And even with much care on all the steps, when I read carefully, I still find wrong things at multiple levels.

When folks like uncle Bob says they don't review AI code, I can only think they are burnt out or being unprofessional.

Indeed it saves some time writing the code, but overall, I think we just moved concerns from one place to another. When writing your code, you are automatically reviewing things and integrating with other pieces. Ofc, sometimes mistakes happen, but my impression is that important code still takes about the same to develop.

There are ways to go further and still try to LLM'it all the way, but since claude 4.8 the types of mistakes have been much more convoluted. Fable and opus 5 leaves too many gaps and take so many poor decisions.

GLM has a nice balance. It stops me only when important things come up and it integrates well with my way of working.

With Anthropic is a lot of do a lot, clean up and fix fix fix. With glm has been more like working together and delivering...

Anthropic models have gone wrong.

Ethics, morals and whatever people call only exists if economy is stable. If you let this sort of opportunistic environment exist there will be people to work in it

Not saying it was not who you think it was, Im just saying it does not have enough information yet to be the only explanation or at least the most obvious one.

Up to the moment it has not been the operation adopted which would make it weird.

On who would do it then, anyone who benefits from instability. From corporations trying to sell flocked uped sytems, politicians, etc.

There is one south american country who was attacked exactly this way before their head of the government was kidnapped.

Imagine being able to only throwing money and patenting everything, even if it existed before. The legal behinds this will be so mess that no one will be able to produce anything

I wonder if that could be used a some sort of osint

I noticed on the past few days something weird going on with Google feed on Android (when you swipe left from home main screen)

I started receiving deceiving news with some "shocking" headlines like: "Contagious cancer found in fresh water fish". Android says it was published by "Forbes" but the icon is weird. That caught my attention and I used share button to check the URL and for my suprise the target link is "discover.aigc/?id=.........." (I removed the number just in case)

I used some search engines and I found no relevant related domain. Pinging the domain also returns nothing.i tried accessing it from an isolated environment and the domain seems really offline now.

I'm sure I saw other suspicious links, some had related titles some did not.

It does look like a clickbait based campaign for something "fishy" (pun intended).

I should have taken notes of the other news and domains which i crossed paths with but I did not because at first I thought it would be some mistake or unintentional but it has been so frequent that I could not ignore.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49057483

Points: 8

# Comments: 12

in short, all of them are token diarrhea. Annoyingly logorrheic. they output so much useless stuff that it comes to the point that it makes me thing if that's not on purpose.

it was not because of price, but quality, I started testing other models and honestly, glm 5.2 is FAR SUPERIOR than fable 5 in every aspect. It comes to a surprise when glm 5.2 does not finish the task successfully. Kimi k2.7 does require a bit more of guidance but still better experience than opus 4.8. I have not yet the chance of trying k3.

openai latest model are.... ridiculously bad at software design and implementation.

(note i am only speaking to the domain of my work which has lots of data analysis, machine learning and software engineering.)