<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: nemonemo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=nemonemo</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 05:45:34 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=nemonemo" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "OpenAI unveils its first custom chip, built by Broadcom"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe in 10 years when the tech matures, but IMO now seems a bit too early to have a tech like this.  It is like intelligence without evolution or progress.. yes it can be used in some niche markets, but difficult to be generic.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 20:28:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48665227</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48665227</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48665227</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "Robinhood now lets your AI agents trade stocks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Just like any useful tools, there would be an expert super tool user who could probably generate enough profit based on the tools. The majority would not profit from it in the long run (the monopolistic tool makers would reap any profit from the value chain.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327089</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327089</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327089</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "Claude March 2026 usage promotion"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not sure what you mean by "it", but the doubled usage would be 18h a day.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 23:27:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47382436</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47382436</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47382436</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "Claude March 2026 usage promotion"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, it overlaps well with the market open time. But I thought Claude was good with coding... Does this mean major trading agents write code using Claude to make trading decisions? Or Claude models are relatively better than other models in non-coding trading work?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 23:25:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47382418</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47382418</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47382418</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "Gemini 3 Flash: Frontier intelligence built for speed"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One thing I don't understand is how come Gemini Pro seems much cheaper than Gemini Flash in the scatter graph.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 23:55:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46307273</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46307273</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46307273</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "Gemini 3 Flash: Frontier intelligence built for speed"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Fair point. Asked Gemini to suggest alternatives, and it suggested Gemini Velocity, Gemini Atom, Gemini Axiom (and more). I would have liked `Gemini Velocity`.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 23:51:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46307242</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46307242</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46307242</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "Cognitive and mental health correlates of short-form video use"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The danger of short form videos is because the form enables the algorithm designer to artificially maximize the reward with minimum effort by the viewer. It doesn't matter whether you watch kitten ones initially. After watching it for a month casually, chances are you would end up watching some addictive videos for hours with little effort. It could be some endless stream of Buddhist monks talking about suffering, if someone likes that kind of thing. It's just designed to be addictive with crazy high reward/effort ratio.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 21:30:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45985507</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45985507</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45985507</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "LLMs can get "brain rot""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Have you considered a case where English might not be the authors' first language? They may have written a draft in their mother tongue and merely translated it using LLMs. Its style may not be many people's liking, but this is a technical manuscript, and I would think the novelty of the ideas is what matters here, more than the novelty of proses.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 02:06:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45664166</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45664166</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45664166</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "LLMs can get "brain rot""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What you are obsessing with is about the writer's style, not its substance. How sure are you if they outsourced the thinking to LLMs? Do you assume LLMs produce junk-level contents, which contributes human brain rot? What if their contents are of higher quality like the game of Go? Wouldn't you rather study their writing?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 17:53:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45659116</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45659116</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45659116</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "A small number of samples can poison LLMs of any size"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Are you saying human brain is kind of similarly vulnerable to well-crafted facts? Does it mean any intelligence (human or non-human) needs a large amount of generally factual data to discern facts from fakes, which is an argument toward AIs that can accumulate huge swath of factual data?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 20:50:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45532920</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45532920</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45532920</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "Cloudflare 1.1.1.1 Incident on July 14, 2025"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Agreed in principle, but has anyone seen any practical difference between these DNS services? What would be a more detailed downside for using these in parallel instead of the ISP default as a fallback?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:39:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44584934</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44584934</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44584934</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "Plants monitor the integrity of their barrier by sensing gas diffusion"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Wikipedia article about Consciousness opens with an interesting line: "Defining consciousness is challenging; about forty meanings are attributed to the term."<p>Perhaps "consciousness" is just a poor term to use in a scientific discussion.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 23:58:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44505094</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44505094</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44505094</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "Why English doesn't use accents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How can writing marks help in this regard? I can imagine a language with both a lot of exceptions and writing marks.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2025 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44491490</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44491490</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44491490</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "German court sends VW execs to prison over Dieselgate scandal"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We need to balance the benefit and the downside of the limited liability in corporations. If innovation no longer becomes beneficial for the society and only beneficial for a small number of people, perhaps the society may need to reconsider the concept.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2025 16:09:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44098749</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44098749</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44098749</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "AlphaEvolve: A Gemini-powered coding agent for designing advanced algorithms"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thank you. Updated my comment again.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 23:07:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43990125</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43990125</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43990125</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "AlphaEvolve: A Gemini-powered coding agent for designing advanced algorithms"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The answer says "For rings in which division by 2 is permitted". Is there the same constraint for AlphaEvolve's algorithm?<p>Edit2: Z_2 has characteristics 2.<p>Edit: AlphaEvolve claims it works over any field with characteristic 0. It appears Waksman's could be an existing work. From the AlphaEvolve paper: "For 56 years, designing an algorithm with fewer than 49 multiplications over any field with characteristic 0 was an open problem. AlphaEvolve is the first method to find an algorithm to multiply two 4 × 4 complex-valued matrices using 48 multiplications."</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 22:27:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43989827</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43989827</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43989827</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "How Silica Gel Took Over the World"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This sounds like a great idea, but how do you keep it from being "drained" or hydrated?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 20:28:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43550990</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43550990</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43550990</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "ChatGPT Pro"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Wouldn't you say the same thing for most of the people? Most of the people suck at verifying truth and reasoning. Even "intelligent" people make mistakes based on their biases.<p>I think at least LLMs are more receptive to the idea that they may be wrong, and based on that, we can have N diverse LLMs and they may argue more peacefully and build a reliable consensus than N "intelligent" people.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 18:58:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42331319</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42331319</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42331319</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "South Korean president declares martial law, parliament votes to lift it"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>According to the Martial Law Act, there's an extra power by the martial law commander to move the military as they want.<p>Some translations say "guarding martial law" instead of "precautionary":
<a href="https://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_mobile/viewer.do?hseq=45785&type=part&key=13" rel="nofollow">https://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_mobile/viewer.do?hseq=45785&type...</a>
"Once guarding martial law is declared, the martial law commander shall have authority over the administrative and judicial matters concerning the military of the area where martial law is declared."<p>But this time it was the emergency one.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 21:30:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42311728</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42311728</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42311728</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nemonemo in "Jeff Dean responds to EDA industry about AlphaChip"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Could you please point out the specific lines you are dissatisfied with? Is it something an additional publication cannot resolve?<p>Additionally, in case you forgot to answer, what is your wish for the future of this line of research? Do you hope to see it improve the EDA status quo, or would you prefer the work to stop entirely? If it is the latter, I would have no intention of continuing this conversation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 19:26:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42310178</link><dc:creator>nemonemo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42310178</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42310178</guid></item></channel></rss>