<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: monster_group</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=monster_group</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 01:43:35 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=monster_group" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "Cambodia unveils statue to honour famous landmine-sniffing rat"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Stark reminder of how precious and meaningful a life can be - of any creature,  no matter how small. We should be nice to all creatures not just humans.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 18:14:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679191</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679191</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679191</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "Questions engineers should ask future employers in interviews"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ideally yes, one would ask these questions. Practically, there is not enough time. You'd be lucky to get even 5 minutes to ask all these questions. Even if you have the time, you have to ask these questions in a diplomatic manner. Unless you are a well known hot shot in your field, a job interview is marred by power imbalance and any signal that you are cynical, confrontational, question authority etc. will count against you. So do ask these questions, but be careful how you frame them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 12:33:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46391439</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46391439</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46391439</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "Americans Are Using PTO to Sleep, Not for Vacation–Report"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One doesn't need unlimited PTO to be dead.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 19:26:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45398665</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45398665</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45398665</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "Time Dilation Formula / Calculator"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Author's description of twin paradox is incorrect. In fact, the paradox is not described at all. The paradox is that since motion is relative then from both twin's perspective the other twin goes on a journey and ages slowly. So why it is that on returning, only the traveling twin has aged slowly? The answer is that both twins indeed see each other age slowly but for the traveling twin to come back they have to slow down to zero and reverse direction. At that moment the frame is no longer inertial. While turning around, the traveling twin will see the stationary twin age very quickly (enough to catch up with their earth age), so when they meet there's no paradox. For each of them the other has aged as per their observations.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 16:09:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42656892</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42656892</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42656892</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "Ask HN: Where to put a static page that would last forever"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nothing lasts forever. Even 100 years is a very long time given the technology / cultural / legal changes. It's futile to try to come up with an eternal solution. Just host it on something that seems to be reliable / stable for the foreseeable future and tell the younger generation to migrate it after you are gone to whatever tech of their day is going to be. If the younger generation does not care to migrate your work, then it is not of value to their generation and it is OK for it to fizzle out. Sorry if that sounds harsh, but it is probably best to have realistic expectations about how much people would care about your work after you are gone.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2024 14:16:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42100335</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42100335</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42100335</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "Ghost jobs are wreaking havoc on tech workers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The main (and possibly only) benefit of networking is that hiring manager will look at your resume. Without networking, your resume may never even been seen by the hiring manager. But beyond that networking does not matter for the candidate. In fact, FAANG companies go out of their way to make sure that the person who referred the candidate is excluded from having any involvement in the interview process. The days where you get to skip rounds just because you know someone are gone.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2024 00:31:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42012943</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42012943</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42012943</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "Interviewing the Interviewer: Questions to Uncover a Company's True Culture"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This process is quite normal. The reason is two fold - first they want multiple people to interview the candidate before making a decision, one bad interview doesn't necessarily rule out a candidate. The second reason is the candidate experience. Some candidates feel humiliated if their interview is cut short and will harbor bad impression of the company for a long time. The company doesn't want that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2024 10:48:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41273450</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41273450</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41273450</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "Quitting engineering to pursue art full-time"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And I want to become a quantum theorist. I think being able to manipulate symbols on paper and explain the universe is food for the soul. Grass always seems greener on the other side. :-)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 22:41:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40217326</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40217326</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40217326</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "When a black hole and a neutron star merge"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's not the correct analogy. In classical case, the color of the ball is fixed even before you open the box (you just don't know it). But in quantum entanglement case, the spin is not fixed until it is measured (because the wave function hasn't collapsed). But as soon as you measure the spin you get either up or down value. If you get up, then the other entangled particle will necessarily have down value when measured, If you get the spin down, the other particle will necessarily have the spin up. Now you may say that, the spin of the first particle was fixed all along and we just didn't know it. This argument is called "hidden variables theory". But it is proven by Bell's inequality that such a theory cannot exist, so the spin of particle 1 is indeed a random outcome. What's "spooky" is that in spite of it being random, it instantaneously fixes the spin of the other particle.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 13:17:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39969417</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39969417</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39969417</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "the US is no country for old men"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>While the article may have some truth to it, the emotionally charged language makes it difficult to see the article as having been written objectively.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2023 11:19:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38761693</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38761693</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38761693</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "I worked in Amazon HR and was disgusted at what I was seeing with PIP plans"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's the element in quick sort that you swap around to make sure all elements before pivot are less than it and all elements after are greater than it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2023 01:29:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38481806</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38481806</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38481806</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "Ask HN: I can't find a job. What do I do?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You don't need to get a degree from a top college or even a good one. Just get any easy degree through online / distance learning program to get past filters and dumb HR criteria. For online / distance learning degrees you wouldn't need to compete with million other students. As you get your online degree, you can keep looking for jobs and also work if you can find a job.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2023 17:05:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38334695</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38334695</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38334695</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "Ask HN: I can't find a job. What do I do?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Can you elaborate? Are you taking this decision willingly or are being forced to because you can't clear interviews?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2023 16:57:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38334602</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38334602</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38334602</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "How would you say “She said goodbye too many times before.” in Latin?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>While I don't know Latin, I do know Sanskrit. In Sanskrit you can say entire sentences with one word. For example "जिगमिषामि।" is a full sentence and it means "I want to go." This is possible because Sanskrit (and Latin) are highly inflected languages. The price for brevity is that now you have to remember many more forms of verbs and nouns. So nothing impressive (at least to me).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 12:20:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37404005</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37404005</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37404005</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "So you want to learn physics (2021)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have been working on quantum physics since March of this year and am hoping to complete the whole text book (Townsend) by end of the year. Then on to special relativity -> classical field theory in 2024, general relativity and QFT in 2025 and 2026 - at least that's the plan.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2023 20:29:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37202663</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37202663</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37202663</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "So you want to learn physics (2021)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I decided to start self learning theoretical physics late last year. I have been now studying physics every day for almost a year (before and after work). I did have to brush up on calculus and matrices but it came back very quickly (within a few days) after a 25 year gap so I'd say don't let that discourage you.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2023 19:02:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37202006</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37202006</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37202006</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "All of Physics in 9 Lines"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not a physicist either but currently self learning quantum physics. Note that Planck length and time are just units - they do not mean that space and time are quantized. Quantum theory treats space and time as continuous variables. While it has been speculated that space and time are quantized I do not believe this has been experimentally verified because the scales involved are beyond current experimental reach.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2023 15:04:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37199860</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37199860</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37199860</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "Ask HN: Did studying proof based math topics make you a better programmer?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you want to get good at something, you will get far more return on your time and effort investment if you just practice that thing rather than something tangentially related to it. If you want to get good at programming, practice programming not math. Math may help you but it won't help as much as practicing programming.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2023 00:04:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36463886</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36463886</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36463886</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "Ask HN: How are you a good dad to your kids?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>By -<p>1 Listening to them talk about stuff that is interesting to them but not to me such as video games, kids' books, toys.<p>2 Fixing their broken toys.<p>3 Building science models with them<p>4 Helping them collect stuff (such as rocks etc.) for school projects<p>5 Not yell at them when they don't get a simple math or programming concept (I have had a multi decade head start on them so I need to be patient)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 18:54:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35966056</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35966056</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35966056</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by monster_group in "Career advice no one gave me: Give a lot of notice when you quit"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is terrible advice. Great that it has worked for the author but it does not mean it's a good idea for everyone. 2 weeks is the standard and as long as you give that you maintain good relations. Most people are not as valuable or important as they like to think they are. I have seen very important people leave / fired and things still go on. (Twitter is still working - isn't it?) Once you tell that you are leaving, everybody's attitude towards you changes. You want to minimize that awkward period. There's nothing to be gained by staying longer than 2 weeks. If you have stock vesting, wait until stock vests before giving 2 weeks notice.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 00:44:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35648484</link><dc:creator>monster_group</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35648484</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35648484</guid></item></channel></rss>