It just got really good over time, especially as new processes get brought it and things change. I can't keep up with that like that AI can, just have it review and go down the path of ensuring that it fit's in my workflow as efficiently as possible and move on.

As far as the developer? I gave him ideas but he's on another team and I got my own guys to feed.

I don't have time for that, and neither do the teams that consume these request. As time has gone on me and the other teams I work with are no longer touching code, the AI will follow processes and procedures that pre date AI just fine with some human reviewing and approving.

AI has turned what was weeks at minimum to get a bug fix out, to just doing it all with with some human gating. It's not been a smooth process but watching it play out in real time it's getting faster, more efficient, and less prone to problems.

And that the crux off the situation, patching and securing configurations need to be done much faster than today, project glasswing has shown us that AI can scale to identify and solve those problems faster than a human.

The issues was really simple, I knew the application, I knew what the bug was and already had a workaround in my head. I simply stopped at going down that rabbit hole and told claude to deal.

It identified the issue quickly, found the workaround and made the developer aware. All those things I would have done I just watched it do for me, plus, the app is vibe coded anyways, I just need it fixed and regardless of the AI path it was faster shooting out the bug report. Which, was simply poor processing of a spreadsheet.

I was in a meeting with someone who had a bug in an application that I don't own myself on Friday so I told claude,

"I need you to find this bug the user is experiencing, find out if it's user error or a bug, let the user know and tell the developer what needs to be fixed if needed"

15 minutes later the developer ask me if I want it fixed today or Tuesday.

That user could have done the same thing as me, had access to all the same systems and tools as I have, and also received the same AI training I had. The difference is that some users are just not, for lack of better words, AI native.

Now if it was trained on the voices from various IP? Or "Computer generated", I think we have an argument that it was trained on her voice.

Typically Peaker Plants fill this role but at much higher cost for electricity and emissions. Batteries just make much more sense for this kind of power.

In the end I didn't need Ozempic, I just started working out several times a week and holding myself accountable to my eating habits. I think for the majority of people diet and exercise is enough. But for those who need more help, even Oprah, it's a miracle drug.