<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: nairboon</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=nairboon</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 18:50:31 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=nairboon" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nairboon in "When AI Trading Works, You Won't Hear About It"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, more profitable for the bot operator, given the available capital to deploy.
But it doesn't follow that the bot wasn't working in the first place. Although there are many bots for sale that are indeed not working.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 07:32:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762446</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762446</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762446</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nairboon in "Can Claude Fly a Plane?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Let's hope you don't reach Claude's session limit during approach, while trying to correct a slightly too steep descent angle.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 07:22:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762358</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762358</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762358</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nairboon in "Apple removes Lebanese village names from Apple Maps as Israel attacks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Already happened:<p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742363">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742363</a><p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742680">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742680</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 19:03:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743165</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743165</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743165</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nairboon in "Apple has removed most of the towns and villages in Lebanon from Apple maps?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why do you say unverified? You can activate the hybrid satellite view and look around. There are many towns and cities showing up on satellite view without any label. That's easily verifiable.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 18:51:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743054</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743054</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743054</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nairboon in "How NASA built Artemis II’s fault-tolerant computer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's a social science? Economics is much broader and much less unified than you purport it to be. The (social) science of (in this case) Macroeconomics is just that, an observational science, a bunch of theories and observations (controlled experiments are not really feasible).
The propaganda is caused by politicians, administrators, and policymakers, not really the scientists. There I agree with you, central bankers are a prime example of such propaganda. Ever wondered why almost everywhere the inflation target is 2%? Not 1%, not 3%, but exactly 2%? There is no real scientific reason behind it, that is just policy, or propaganda if you want to name it like that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 13:33:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717904</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717904</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717904</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nairboon in "How NASA built Artemis II’s fault-tolerant computer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are some resemblances, which indicate that you might not have a fully functioning free market. But <i>central planning</i> in the context of von Mises refers to something else. It's about the organization of whole national economies, as in planned economies, a thing you find in communist states or Lenin's "war communism".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 13:20:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717738</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717738</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717738</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nairboon in "How NASA built Artemis II’s fault-tolerant computer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Propaganda is quite a strong term to describe the works of an economist. If one wants to debate the ideas of von Mises, it'd be useful to consider the Zeitgeist at that time. Von Mises preferred free markets in contrast to the planned economy of the communists. Partly because the latter has difficulties in proper resource allocation and pricing. Note that this was decades before we had working digital computers and digital communication systems, which, at least in theory, change the feasibility of a planned economy.<p>Also, the last time I checked, the US government produced its goods and services using the free market. The government contractors (private enterprises) are usually tasked with building stuff, compared with the government itself in a non-free, purely planned economy (if you refer to von Mises).<p>I assume that you originally meant to refer to the idea that without government intervention (funding for deep R&D), the free market itself would probably not have produced things like the internet or the moon landing (or at least not within the observed time span). That is, however,a rather interesting idea.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:43:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715281</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715281</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715281</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nairboon in "Claude mixes up who said what and that's not OK"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They have a lot of data in the form: user input, LLM output.
Then the model learns what the previous LLM models produced, with all their flaws. The core LLM premise is that it learns from all available human text.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:40:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702335</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702335</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702335</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nairboon in "US SEC preparing to scrap quarterly reporting requirement"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That sounds more like a CEO issue than a reporting frequency issue.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 06:52:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47409455</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47409455</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47409455</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nairboon in "The engine of Germany's wealth is blocking its future"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> What a strange comment. The US did not force Russia to invade Ukraine<p>OP's comment doesn't state that. It refers to the US forcing Germany to stop Nord Stream.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 16:15:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47311027</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47311027</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47311027</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nairboon in "Relicensing with AI-Assisted Rewrite"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I assumed that "tests" refers to a program too, which in this example is likely GPL. Thus GPL would stick already on the AI-rewrite of GPL test code.<p>If "tests" should mean a proper specification let's say some IETF RFC of a protocol, then that would be different.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 06:29:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47258262</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47258262</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47258262</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nairboon in "Senate fails to block US involvement in Iran war"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The Senate could have failed only if they intended to do something, but then couldn't do it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 06:06:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47258105</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47258105</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47258105</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nairboon in "Relicensing with AI-Assisted Rewrite"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No, GPL still holds even if you transform the source code from one language to another language.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 05:57:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47258052</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47258052</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47258052</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nairboon in "Relicensing with AI-Assisted Rewrite"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That code is still LGPL, it doesn't matter what some release engineer writes in the release notes on Github. All original authors and copyright holders must have explicitly agreed to relicense under a different license, otherwise the code stays LGPL licensed.<p>Also the mentioned SCOTUS decision is concerned with authorship of generative AI products. That's very different of this case. Here we're talking about a tool that transformed source code and somehow magically got rid of copyright due to this transformation? Imagine the consequences to the US copyright industry if that were actually possible.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 05:55:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47258042</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47258042</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47258042</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nairboon in "British Columbia is permanently adopting daylight time"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Which changes every day.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 12:22:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47231325</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47231325</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47231325</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nairboon in "I don't know how you get here from “predict the next word”"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Just the raw numbers? You list the y's and the x's and the model is approximating y=f(x) from the above example. You can totally do it with pen and paper.
This is what it'd look like (for linear regression): <a href="https://observablehq.com/@yizhe-ang/interactive-visualization-of-linear-regression" rel="nofollow">https://observablehq.com/@yizhe-ang/interactive-visualizatio...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 08:06:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47163280</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47163280</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47163280</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nairboon in "I don't know how you get here from “predict the next word”"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Google chose "understanding" in that context, because the relevant AI/ML task is called "Natural language understanding". But that term is an aspiration. It's the problem of trying to reveal the "meaning" of text data (language) as in making sense of the symbols with computers.<p>Just because Transformers work well on the "Natural language understanding" task in AI, doesn't mean that a Transformer actually "understands" language in the human sense.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 07:56:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47163204</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47163204</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47163204</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nairboon in "D Programming Language"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> We all know...<p>HN isn't as homogeneous as you think. By this measuring stick, half of the posts on the front page can be put into question every day.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 07:02:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46985661</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46985661</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46985661</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Swiss Venture Capital Report 2026 [pdf]]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.startupticker.ch/assets/files/attachments/VCReport_2026_web.pdf">https://www.startupticker.ch/assets/files/attachments/VCReport_2026_web.pdf</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46957078">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46957078</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 09:04:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.startupticker.ch/assets/files/attachments/VCReport_2026_web.pdf</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46957078</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46957078</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nairboon in "Was Benoit Mandelbrot a hedgehog or a fox?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wonder if the people in 100 years will refer to the current time period (now) the same way as we sometimes do to about ~100 years ago.
As in did the scientist and curious minds in the last century really have this golden period to just wander around in all these greenfields, whereas nowadays the fields are not so green anymore. Or is this just a normal phenomena of any time period?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 11:08:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46922907</link><dc:creator>nairboon</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46922907</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46922907</guid></item></channel></rss>