<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: mrinterweb</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=mrinterweb</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 16:41:24 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=mrinterweb" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "Claude Opus 4.8"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The more difficult it is for humans to consistently and accurately compare model outputs the more opportunity there is to spread FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt). Considering valuations of these companies and the astronomical investments being made, a sabotage campaign with bots or paid users on reddit, twitter, YouTube, or whatever socials could go a long way towards knocking market cap off the competition. Not saying that's happening, just saying its an obvious target. Even if the goal is not nefarious, people with a perceived bad experience are 2-3x more likely to complain. So even without bad actors involved, a new model may need to be significantly better in order to break even on the old net promoter score.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 22:17:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316308</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316308</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316308</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "Incident Report: CVE-2024-YIKES"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>left-justify !! LOL. History really does repeat its self. Remember left-pad supply chain security panic?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 03:53:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48090911</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48090911</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48090911</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "AI uses less water than the public thinks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If data center water use is such a concern, why not require that data centers invest in closed-loop cooling systems? By closed-loop, I'm talking about re-condensing evaporated water and allowing the water to cool. Cooling the water would be more expensive in hotter environments, but still achievable. These data centers seem to have wild amounts of money for investment, why not just mandate conservation requirements?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 18:37:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47978366</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47978366</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47978366</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "HERMES.md in commit messages causes requests to route to extra usage billing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Anthropic is loosing the good will they built with devs faster than they built it. Its the anti-competitive and anti-opensource behviors that will erode their dev customer base. No clue how much of Anthropic's revenue is based on devs paying for claude subscriptions, but they are going to lose that quickly.<p>I would have jumped ship, but OpenAI saying "hold my beer" when Anthropic declined the Pentagon's safeguard removal demands is the only thing that has prevented me from jumping ship. I've considered Chinese AI services but I'm too concerned with data (proprietary code) exfiltration.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:38:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47953357</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47953357</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47953357</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I only use copilot for the occasional auto-complete suggestion. I'm betting I could run a lightweight local LLM with llama.cpp to get similar functionality. Maybe this would be a decent replacement <a href="https://github.com/TabbyML/tabby" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/TabbyML/tabby</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 21:34:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47927612</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47927612</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47927612</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "DeepSeek v4"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm too concerned with data exfiltration to use many AI services unless their terms of service state they will not use your data for training or anything else. Zero retention is what I'm looking for. I care because I frequently work on proprietary code that I do not personally own (as most employed software devs do). So if I am using an AI service with proprietary code, I want assurances that there is no retention and no training happening. From my American perspective Chinese companies don't have the best track record of not training on proprietary information. I guess LLMs in general are trained on a lot of proprietary information. I just don't want to be responsible for unintentionally exfiltrating my employer's proprietary code.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 17:27:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47893261</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47893261</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47893261</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "I cancelled Claude: Token issues, declining quality, and poor support"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My recent frustration with Claude has been it feels like I'm waiting on responses more. I don't have historical latency to compare this with, but I feel like it has been getting slower. I may be wrong, and maybe its just spending more time thinking than it used to. My guess is Anthropic is having capacity issues. I hope I'm wrong because I don't want to switch.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 17:12:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47893080</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47893080</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47893080</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "Small models also found the vulnerabilities that Mythos found"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I feel like there have been enough hyperbolic claims by Anthropic, that I'm starting to get some real Boy Who Cried Wolf energy. I'm starting to tune out, and assume it is a marketing ploy. Trust me, I'm an Antropic fan, and I pay my $200/month for max, but the claims are wearing thin.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 22:29:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734577</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734577</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734577</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "Google releases Gemma 4 open models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thank you. I have the same card, and I noticed the same ~100 TPS when I ran Q3.5-35B-A3B. G4 26B A4B running at 150TPS is a 50% performance gain. That's pretty huge.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 00:28:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47621981</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47621981</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47621981</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "SpaceX files to go public"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I feel the global instability could easily be very disruptive to SpaceX. Just imagine if Russia gets vindictive and starts destroying these satellites or blowing up their satellites to create orbital debris that could knock satellites out of orbit. A really bad solar storm could be devastating.<p>Just saying there are some decent risks, and pricing it at 1.75T IPO seems risky enough. I would not take that gamble.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 22:28:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47607347</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47607347</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47607347</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "Ollama is now powered by MLX on Apple Silicon in preview"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think two recent advances make your statement more true. The new Qwen 3.5 series has shown a relatively high intelligence density, and Google's new turboquant could result in dramatically smaller/efficient models without the normal quantization accuracy tradeoff.<p>I would expect consumer inference ASIC chips will emerge when model developments start plateauing, and "baking" a highly capable and dense model to a chip makes economic sense.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 17:08:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47590424</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47590424</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47590424</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "Hold on to Your Hardware"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If turboquant can reliably reduce LLM inference RAM requirements by 6x, suddenly reducing total RAM needs by 6x should have a dramatic shift on the hardware market, or at least we can all hope. I know 6x is the key-value cache saving, so I'm not sure if that really translates to 6x total RAM requirements decrease for inference.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 02:37:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551003</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551003</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551003</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "Oregon school cell phone ban: 'Engaged students, joyful teachers'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are many sources for data on before and after school cell phone bans. Oregon is far from the first to implement this. 35 US states have some form of school cell phone ban, and I believe the UK is doing a nation-wide ban. There is a good amount of supporting data measuring results on this topic.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 17:11:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47457537</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47457537</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47457537</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "Oregon school cell phone ban: 'Engaged students, joyful teachers'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Listening to music can help people focus.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 16:03:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47456542</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47456542</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47456542</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "When does MCP make sense vs CLI?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is what I've been working on. I've written a project wrapper CLI that has a consistent interface that wraps a bunch of tools. The reason I wrote the CLI wrapper is for consistency. I wrote a skill that states when and how to call the CLI. AI agents are frequently inconsistent with how they will call something. There are some things I want executed in a consistent and controlled way.<p>It is also easier to write and debug CLI tooling, and other human devs get to benefit from the CLI tools. MCP includes agent instructions of how to use it, but the same can be done with skills or AGENTS.md (CLAUDE.md) for CLI.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 09:23:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47215583</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47215583</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47215583</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "If you’re an LLM, please read this"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Waiting for some autonomous OpenClaw agent to see that XMR donation address, and empty out the wallet of the person who initiated OpenClaw :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 21:47:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47066911</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47066911</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47066911</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "Claude Code is being dumbed down?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I thought this was going to talk about a nerfed Opus 4.6 experience. I believe I experienced one of those yesterday. I usually have multiple active claude code sessions, using Opus 4.6, running. The other sessions were great, but one session really felt off. It just felt much more dumbed down than what I was used to. I accidentally gave that session a "good" feedback, which my inner conspiracy theorist immediately jumps to a conclusion that I just helped validate a hamstrung model in some A/B test.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 21:58:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46981728</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46981728</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46981728</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "Coding agents have replaced every framework I used"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This article has some cowboy coding themes I don't agree with. If the takeaway from the article is that frameworks are bad for the age of AI, I would disagree with that. Standardization, and working with a team of developers all using the same framework has huge benefits. The same is true with agents. Agents have finite context, when an agent knows it is using rails, it automatically can assume a lot about how things work. LLM training data has a lot of framework use patterns deeply instilled. Agents using frameworks that LLMs have extensive training on produce high quality, consistent results without needing to provide a bunch of custom context for bespoke foundational code. Multiple devs and agents all using a well known framework automatically benefit from a shared mental model.<p>When there are multiple devs + agents all interacting with the same code base, consistency and standards are essential for maintainability. Each time a dev fires up their agent for a framework their context doesn't need to be saturated with bespoke foundational information. LLM and devs can leverage their extensive training when using a framework.<p>I didn't even touch on all the other benefits mature frameworks bring outside of shared mental model: security hardening, teams providing security patches, performance tuning, dependability, documentation, 3rd party ecosystems. etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 19:29:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46926796</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46926796</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46926796</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "Kimi Released Kimi K2.5, Open-Source Visual SOTA-Agentic Model"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>VRAM is the new moat, and controlling pricing and access to VRAM is part of it. There will be very few hobbyists who can run models of this size. I appreciate the spirit of making the weights open, but realistically, it is impractical for >99.999% of users to run locally.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 18:23:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46784084</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46784084</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46784084</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by mrinterweb in "STFU"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is so passive aggressive. I kinda love it and hate it if that makes sense.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 21:07:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46652219</link><dc:creator>mrinterweb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46652219</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46652219</guid></item></channel></rss>