Do you think the US federal government spends too much on welfare?

Maybe doing bogus small requests to prevent the cache from expiring?

I mean in the API you can set the cache expiration time right? But I guess claude code can't do this

This specific model is unaligned, this doesn't say anything about decision models in general.

The more troubling statement is to assert that alignment is at all possible, not just theoretically but also in practice, which is something that is assumed by most players but has never been demonstrated in practice. Current models are not aligned and if it depends on them, people will die

Why is ttc better?

Note that Rust is not a theorem prover and Rust programs are usually not formally verified (there are some extensions like Creusot to verify Rust programs, but they are incomplete and a work in progress)

Compiler bugs are, like, just logic bugs. There's a project to eliminate compiler bugs that cause unsoundness, project zero [0] but, still, without formally verifying the implementation, there is nothing really guaranteeing there's no such bugs left.

(note: unsoundness in this context means having safe code cause UB due to a compiler bug; the fix is usually to make the compiler reject the code with a compiler error)

To make matters worse, Rust still doesn't have a spec, and there is not even a tight definition of what are the rules of unsafe code - that is, what rules you must follow so that you unsafe code doesn't trigger UB. Discussions around this are done mainly in issues of the unsafe code guidelines repo [1]

[0] https://goals.rust-lang.org/2026/roadmap-project-zero.html

https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues

Yes, but they could fail to reproduce due to other situations. I think from this

> Failure to reproduce basically means killed, exiled, or having your groups women taken (by force)

Only "killed" supports the thesis that males were slaughtered

I think the 5% cut from open router is fair if I want to user other cheap models like mimo

It's not a corrupt court. It has judged crimes against humanity cases before, and a lot of countries give credence to it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_indicted_in_the... the people in this list all deserve to be there, I can't see a single exception

My own country (Brazil) supported South Africa charges of genocide against Israel because we believe in this court and the role it fulfills.

For me, the sole problem with this court is that it's reluctant to judge American war crimes and crimes against humanity. But as Europe leaves the US sphere of influence, maybe they will grow a spine. It would be unfortunate if people like George W Bush, Dick Cheney, John Choon Yoo and Jay Scott Bybee died before they were indicted by this court.

There's an US law that says the US will invade Belgium (edit: Netherlands) if the court wanted to investigate an American (???)

I remember Hillary Clinton, in the Obama administration, saying the US is an exceptional country that deserves exceptional conditions regarding this issue

It's frankly ridiculous