<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: nateoda</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=nateoda</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 16:48:53 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=nateoda" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nateoda in "The Claude Code Source Leak: fake tools, frustration regexes, undercover mode"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My first reaction is that they are using this to take advantage of OSS reviewers for in the wild evals.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 20:19:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47592902</link><dc:creator>nateoda</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47592902</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47592902</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nateoda in "MinIO: A Bare Metal Drop-In for AWS S3"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I would say no in production. I was recently testing a ceph + rgw as an on prem s3 solution, but high throughput puts + ls caused an index corruption that “lost” files according to future LS’s, the file was still there if you directly get it. When this was reported it was already found multiple years ago, and never fixed</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 21:54:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28135162</link><dc:creator>nateoda</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28135162</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28135162</guid></item></channel></rss>