<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: nachopa</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=nachopa</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 07:21:05 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=nachopa" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nachopa in "Feds freaked over Fable 5 after 'fix this code', not jailbreak, say researchers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So what happens when your D&D paladin travels to an evil kingdom, or a wilderness area with no laws? Or how does the DM handle a player ignoring the character's code of ethics?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:50:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48567602</link><dc:creator>nachopa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48567602</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48567602</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[NanoClaw founder on OpenClaw's 800k lines of code, sloppiness and poor security]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://thenewstack.io/nanoclaw-openclaw-agent-security/">https://thenewstack.io/nanoclaw-openclaw-agent-security/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396375">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396375</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 09:57:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://thenewstack.io/nanoclaw-openclaw-agent-security/</link><dc:creator>nachopa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396375</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396375</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nachopa in "I'm returning my Framework 16"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My point was that soldered RAM and lack of upgradeable components didn't inspire much of a backlash back then. It led to Apple dominating the higher end of the consumer laptop market.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2025 16:48:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46385489</link><dc:creator>nachopa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46385489</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46385489</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nachopa in "I'm returning my Framework 16"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>about a couple of decades ago, there would have been immediate and sharp backlash if any hardware manufacturer pulled the tricks that they do today - soldered-on RAM modules, thermoplastic glue instead of screws, riveted keyboards, irreplaceable ICs...<p>That's when this trend started, with Apple's Macbook Pro leading the way, winding up one of the best-selling consumer laptop brands by targeting incoming college freshmen and their grandparents, focusing on cosmetic appeal over dollar cost for performance.<p>Most buyers don't even know what CPU model their laptop contains, let alone understand the difference between faster or slower processors from different generations. It will always be a tiny segment of the market that appreciates the value of Framework's features.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2025 11:28:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46383761</link><dc:creator>nachopa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46383761</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46383761</guid></item></channel></rss>