Hacker News: movedx01

New comment by movedx01 in "Show HN: Searchable directory of 22k+ products from worker-owned co-ops"

movedx01 — Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:57:43 +0000

More likely implying they are not being compensated fairly.

New comment by movedx01 in "Claude Tag"

movedx01 — Wed, 24 Jun 2026 08:56:03 +0000

From what I've seen trying to play around with Claude Tag, it uses shared credentials. You set it up with Github org access, add it to public channel, and all random people in that channel can now ask it to do stuff with code. It's opposite of what Cursor does - each Slack member needing to connect their own Github account. It's a security nightmare basically.

New comment by movedx01 in "CrankGPT"

movedx01 — Mon, 15 Jun 2026 14:32:47 +0000

nice, cranker

New comment by movedx01 in "Ask HN: What are you working on? (June 2026)"

movedx01 — Mon, 15 Jun 2026 07:38:09 +0000

Nice! I had a similar idea and a prototype based on Temporal. Wondering, what are you using under the hood to runs the workflows?

New comment by movedx01 in "I design with Claude more than Figma now"

movedx01 — Sun, 07 Jun 2026 10:07:30 +0000

> So why are you looking at this code?

Because I am getting the call to fix it when it breaks. I don't have to fix assembly by hand because compilers are deterministic and I have maybe encountered a single real compiler bug in my whole career. Compilers have earned my trust. LLMs are eroding that trust more and more every day I work with them. I encounter LLM-created problems in basically every single diff they surface for me, just over the months the diffs are getting bigger and harder to review and uncover the problems.

LLMs are not an abstraction(not even a bad one) because by design what they are doing is disambiguation. Compilers are not doing that, what you put IN the compiler has to be unambiguous in the first place.

Disambiguation is not a functionality of an abstraction layer. A good abstraction layer is the one I don't have to understand and can trust, if I have to understand its inner workings to use it it ceases to be an abstraction. Except with LLMs you can't even do that, they are a black box you can have no hope of understanding.

And it is not to say LLMs and agentic coding tools are not useful, they are absolutely very useful. They are just not an abstraction layer.

New comment by movedx01 in "SpaceX, Other Mega IPOs Denied Fast Index Entry by S&P"

movedx01 — Fri, 05 Jun 2026 07:56:55 +0000

If someone is trying to bend the rules of my passively managed index fund to their will, are they trying to actively manage my passively managed index ETF ?

New comment by movedx01 in "OpenRouter raises $113M Series B"

movedx01 — Sun, 31 May 2026 07:25:34 +0000

AI studio added it recently, Vertex not.

New comment by movedx01 in "Claude for Creative Work"

movedx01 — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:48:19 +0000

> coming soon

The developers are literally on the bleeding edge here, it might be the most developed of the AI use cases right now. The most advanced tooling for LLMs revolves around SWE work, there are multiple prolific benchmarks that the labs are actively targeting in this area, and new ones are being built, whole product categories being spawned, software companies bleeding money for tokens.

It's the other professions that are to follow once the training data is in place to go reach for their livelihoods. SWEs got the early taste of what is coming. And the blender news is exactly that.

New comment by movedx01 in "Average is all you need"

movedx01 — Fri, 17 Apr 2026 13:31:15 +0000

Average is only a tombstone of someone having failed to do better. And settling for average means pulling down.

When it comes to bs dashboard where "average is all you need", maybe the "better than average" result would be asking yourself if it's even worth doing in the first place?

New comment by movedx01 in "Average is all you need"

movedx01 — Fri, 17 Apr 2026 13:27:01 +0000

Probably the same way other models learned to surpass human ability while being bootstrapped from human-level data - using reinforcement learning.

The question is, do we have good enough feedback loops for that, and if not, are we going to find them? I would bet they will be found for a lot of use cases.

New comment by movedx01 in "Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (April 2026)"

movedx01 — Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:57:18 +0000

I am vibe-porting an old game, Knights & Merchants(actually its Delphi rewrite - KAM Remake) to WASM. It's going well, I even have multiplayer working, will release it publicly at some point.

Learned more about WASM, OPFS, JSPI and other exotic browser stuff more than ever, also learned more about pascal than I ever wanted to, but it's been immensely fun.

New comment by movedx01 in "Thoughts on slowing the fuck down"

movedx01 — Wed, 25 Mar 2026 20:05:40 +0000

Not having a code review process is archaic engineering practice at this point(at any point in history, really), be it for human written or AI written code.

New comment by movedx01 in "LLMs work best when the user defines their acceptance criteria first"

movedx01 — Sat, 07 Mar 2026 09:11:30 +0000

Perhaps the problem is that you RL on one patch a time, failing to capture the overarching long term theme, an architecture change being introduced gradually over many months, that exists in the maintainer’s mental model but not really explicitly in diffs.

New comment by movedx01 in "An autopsy of AI-generated 3D slop"

movedx01 — Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:49:46 +0000

While at the same other companies have built entire business lines around fixing shit code(probably with more of the same though).

New comment by movedx01 in "Will vibe coding end like the maker movement?"

movedx01 — Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:38:28 +0000

It doesn't matter, neither of those scenarios makes the effort impressive in this case. The vibe coded thing might even be useful - that does not make it impressive though. Effort does.

New comment by movedx01 in "AI is destroying open source, and it's not even good yet [video]"

movedx01 — Mon, 23 Feb 2026 18:43:43 +0000

Orphaned or as Peter Naur wrote in 1985(https://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~remzi/Naur.pdf), dead programs :)

New comment by movedx01 in "Writing code is cheap now"

movedx01 — Mon, 23 Feb 2026 17:53:39 +0000

Autolands absolutely do exist.

New comment by movedx01 in "How AI is affecting productivity and jobs in Europe"

movedx01 — Thu, 19 Feb 2026 09:55:33 +0000

You know what is an insult? Supermarket on my street putting on display sloppy ads with ramen bowl that has 3 different thickness chopsticks and cartoon characters with scrambled faces. Now that is an insult, because there was a human being doing that job, and I am sure there was a great "productivity boost" related to that change.

I am a heavy AI user myself, and sure as hell I am not putting my foot in that place again.

New comment by movedx01 in "The Human in the Loop"

movedx01 — Thu, 22 Jan 2026 13:12:25 +0000

AI derived piece arguing with another AI derived piece about AI. It's slop all the way down.

New comment by movedx01 in "Getting a Gemini API key is an exercise in frustration"

movedx01 — Thu, 11 Dec 2025 14:39:40 +0000

Is that even possible? Last time I checked it wasn't, while it was possible with OpenAI. Since that moment(early this year) - OpenAI has removed that option and their "Project budget" feature turned from being a hard limit into an email notification.