<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: minimeow</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=minimeow</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 08:47:13 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=minimeow" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by minimeow in "GUIs should be fully keyboard-driven"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The author makes an excellent point. There are too many poor Terminal UIs created just for the sake of having a TUI. Often these are not well constructed or lack sufficient thought to be effective/productive.<p>But the broader trend in GUI apps has been to target marketshare not deliver productivity for keyboard users. Back in the 80s and 90s Photoshop, Illustrator etc. became the powerhouses they are today because they focused on allowing professionals to be extremely efficient using their array of powerful keyboard shortcuts. In 2026 when software companies are dying of KPItis scoring their product management on creating compelling subscription models to hook customers, attention to actually delivering productivity for keyboard users is often an after thought. Mobile apps don't have keyboard shortcuts and desktop apps seem to increasingly be treated as as the narrow "edge case" with only a few hundred million target users versus the billions available on mobile devices. It's an opportunity for those who get serious about delivering value by leveraging the power of keyboard shortcuts to make their GUIs highly productive and comprehensively usable from the keyboard. For all their faults, Microsoft got this right with VSCode.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 18:55:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49482847</link><dc:creator>minimeow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49482847</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49482847</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by minimeow in "Sovereign Tech Agency invests €500k in Flatpak"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My trust in Flatpak diminished after installing the book reader Calibre and finding that despite the sandboxing Calibre was given blanket access to my drive. Apparently a quirk of the developer behind Calibre insisting upon it. No warnings or communication of the exception were given. All trust I had in Flatpak was eroded from that moment on. Curious about the podman options or similar. Having desktop apps in a container with selective access to system resources seems like it would be more secure and configurable if configured correctly. Flatpak as it stands seems to be a legacy solution to what should be a container and namespacing solution.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 07:30:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49475487</link><dc:creator>minimeow</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49475487</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49475487</guid></item></channel></rss>