<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: mlpotato</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=mlpotato</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 13:35:12 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=mlpotato" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mlpotato in "GitHub's Fake Star Economy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wonder if it makes sense for GitHub to use graph-theoretic measures like PageRank instead of raw stars. In simple terms, a repo is considered <i>important</i> if it is starred or forked by GitHub users who maintain other <i>important</i> repos.<p>It’s more expensive to compute, but the resulting scores would be more trustworthy unless I’m missing something.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 11:41:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47832882</link><dc:creator>mlpotato</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47832882</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47832882</guid></item></channel></rss>