I think of my agents like golems from disc world, they are defined by their script. Adding texture to them improves the results so I usually keep a running tally of what they have worked on and add that to the header. They are a prompt in a folder that a script loops over and sends to gemeni(spawning an agent and moving to the next golem script)

I also was curious to see if it could be used it for developing some small games, whenever I would run into a problem I couldn't be bothered to solve or needed a variety of something I would let a few llms work on it so in the morning I had something to bounce off. I had pretty good success with this for RTS games and shooting games where variety is something well documented and creativity is allowed. I imagine there could be a use here, I've been calling it dredging cause I imagine myself casting a net down into the slop to find valuables.

I did have an idea where all my sites and UI would be checked against some UI heuristic like Oregon State's inclusivity heuristic but results have been mixed so far. The initial reports are fine, the implementation plans are ok but it seems like the loop of examine, fix, examine... has too much drift? That does seem solvable but I have a concern that this is like two lines that never touch but get closer as you approach infinity.

There is some usefulness in running these guys all night but I'm still figuring out when its useful and when its a waste of resources.

Escape rooms are honestly... almost always a let down but the concept has a lot of potential and there are some really neat ones that standout like this local one where you pilot an airship https://www.portlandescaperooms.com/steampunk-airship

Once I build the best escape room on the planet, I can consider selling the tools.

I think strategy might be more important in the future than switchy aiming

If programming didn't help me automate my sys admin work, help me make games, websites and other creations I wouldn't bother with it.

The average person could be using computing to solve all kinds of problems but it requires expertise and a time investment that is just not a good value proposition for a lot of people. If GPT or some other thing comes around and makes it so my uncle could say to his computer "hey build me a site so I can show off all my fishing trophies" and it just does it? the world would have a lot more niche software, more weird stuff and overall everyone would be more productive and happy.(or so I hope)

I think these are policies which are important but parties are built around ideologies right? so maybe by looking at all of these and finding a common thread you could make that the corner stone of the hackernews party or whatever.

Getting people to believe your party aligns with them wont be enough though, you have to get people to believe that by not voting for their favorite entrenched party they aren't helping their opponents to win.

I see a lot of posts about Elon(twitter) allegedly taking down posts and limiting the reach of posts but I am not sure how much of it to believe. Especially with the limiting claims, I don't know how you would measure when its being artificially limited and when people just don't care to engage with a post.

I don't doubt that there is some level of manipulation going on but that is always the case with social media.