Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46950011

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46897733

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

"The studios and creators who thrive in this new landscape will be those who can effectively harness AI’s capabilities while maintaining the human creativity and vision that ultimately drives the art of cinema."

It is in many ways thrilling to see this come to life, and I couldn't agree with you more.

> Later iOS 26 beta releases show Apple reducing transparency and adding blur effects for better readability.

This is a beta release. It is a work in progress. When iOS 7’s betas came out the reaction was similarly negative. I would suggest we wait and see what the system evolves into; by the time we get to iOS 27 I am quite sure that Apple will have found the right balance.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43178637

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42393177

Points: 4

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42236356

Points: 2

# Comments: 1

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41629712

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41578557

Points: 10

# Comments: 8

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41566800

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

Whereas GPT-4o spits out the first answer that comes to mind, o1 appears to follow a process closer to coming up with an answer, checking whether it meets the requirements and then revising it. The process of saying to an LLM "are you sure that's right? it looks wrong" and it coming back with "oh yes, of course, here's the right answer" is pretty familiar to most regular users, so seeing it baked into a model is great (and obviously more reflective of self-correcting human thought)

[1] https://vimeo.com/1008704043

If I'm throwing something small together then sure, I'll maybe use Flask or something lightweight[5]. But Laravel is very good for nearly every use-case where you intend to actually build something.

Then there's the bigger question: if you're building to meet a business use case, or well, to make money, then why wouldn't you use the most complete scaffold possible? I'd say Laravel is that. If it's too much of a pain to do something in PHP I can just stick in a call to a python file or really whatever language I want. But for the basics? A db? Auth? and lots of other stuff that I never want to personally build again? Yeah, give me Laravel everyday.

[1] https://forge.laravel.com/ [2] https://envoyer.io/ [3] https://usefathom.com/ [4] https://vapor.laravel.com/ [5] To prove I'm not a shill, this is from literally last night: https://github.com/simonminton/consensus-article

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41464157

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41461139

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

The article probably wasn't wrong, for when it was first written. This is a curious internet thing - this article is a decade old and has been updated incrementally to keep it somewhat relevant, however because it's about tech that keeps advancing it ends up being a misleading source.

If you look at all of the sources, they're from January 2014 but because the article is undated it leads you to think it's is correct. It's an interesting problem. An old textbook is clearly an old textbook, but a website can just have modern CSS applied, dates removed and there is no apparent guide to the freshness of the article. Internet problems.

[1] https://www.axios.com/2024/08/05/noah-lyles-wins-gold-track-...

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41077946

Points: 16

# Comments: 8

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41056704

Points: 2

# Comments: 0