That's already the norm.

LLMs will make this very hard to detect, very soon if not already.

Entitlement knows no bounds. Don't worry about those disheartening comments, they are not coming from a place of genuine concern.

Yes, it can be effective to deploy such methods over the limited physical access to employees, but ultimately it is an unsustainable method of control that arguably breeds a cohort of disinterested middle managers over time. A successful organization for its goals has the most motivated workers, needless of such methods of control.

If you really think ads are not by definition intrusive, I am curious to reconsider my stance.

I don't see why we should put ourselves in a position where we need that kind of trust. Another way to put it is, why burden the government with an unsustainable uncompetitive market? For what?

OpenAI is a for-profit private corporation with a commercial service to offer that has no bearing on the most important concerns the government is elected each year to tackle.

Framing actual long-term sustainble practices and policies as "ideological purity" is misleading at best and a textbook example of a strawman at worst.

Though something that annoyed me with the recent v1 release is that it changed the default repository where it pulls the package definitions from Nix's official to a fork made by the author.

That is dangerous and also lags behind an incredibly active and large upstream.

If you want to patch things, use proper Nix overrides or apply the patches using devenv code, don't fork a +80,000-big rolling release package repository.

That aside, it is literally in the title "developer relations." I am not sure what is outrageous in pointing that out.