<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: nemo1618</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=nemo1618</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 10:12:19 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=nemo1618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemo1618 in "Non-Determinism Doesn't Matter"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It warms my heart to see so many people in the comments clarifying that LLMs can indeed be deterministic. This was not always the case!<p>I hope that we will soon see deterministic inference offered by frontier labs (presumably at a premium rate). In the meantime, you can get deterministic behavior from local models using the right vLLM flags. I've described some of the cool applications of determinism here: <a href="https://lukechampine.com/repligraphs" rel="nofollow">https://lukechampine.com/repligraphs</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:10:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50114334</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50114334</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50114334</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemo1618 in "Nix wrote half of my debugger"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thank you for the kind words! It's funny how much staying power those blog posts have, haha. Michael has some arcane ability to consistently hit the front page of HN.<p>True, I expect models to be pretty correlated with each other as well. But you can at least <i>attempt</i> to quantify that correlation in a rigorous way, by running experiments (e.g. by pointing each model at a big project and comparing the sets of bugs they each find).<p>And yeah, the "double-edged sword" aspect of determinism is definitely the biggest bullet that you have to bite. For me, it's better than the alternative; without determinism, such jailbreaking attacks are still possible, just harder to detect. But I certainly would not want people to go around thinking "it's deterministic, therefore it's safe."</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 06:26:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50040302</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50040302</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50040302</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemo1618 in "Nix wrote half of my debugger"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>LLMs can be deterministic too! People just don't bother because the applications of this aren't widely known yet. See <a href="https://lukechampine.com/repligraphs" rel="nofollow">https://lukechampine.com/repligraphs</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 22:48:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50037942</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50037942</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50037942</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemo1618 in "Repligraphs: A Primitive for AI Provenance"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>True, you can't do this with GPT or Claude, at least not today. But you can do it with a local model: vLLM supports deterministic inference out of the box! (If you have a MacBook, you can confirm this yourself; just point your agent of choice at the site. It will download a small open model and run it with vLLM Metal.)<p>Naturally, I hope that OpenAI and Anthropic will one day offer deterministic inference; see the "Weights" page for what this might look like.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 19:22:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49821176</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49821176</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49821176</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Repligraphs: A Primitive for AI Provenance]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://lukechampine.com/repligraphs/">https://lukechampine.com/repligraphs/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49819932">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49819932</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:52:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://lukechampine.com/repligraphs/</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49819932</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49819932</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemo1618 in "Brood War Bench"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I had a similar idea for Super Smash Bros Melee! There is a lot of very low-quality footage out there; surely you could train some sort of model to convert it to Slippi replays. A year or two ago this would have been a grad student project; a year or two from now, it will be a one-shot prompt.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 17:53:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49778174</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49778174</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49778174</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemo1618 in "Brood War Bench"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Even at Burning Man, in the middle of the desert, there is a camp that hosts a StarCraft tournament every year (on the dustiest setups you've ever seen!) :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 20:46:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49769987</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49769987</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49769987</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemo1618 in "The new rules of context engineering for Claude 5 generation models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Your assumption is mistaken (and a little rude).<p>I love programming. It's in my blood: my father and grandfather were programmers too. I have written everything from SIMD assembly to Hoon, and implemented several languages of my own. Believe me, I am intimately familiar with the phenomenon you are describing.<p>It's true, the devil is in the details. And I will grudgingly concede that, at present, humans are better at exorcising demons than AI. But I see no reason to believe that this will remain true. The gap is narrowing rapidly, and even today there are types of demons that AI can dispatch much more quickly and effectively than you or I can. The fact that vibe coding is possible at all (and that people are willing to pay for vibe-coded apps) is proof that an informal English prompt is sufficient to specify software to an acceptable degree. Not acceptable to everyone, naturally, but at least to the creator and the users.<p>I am not exactly happy about this. It is bittersweet. Much of my identity is bound up in being a programmer. The devil is in the details; but joy and whimsy and great beauty are in the details as well. For a glorious few decades, one could be an artist under the guise of producing economic value. Now, the economic aspect of producing software is being siphoned off, to be done by machines, leaving only the art. I think we will suffer for that, somewhat. But it is a small price to pay.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 15:57:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49085839</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49085839</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49085839</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemo1618 in "The new rules of context engineering for Claude 5 generation models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Further evidence that there is some kind of weird parallel universe thing going on with LLMs. "Figuring out esoteric errors" is one of the things I would cite as a particular strength of agents. I am repeatedly amazed at their ability to root-cause weird behavior on my systems. Here is one example: <a href="https://xcancel.com/lukechampine/status/2047032091053859138" rel="nofollow">https://xcancel.com/lukechampine/status/2047032091053859138</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 05:12:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49054928</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49054928</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49054928</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemo1618 in "The new rules of context engineering for Claude 5 generation models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am quite tired of this take, frankly. The implication is that if we continue iterating on prompt optimization, we're going to reinvent what, JavaScript? BASIC? Lisp?<p>English is not a programming language. Yet English is sufficient to communicate requirements to the degree that we actually care about. A programmer's job is to translate English into lower-level machine language. Necessary to this process is "filling in the gaps" -- that is, extrapolating the expressed intent to cover all the little details that were left unspecified. This system works because humans are at least minimally competent at predicting the preferences of other humans. If your prediction turns out to be wrong, you get feedback and iterate.<p>Well, guess what. LLMs are also competent at predicting the preferences of humans. LLMs can "fill in the gaps" like no one's business. LLMs can iterate on requirements like no one's business.<p>Product managers do not speak to programmers in a language that encodes exact requirements, and yet working software somehow gets shipped anyway. LLMs do not need exact requirements either.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 00:37:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49053384</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49053384</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49053384</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemo1618 in "98% isn't much"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>After Christmas this year, I removed the tree from our living room, and in the process of being moved, it shed of needles <i>everywhere</i>. I swept them up, but I missed a few areas on my first pass. So I did a second pass, but when I looked again, I saw there were still a handful left. It struck me how removing >99% of the needles was nowhere near acceptable! Lots of cleaning jobs are like this, I suppose, because even a tiny mess can be visually distinct. In fact, as you approach 100%, the remaining mess stands out <i>more</i>.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 15:07:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818886</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818886</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818886</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemo1618 in "CrankGPT"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I would love a crank-powered router. Would be a good way to curb internet addiction!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 15:33:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48542808</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48542808</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48542808</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemo1618 in "Formal methods and the future of programming"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think the key is that, while you may <i>think</i> you have a full formal spec of f(), you actually do not. You have a program written in some language, and that language has its own spec, and the language is compiled to asm which has its own spec, and the asm executes on an architecture that has its own spec, and so on.<p>So when you write a function like:<p><pre><code>  func hypot(x, y):
    return sqrt(x*x + y*y)
</code></pre>
You might think you have "fully specified" hypot, but this is far from true! You have said nothing about what registers will be used, for example. This is not a problem; quite the opposite. It's the whole point of using high-level languages: they let you focus on what you care about. A spec is just a program in a very-high-level language.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 23:35:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48534295</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48534295</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48534295</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemo1618 in "Ask HN: What was your "oh shit" moment with GenAI?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The first moment I specifically remember was writing a test of a new RPC protocol back in 2021. There were no agents yet, only "AI autocomplete" in the form of GitHub Copilot. I wrote the "server" half of the test, which received a name and responded with "Hello, <name>". Then I wrote the client code to send "world", and Codex suggested `if response == "Hello, world"`.<p>I was floored by this. How could it have known?!<p>We have come so far in such a short time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 15:23:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48425920</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48425920</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48425920</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemo1618 in "Snowboard Kids 2 is 100% Decompiled"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It really is crazy. I have been contributing the Melee decompilation project for the past year-ish, and things have really accelerated in 2026. Just today I decided it would be nice to have a better "permuter" (program that randomly modifies C in the hopes of finding a better asm match) so I...just asked Claude to make one, custom-tailored to my needs. It almost feels pointless to publish it to GitHub when I can just tell the other contributors "hey fyi you can ask Claude to make you a better permuter"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 03:00:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332060</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332060</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332060</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemo1618 in "The user is visibly frustrated"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You should not swear at LLMs, for the same reason you should not shout a slur even if no one is around to witness it: <i>You</i> witness it, and witnessing yourself being toxic updates you in the direction of "I am capable of toxicity" and eventually "I am toxic." In other words, it stains your soul.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 23:52:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48287590</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48287590</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48287590</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemo1618 in "Defeating Git Rigour Fatigue with Jujutsu"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Good git hygiene is also less important post-LLMs, as the LLM can make sense of even a messy history.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 04:39:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48263436</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48263436</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48263436</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemo1618 in "Migrating from Go to Rust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Agreed. In fact, one of the things I now watch for is my mind starting to "slide off" the text, or finding myself re-reading a section multiple times. It's like the brain subconsciously recognizes a lack of substance even if we can't point to a specific tell.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:39:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48262441</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48262441</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48262441</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemo1618 in "Migrating from Go to Rust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>LLM writing tells are getting more subtle, but they still jump off the page for me, in particular the word "genuine:"<p><pre><code>   "This is the area where Go genuinely shines, and it’s worth being precise about why"
   "the lack of GC pauses is a genuine selling point"
   "Humans are genuinely bad at reasoning about memory"
   "There are cases where the borrow checker is genuinely too strict"
</code></pre>
tbc I don't think the article was fully AI-generated, just AI-assisted. If so, the author did a <i>genuinely</i> good job of it! No one else is commenting on it, so clearly it didn't detract much from the substance. It's just weird that this is becoming increasingly common, and increasingly hard to detect.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 21:20:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261100</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261100</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261100</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemo1618 in "Leaving the Physical World"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Evidence for 1992:<p>> After a disorienting visit from the FBI in May of 1990, I wrote a rant called Crime and Puzzlement, which led to my establishing with Mitch Kapor (who had previously founded Lotus Development Company) an organization called the Electronic Frontier Foundation.<p>> Now, after almost two years of operation...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 17:58:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138880</link><dc:creator>nemo1618</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138880</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138880</guid></item></channel></rss>