<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: mlinksva</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=mlinksva</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 19:10:32 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=mlinksva" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mlinksva in "Illinois just told every operating system to start reporting your kid's age"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The CA amending bill with a carve-out for open source is still active, is not yet law (see <a href="https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1856&showamends=false" rel="nofollow">https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.x...</a> for the changes to current law if the bill passes).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 22:32:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49250785</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49250785</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49250785</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mlinksva in "Third Drone Shot Down in Three Days in Romanian Territory"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Including on the dimensions of (1) having a very fast website and (2) not having any paywalls. Feels very good to read.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 19:33:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49061571</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49061571</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49061571</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mlinksva in "Modernizing Property Tax Assessments in Allegheny County"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Agreed as does the org putting out the linked paper <a href="https://www.prohousingpgh.org/blog/policy-land-value-taxes" rel="nofollow">https://www.prohousingpgh.org/blog/policy-land-value-taxes</a><p>And if you read the linked paper, particularly the section "Effects of Reassessments on Split-Rate Taxing Bodies" (split rate being the riff you're referring to), making land value assessments more accurate of course makes land value taxation more appealing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 03:11:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48887417</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48887417</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48887417</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mlinksva in "Right to Local Intelligence"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I can't tell from the site or the linked twitter handles. Their core ask for every state seems to be "Please support clear safe-harbor language for lawful local AI ownership, research, model modification, open-source publication, and local execution" rather than stopping or amending any specific bill/law.<p>One they _could_ be referring to is the California AI Transparency Act which isn't compatible with open source licensing, see <a href="https://github.blog/news-insights/policy-news-and-insights/github-joins-coalition-advocating-for-fixes-to-california-ai-transparency-act-to-protect-open-source/" rel="nofollow">https://github.blog/news-insights/policy-news-and-insights/g...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 02:11:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769905</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769905</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769905</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Advocating for fixes to California AI Transparency Act to protect open source]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://github.blog/news-insights/policy-news-and-insights/github-joins-coalition-advocating-for-fixes-to-california-ai-transparency-act-to-protect-open-source/">https://github.blog/news-insights/policy-news-and-insights/github-joins-coalition-advocating-for-fixes-to-california-ai-transparency-act-to-protect-open-source/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649820">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649820</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 19:07:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://github.blog/news-insights/policy-news-and-insights/github-joins-coalition-advocating-for-fixes-to-california-ai-transparency-act-to-protect-open-source/</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649820</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649820</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[An Open Letter on Transparent AI Cyber Protections]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://freefable.org/">https://freefable.org/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48544523">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48544523</a></p>
<p>Points: 6</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 17:34:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://freefable.org/</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48544523</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48544523</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Itty Bitty Mosquito Committee]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.ittybittymosquitocommittee.org">https://www.ittybittymosquitocommittee.org</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48531494">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48531494</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 19:17:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.ittybittymosquitocommittee.org</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48531494</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48531494</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mlinksva in "A low-carbon computing platform from your retired phones"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Cool concept, I hope it becomes fully realized, scaled, copied. Created a play prediction question to track that <a href="https://manifold.markets/MikeLinksvayer/by-eoy-2030-what-will-happen-with-g" rel="nofollow">https://manifold.markets/MikeLinksvayer/by-eoy-2030-what-wil...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:34:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48518290</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48518290</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48518290</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mlinksva in "Colorado Amended SB051 (Age Verification Bill) to Exclude Open Source Projects"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Good development, along with the most recent changes to <a href="https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1856" rel="nofollow">https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtm...</a><p>A colleague is hosting a virtual session on these and other similar bills around the world in two days <a href="https://maintainermonth.github.com/schedule/2026-05-22-age-assurance-laws-and-open-source" rel="nofollow">https://maintainermonth.github.com/schedule/2026-05-22-age-a...</a><p>Or, now slightly out of date, read <a href="https://github.blog/news-insights/policy-news-and-insights/why-age-assurance-laws-matter-for-developers/" rel="nofollow">https://github.blog/news-insights/policy-news-and-insights/w...</a> Added: I had not scrolled far enough on the front page, <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214215">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214215</a> is on this blog.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 23:33:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215823</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215823</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215823</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[The "Digital Complexity" of Nations]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://github.blog/news-insights/policy-news-and-insights/how-researchers-are-using-github-innovation-graph-data-to-reveal-the-digital-complexity-of-nations/">https://github.blog/news-insights/policy-news-and-insights/how-researchers-are-using-github-innovation-graph-data-to-reveal-the-digital-complexity-of-nations/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066397">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066397</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 17:44:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://github.blog/news-insights/policy-news-and-insights/how-researchers-are-using-github-innovation-graph-data-to-reveal-the-digital-complexity-of-nations/</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066397</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066397</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why age assurance laws matter for developers]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://github.blog/news-insights/policy-news-and-insights/why-age-assurance-laws-matter-for-developers/">https://github.blog/news-insights/policy-news-and-insights/why-age-assurance-laws-matter-for-developers/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066383">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066383</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 17:43:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://github.blog/news-insights/policy-news-and-insights/why-age-assurance-laws-matter-for-developers/</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066383</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066383</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mlinksva in "Show HN: Xmloxide – an agent-made Rust replacement for libxml2"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Which is approximately all companies because all companies use software and depending on what the researchers look at, 90% to 98% of codebases depend on OSS.<p>Conclusion: support OSS from general taxation, like the Sovereign Tech Fund in Germany does. It's a public good!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2026 20:34:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47210379</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47210379</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47210379</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mlinksva in "Closing this as we are no longer pursuing Swift adoption"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://x.com/awesomekling/status/1822236888188498031" rel="nofollow">https://x.com/awesomekling/status/1822236888188498031</a>
<a href="https://x.com/awesomekling/status/1822239138038382684" rel="nofollow">https://x.com/awesomekling/status/1822239138038382684</a>
"In the end it came down to Swift vs Rust, and Swift is strictly better in OO support and C++ interop."</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 00:49:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47068521</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47068521</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47068521</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mlinksva in "Running NanoClaw in a Docker Shell Sandbox"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>ExoAgent (from your bio/past comments) looks really interesting. Godspeed!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 04:31:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47043725</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47043725</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47043725</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mlinksva in "The WebRacket language is a subset of Racket that compiles to WebAssembly"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't know that there are any similaries besides the names -- well maybe something thematic about distributing the future or what looked like it at the time to more programmers -- but the handful of times I've run across Grain (probably all on HN) I'm reminded of Wheat <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20050215032130/http://wheatfarm.org/" rel="nofollow">https://web.archive.org/web/20050215032130/http://wheatfarm....</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 05:06:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46715553</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46715553</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46715553</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mlinksva in "TimeCapsuleLLM: LLM trained only on data from 1800-1875"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Do you have a pointer to where LeCun spoke about it? I noticed last October that Dwarkesh mentioned the idea off handedly on his podcast (prompting me to write up <a href="https://manifold.markets/MikeLinksvayer/llm-trained-on-data-from-1900-comes" rel="nofollow">https://manifold.markets/MikeLinksvayer/llm-trained-on-data-...</a>) but I wonder if this idea has been around for much longer, or is just so obvious that lots of people are independently coming up with it (parent to this comment being yet another)?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 19:13:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46592852</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46592852</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46592852</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mlinksva in "Coarse is better"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Good title!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 02:49:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46350829</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46350829</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46350829</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mlinksva in "History LLMs: Models trained exclusively on pre-1913 texts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Different cutoff but similar question thrown out in <a href="https://www.dwarkesh.com/p/thoughts-on-sutton#:~:text=If%20you%20trained%20an%20LLM%20on%20the%20data%20from%201900%2C%20it%20wouldn%E2%80%99t%20be%20able%20to%20come%20up%20with%20relativity%20from%20scratch" rel="nofollow">https://www.dwarkesh.com/p/thoughts-on-sutton#:~:text=If%20y...</a> inspiring <a href="https://manifold.markets/MikeLinksvayer/llm-trained-on-data-from-1900-comes" rel="nofollow">https://manifold.markets/MikeLinksvayer/llm-trained-on-data-...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 06:49:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46322927</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46322927</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46322927</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mlinksva in "The patent office is about to make bad patents untouchable"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've had approximately the same thought, to different but complementary ends "More generally (not covered in this question) perhaps this could also be a fun way to interrogate the tech tree, e.g., what could have been discovered given the data at a given cutoff, how early or late certain advancements came, etc." <a href="https://manifold.markets/MikeLinksvayer/llm-trained-on-data-from-1900-comes" rel="nofollow">https://manifold.markets/MikeLinksvayer/llm-trained-on-data-...</a><p>Would love to see it!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46081103</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46081103</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46081103</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mlinksva in "Developers still need the right to challenge junk patents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Lots of discussion on the EFF's post on this same topic last week <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45985890">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45985890</a><p>I expect a deluge of critical comments near the Dec 2 deadline. Add yours! :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 20:21:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46038774</link><dc:creator>mlinksva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46038774</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46038774</guid></item></channel></rss>