<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: missingcolours</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=missingcolours</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:47:53 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=missingcolours" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "Who owns the code Claude Code wrote?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In many of those examples, there is payment to the creator of the works that others are learning from. Authors are paid for their books, when we listen to music on the radio the musician is paid royalties, etc. When you lead a team and mentor junior engineers you're being paid for your time.<p>The nature of the source material matters though. Training a model on open source software seems perfectly fair - it has explicitly been released to the public, and learning from the code has never been a contested use.<p>IMO the questions around coding models should be seen as less about LLMs and more as a subset of the conversation about large companies driving immense profits from the work of volunteers on open-source projects, i.e. it's more about open source than AI.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 19:23:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47939305</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47939305</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47939305</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "US court declines to block Pentagon's Anthropic blacklisting for now"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If they can't tell their suppliers not to depend on Anthropic models and services, then... yes, potentially?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 01:22:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47698255</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47698255</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47698255</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "FBI is investigating Minnesota Signal chats tracking ICE"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Right, usually law enforcement gets chat logs from a participant (search warrant for a phone, informants, undercover FBI agents, etc) and uses the metadata to connect messages to a real person's identity.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 02:47:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46790421</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46790421</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46790421</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "FBI is investigating Minnesota Signal chats tracking ICE"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah, and I wouldn't bet money on this happening for that reason. But it is possible.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 21:07:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46786741</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46786741</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46786741</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "FBI is investigating Minnesota Signal chats tracking ICE"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>People were also charged for coordinating and supporting J6 without being there, e.g. Enrique Tarrio of the "Proud Boys" was charged with seditious conspiracy based on activity in messaging apps. If people in these Signal chats were aware that people were using force to inhibit federal law enforcement, which some of the leaked training materials suggest is most likely true and easy to prove, and there are messages showing their support or coordination of those actions, I assume they could face the same charges.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 20:38:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46786249</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46786249</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46786249</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "FBI is investigating Minnesota Signal chats tracking ICE"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Remember that most of the participants in J6 walked away and were later rounded up and arrested across the country once the FBI had collected voluminous digital and surveillance evidence to support prosecution.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 20:17:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46785881</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46785881</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46785881</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "FBI is investigating Minnesota Signal chats tracking ICE"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Presumably Seditious Conspiracy, like many people involved in J6. Conspiracy to use force to prevent or delay enforcement of laws.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 20:15:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46785845</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46785845</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46785845</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "Is passive investment inflating a stockmarket bubble?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>VXUS is up almost twice the S&P 500 year over year, although some of that is likely the weakening of the dollar.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 02:25:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46627238</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46627238</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46627238</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Trump is losing political steam and AI is widely unpopular.<p>It seems extremely popular based on my LinkedIn feed! /s</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2025 02:37:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46251486</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46251486</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46251486</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "Israel used Palantir technologies in pager attack in Lebanon"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The era of microservices and micro teams gives all "company X uses us" claims a different vibe. Maybe it used to actually mean "this is the thing Facebook uses to power its website on millions of servers" but now it's usually like "the team of 6 that runs the analytics platform for Apple Fitness+ uses this on 5 servers"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 20:45:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46223556</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46223556</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46223556</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "Hemp ban hidden inside government shutdown bill"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Only indirectly (see other comment).<p>In 2018 a provision was attached to the Farm Bill to legalize "hemp". The public and presumably the senators were led to believe this was about legalizing textiles and things like that, not drugs. It turned out that the language actually legalized delta-8 too. Many people were displeased with that outcome, because in many states it's completely unregulated with no additional taxes or anything like there is in "legal cannabis" states, and again because it was not understood or anticipated by most people. So now that provision is being reverted in this year's Farm Bill, passage of which was part of the shutdown deal (I think because SNAP benefits are part of the farm bill).<p>Until a month ago in Texas my kids could buy Delta-8 weed gummies at the gas station by my house (the Texas governor issued some emergency regulations to limit this). You didn't even need to be 18. This bill is targeted at those products legalized by the 2018 loophole.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 20:04:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45919814</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45919814</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45919814</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "Hemp ban hidden inside government shutdown bill"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is what always happened with Republican shutdowns too.<p>- You get nothing<p>- Eventually everyone understands they're going to get nothing, so they ask some sacrificial lambs to vote to end it while they posture and pretend they would have "kept fighting"<p>With Republicans this was called "RINOs" and "tea party" but it's the same thing now.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 19:52:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45919648</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45919648</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45919648</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "Snap benefits cut off during shutdown, driving long lines at food pantries"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The reality is that most SNAP recipients are not going to go to food banks or anything like that; they're just going to use their own money and buy groceries or McDonald's.<p>Now, what that means is that they'll have to spend less money on other things to buy groceries. Sometimes that's concerts and fancy clothes. Sometimes it's car repairs or the electric bill; depends on the person and their situation. People in tight financial situations are typically accustomed to getting behind on bills and borrowing money sometimes, and realistically in the short term changing their grocery habits is going to be a lot more of a pain than just spending money.<p>3 months from now in the unlikely scenario that SNAP hasn't been renewed that's a different story.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:46:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45794797</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45794797</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45794797</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "The day my smart vacuum turned against me"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Most "smart" devices simply don't function without connectivity back to the manufacturer's cloud, and this is basically just the same thing with extra steps.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 22:24:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45585763</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45585763</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45585763</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "SEC approves Texas Stock Exchange, first new US integrated exchange in decades"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As a concrete example, Nasdaq had a rule requiring boards of directors to have a certain amount of "diversity".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 02:37:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45522914</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45522914</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45522914</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "Sharpie found a way to make pens more cheaply by manufacturing them in the U.S."]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree with this to an extent, but I've noticed that this type of knowledge is much more prevalent in people who attended the top X% of schools, e.g. Stanford and MIT. I'm not convinced that getting a degree from Midwestern State University gives you much knowledge that being a tinkerer and self-taught technologist doesn't.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 03:13:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45499039</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45499039</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45499039</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "Corporations are trying to hide job openings from US citizens"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As I understand it, the issue is that the official pathway to hire a permanent foreign worker (PERM status) is very long (18 months+), and most companies don't want to start a process in hopes of hiring someone in a year or more. H1B offers a shortcut, where they can be brought in on a temporary permit, then apply for PERM status. But PERM status requires a bona fide search for American workers; using the H1B shortcut legally would require an awkward job search where you already have an employee in the role, and if an applicant is found the current employee not only loses their job but has to literally leave the country. So instead of getting into that awkward situation, employers are faking the "bona fide search" requirement and trying to hand the green card status directly to the H1B even when Americans are available that could do that job.<p>That said... there is still the question of why companies choose to go down this road instead of simply hiring Americans. We can speculate about their intentions (cost saving via lower wages, employees willing to work more hours and under worse conditions, racism, etc) but it's unlikely that they're violating federal law just for fun. This is a lot of hoops to jump through and risk to take on without a compelling reason to do so.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 23:52:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45228038</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45228038</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45228038</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "Senator demands to know status of 'duplicate' SSA database 'immediately'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I assume that means "you can resign, or we'll fire you, your choice".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 02:48:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45218199</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45218199</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45218199</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "Our Response to Mississippi's Age Assurance Law"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>An unfortunate aspect of the American system in today's political climate is that there are many veto points and it's even /typical/ for any new actions to be struck down by courts, so there is a sense in which it's rational to expect any new policies to never actually take effect.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 04:38:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45010253</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45010253</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45010253</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingcolours in "Ghrc.io appears to be malicious"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A common scenario I've seen in the case of local governments is that a department (e.g. the Assessing Department) contracts with a vendor to run the website and has no idea how DNS works, and the vendor defaults to registering new domains for their clients since that's the easiest when dealing with non-technical clients. Texas alone for example has 254 countries, the vast majority of which are very small and have effectively no full time IT department, so when these vendors are engaging new clients, low IT expertise is the norm by volume.<p>The local government itself may have an IT department, but they may not know how to create a subdomain, or even be aware this contract is being made and the site is being set up until after it's announced to the public.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 04:34:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45010230</link><dc:creator>missingcolours</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45010230</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45010230</guid></item></channel></rss>