<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: missingrib</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=missingrib</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 04:06:34 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=missingrib" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "It's still ok to enjoy programming"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you can't get it to output good code I'm afraid it's probably a skill or prompting issue. There are programmers that are almost certainly better than you that are using LLMs regularly to produce good code. Do you think the Linus is a bad programmer?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 00:52:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50159987</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50159987</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50159987</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "Could AIs Become Conscious?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Considering it's the only thing I'm directly aware of I think I can safely reject that it's a made up concept.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 20:48:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49380084</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49380084</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49380084</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "The revenge of the philosophy majors"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Philosophers were discussing that question far before LLMs were around.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 16:30:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48820116</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48820116</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48820116</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "Artificial intelligence is not conscious – Ted Chiang"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Right, it's an illusion of understanding. There is some sort of symbolic understanding, but that is completely due to the fact that the training data was made by humans who actually do understand, can interact with the world, and can write their thoughts down so that the LLM can insert some sort of reference to "basketball" and "Michael Jordan" in their embeddings or whatever.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 04:59:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394107</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394107</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394107</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "Artificial intelligence is not conscious – Ted Chiang"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think Searle's Chinese Room argument refutes this. LLMs are simply manipulating symbols, they do not have semantic understanding. This is why hallucinations exist. And Searle's argument extends even further than LLMs.<p>You are basically arguing for a functional account of consciousness, but things like this have been debated for literally decades/centuries in philosophy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 04:53:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394055</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394055</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394055</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "New mathematical framework reshapes debate over simulation hypothesis"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You have first-person knowledge of qualia. I'm not really sure how you could deny that without claiming that qualia doesn't exist. You're claiming some middle ground here that I think almost all philosophers and neuroscientists would reject (on both sides).<p>> "couldn't something be H2O without being water?," "what if the universe was created last Thursday with false memories?," or "what if only I'm real?" These are dead-end questions. Like 14-year-old-stoner philosophy: "what if your red is ackshuallly my blue?!"<p>These are all legitimate philosophical problems, Kripke definitively solved the first one in the 1970s in Naming and Necessity. You should try to be more humble about subjects which you clearly haven't read enough about. Read the Mary's room argument.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 21:58:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46379722</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46379722</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46379722</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "New mathematical framework reshapes debate over simulation hypothesis"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That is not what a p-zombie is. The p-zombie does not have any qualia at all. If you want to deny the existence of qualia, that's one way a few philosophers have gone (Dennett), but that seems pretty ridiculous to most people.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 06:15:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46362903</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46362903</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46362903</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "Discord says 70k users may have had their government IDs leaked in breach"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why haven't zero knowledge proofs shined in this area? Can anyone explain?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 03:47:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45523284</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45523284</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45523284</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "Social anxiety isn't about being liked"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is relatable, mine is somewhat similar. It feels like a very specific version of performance anxiety that unfortunately affects the most banal social interactions. It is obviously multiplied tenfold when I'm in a situation where there are actual stakes (an interview, a first date, etc), but it still applies if I am just talking to a friend of a friend at a party that I don't know very well. The stakes feel very high to me because it's our first time talking.<p>It's less that I need them to like me or fear being disliked and more that I am just way too conscious of the stakes and the social interaction that's happening, which causes my brain to sort of freeze up. It feels like when I used to play tennis in high school. I'd do great at practice, then freeze up and barely remember how to hit the ball in games because the stakes on each point felt so high.<p>If I'm around some good friends it completely goes away. If I have hung around the person enough (even without directly talking to them), it goes away. I've also had random days where I don't feel the performance anxiety and performed really well in those situations (and coincidentally some of those days I'd meet a new group of friends or a girlfriend). It's extremely frustrating. Xanax makes the performance anxiety go away completely but slows me down cognitively so I become much less witty and interesting to talk to.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2025 04:32:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45478858</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45478858</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45478858</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "AGI is an engineering problem, not a model training problem"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That is only true if consciousness is physical and the result of some physics going on in the human brain. We have no idea if that's true.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2025 03:33:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45001118</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45001118</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45001118</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "Claude Opus 4 and 4.1 can now end a rare subset of conversations"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>Isn't consciousness an emergent property of brains?<p>Probably not.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2025 00:10:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44918700</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44918700</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44918700</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "AGI Is Still 30 Years Away – Ege Erdil and Tamay Besiroglu"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, they can't have understanding or intentionality.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 22:57:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43723098</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43723098</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43723098</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "MIT study explains why laws are written in an incomprehensible style"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Pretty easy to fix:<p>[2] 3.3.4 Date of Issuance. To determine the record date for ownership of Common Stock shares (whether issued as a book entry or certificate), ask: Were the Company's stock transfer books or the Warrant Agent's book entry system open when the Warrant was surrendered and the Warrant Price was paid? If yes, the record date is that same date of surrender and payment. If no, the record date is the close of business on the next day when either the books or systems are open.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 18:53:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42464563</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42464563</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42464563</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "LLMs, Theory of Mind, and Cheryl's Birthday"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is this really verbal reasoning? It's just a logic problem.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2024 02:40:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41747338</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41747338</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41747338</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "Physically attractive attorneys tend to have greater success in federal court"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It correlates, which could also explain a link in the opposite direction. Secondary sex characteristics sometimes have nothing to do with overall fitness. You can see this most clearly in animal species where the females value elaborate ornamentation, like peacocks.<p>See <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisherian_runaway" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisherian_runaway</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexy_son_hypothesis" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexy_son_hypothesis</a>.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2024 20:46:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40025933</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40025933</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40025933</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "The Deaths of Effective Altruism"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's just people coping with guilt about not giving to charity honestly. That, and ad hominem attacks on the people involved. You see people giving kidneys away and there are still articles talking about how its selfish or misguided.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 06:04:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39950368</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39950368</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39950368</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "The Deaths of Effective Altruism"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I cannot think of a reason to prefer to help a neighbor over someone who is vastly more in need who is further away. I think that's the main thrust of the argument.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 06:01:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39950355</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39950355</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39950355</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "Simpson's paradox"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't think Zeno's paradoxes have truly been proven false.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:01:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39681100</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39681100</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39681100</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "British intelligence able to read and flag private Snapchat messages"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It was probably used in the Silk Road investigation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:40:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39385645</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39385645</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39385645</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by missingrib in "Generalized K-Means Clustering"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've used it for identifying dominant colors in images.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2024 03:52:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38977200</link><dc:creator>missingrib</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38977200</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38977200</guid></item></channel></rss>