclear plant restart in Microsoft AI power deal"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I feel like we are living in an episode of the Simpsons at this point</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:16:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41601714</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41601714</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41601714</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mikeortman in "Reclaim the Stack"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm glad we are starting to lean into cloud-agnostic or building back the on-prem/dedicated systems again.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2024 23:59:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41484321</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41484321</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41484321</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mikeortman in "Reclaim the Stack"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think the very concept of this is to open source a common stack, instead of relying on a middleman like Porter, which also costs a TON of money at business tier</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2024 23:51:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41484279</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41484279</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41484279</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mikeortman in "Show HN: LLM-Term – Simple Rust-based CLI assist tool"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It baffles me why people would be so unnecessarily critical on someone's project they are showing off in a show-and-tell fashion. It's a neat project with value.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:29:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41390603</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41390603</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41390603</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mikeortman in "Own a weather station? We want your data"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm fairly sure weather.gov's api doesn't have an SLA of any kind. I highly recommend going through the push vs polling approach if possible and store the data as it comes in live in your own DB. AWS Open Data + MADIS are good sources that are... for reasons... far more stable<p>EDIT: sorry, I misread your commend. If it's only once every 30 secs, that may be a bit overkill for your needs. You may be able to get the appropriate text product directly and parse it out. Unfortunately probably the most stable, yet clunkiest, way</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 04:14:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40615236</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40615236</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40615236</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mikeortman in "Own a weather station? We want your data"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah, they did... but being blunt, IBM had 8 years to do a lot of damage. Not speaking of the engineers or the tech behind it, I'm talking about escalating the ad revenue and general junk on their website. MOST of the page load time on weather.com and AccuWeather is ad and tracking. It's an ungodly number of requests and will drain a data plan's usage limits surprisingly quickly.<p>Just opening weather.com will send almost 1000 requests , transfer 10.3MB. Every 30 seconds or so it will make about 300 requests + 2MB of transfer for new ads. It's... insane</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 04:09:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40615203</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40615203</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40615203</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mikeortman in "Own a weather station? We want your data"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://www.weewx.com" rel="nofollow">https://www.weewx.com</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 03:20:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40615022</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40615022</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40615022</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mikeortman in "Own a weather station? We want your data"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's hard to get accurate numbers as many weather sites are privately held. But to give some info:<p>Weather Company was sold for $2B to IBM in 2015 (and recently sold to private equity for undisclosed amount). Tomorrow.IO has a $1B+ valuation pre-IPO SPAC.<p><a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsier/2021/04/08/ibms-weather-company-has-a-path-to-billions-in-new-revenue-thanks-to-the-rise-of-the-subscription-economy/" rel="nofollow">https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsier/2021/04/08/ibms-we...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 03:17:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40615009</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40615009</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40615009</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mikeortman in "Own a weather station? We want your data"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hi, hobbyist here! This is a huge area where government meteorologists and "Big Weather" differ and you can help close that gap!<p>For context:<p>The governments of the world provides these big weather companies (weather.com (cough IBM), Accuweather (cough IBM cough), etc) a metric shit ton of their data completely for free (by law) including data transfer. These are things like radar, satellite, ground station data, forecasts, composite models, etc. These companies profit substantially on it, as in billions of dollars. You as citizens also can get this data completely for free as well! MADIS is a system the government is working on to make that data access easier by bringing together many of these systems together and removing the bureaucratic redundancy and abstracting out the aging infrastructure. This is literally terabytes of data per day you can grab with almost no questions asked. That data is then processed privately and resold and repackaged to the end user, and you probably interact with this privatized data the most.<p>The frustration I have much of the additional "value" these weather data brokers provide is by linking up with each other with data contracts. These private companies have a much much higher detail on the ground than the government by being able to partner with companies that make common internet-connected personal radar stations and reselling that data to each other. The government doesn't have that privilege to buy limitless data. NOAA/NWS, for example, is extremely underfunded so if they had to privilege to buy it they probably couldn't come to an agreement to buy it. As a result, they can't use that data to improve the accuracy of alerts/warnings/forcasts, the same exact tools that the big weather companies make all their money from. It's a shit cycle and totally unfair IMO.<p>So please contribute if you can!!<p>Sidebar: I'm a founder of a self-bootstrapped startup to build a better weather data broker that doesn't cost an arm and a leg. If that's something you are passionate about solving, feel free to reach out :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 02:47:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40614898</link><dc:creator>mikeortman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40614898</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40614898</guid></item></channel></rss>