<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: nighthawk454</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=nighthawk454</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 20:30:51 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=nighthawk454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "Kev: Tiny Jev-like family of decision models built on top of Qwen3.5"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>which amounts to nearest-neighbor</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 03:53:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49796621</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49796621</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49796621</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "How concerned should we be about Astra's recurrent architecture?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Anyone remember Universal Transformers paper (Dehghani et al) from back in 2018? Recurrent transformers have a history as long as transformers themselves.<p>Somewhat unclear how particularly novel this is vs a way to save compute.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 20:06:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49556090</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49556090</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49556090</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "Show HN: BitBang – Reach machines behind NAT from a browser, no account"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ah good point, no udp. I was looking at webtorrent but it does share the same limitation, unless you’re on the nodejs (non-browser) version.<p>Looking forward to trying bitbang! Seems super neat</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 00:57:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49130133</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49130133</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49130133</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "Show HN: BitBang – Reach machines behind NAT from a browser, no account"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> it still needs to bootstrap the connection via central server. I think that always might be a limitation of P2P<p>I think Iroh has a way of doing it using either DNS or BitTorrent DHT. Not perfect but fairly decentralized</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 19:20:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49127452</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49127452</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49127452</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "More Tailscale tricks for your jailbroken Kindle"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You can add a library view! Checkout this Bookshelf plugin:<p><a href="https://github.com/AndyHazz/bookshelf.koplugin" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/AndyHazz/bookshelf.koplugin</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 18:52:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49101486</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49101486</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49101486</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "As downtown Seattle offices empty, city facing years of 'zombie' towers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This tracks with what I’ve heard around as well. What changed in the financial instruments?<p>My understanding is a lot of the loans have gone PIK or otherwise essentially aren’t serviceable at current prices. Do you think that’s resolvable somehow or just lagging implosion?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 20:39:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788864</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788864</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788864</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "Dispersion loss counteracts embedding condensation in small language models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Some potentially related stuff on the topic:<p>Anisotropy in word embeddings dates back to at least 2017 with word2vec - where there were zero layers.<p>The cone-shaped anisotropy in transformers is known since at least Gao et al. 2019. That lineage explained it fairly intuitively as an artifact of word frequency and softmax geometry (so a training dynamic).<p>A variety of papers followed up by adding post-hoc ‘whitening’ steps (from classical statistics/NLP), then adding regularizers to the loss to penalize the anisotropy, eventually penalizing the covariance matrix (a la VICReg), and then the SIGReg method as a computationally much cheaper way to approximate the full covariance.<p>As another commenter pointed out it’s also similar to the InfoNCE/contrastive learning objectives. Where terms to increase uniformity (spread out evenly) on the hyper sphere were added. Like the SimCSE (Gao 2021) paper or the excellent alignment/uniformity breakdown from Wang & Isola 2020.<p>This proposed dispersion loss seems to be similar in that it pushes things apart by penalizing cosine similarity. Although this one works on the tokens within one sequence. Usually contrastive methods mean pool the sequences and then contrast against the other pooled sequences in the batch.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 05:21:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782836</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782836</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782836</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "Alan Greenspan has died"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Greenbacks … a form of fiat money<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenback_(1860s_money)" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenback_(1860s_money)</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 19:33:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634919</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634919</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634919</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "Vinyl succumbs to Loudness War: more than just collateral damage (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ah, I hadn’t thought about the generational aspect that’s interesting. The aesthetic totally makes sense to me when the music is intended for it / designed with it in mind, which I guess quite a lot of music is.<p>I particularly dislike when old intentionally-dynamic music is remastered to be “modernized” into a brick, which is sort of the opposite direction.<p>> Cinema mixes<p>I didn’t know about these, that’s neat! Makes sense that the levels can’t really be the same in my living room as a theater. Is it really a whole separate mix or just some compression in mastering?<p>I really hope that’s not another masterings collection rabbit hole I’m about to fall down haha. I’ll look out for some Dolby certified venues in my area too</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 07:24:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48500937</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48500937</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48500937</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "Vinyl succumbs to Loudness War: more than just collateral damage (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> 1 … they will often chose the more compressed/louder one<p>I’ve always been curious - but presumably that’s true even after volume matching?<p>> 3 Compressed sound works better in noisy environments and as background music<p>I’ve heard this is also why film and video game soundtracks are often very compressed, even when orchestral, because they have to fit in the background with dialog/sfx</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:12:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48498193</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48498193</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48498193</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "Vinyl succumbs to Loudness War: more than just collateral damage (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>ReplayGain is nice - but note it doesn’t ’fix the compression’. Compression and dynamic range is about loud/quiet _within_ the track. ReplayGain just turns the volume up and down for the entire track, the point being so all your tracks play back at about the same level. It saves a preset on the volume knob for you essentially.<p>If you remember making a playlist where one song is suddenly much louder than the last, and you’re riding the volume knob on every other song, you’ll see why this is nice!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48498128</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48498128</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48498128</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "Vinyl succumbs to Loudness War: more than just collateral damage (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It really does on some records, if you’re interested check out some comparisons on YouTube. Many times it’s subtle eq tweaks, granted, and that won’t much matter. But a lot of older rock and pop records for example go from being super dynamic and well produced to completely crushed with boosted bass and treble to ‘modernize’ the sound.<p>You can see some examples of how dynamic range (they don’t track ‘mastering’ overall) varies across releases on this site: <a href="https://dr.loudness-war.info/" rel="nofollow">https://dr.loudness-war.info/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 23:41:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48497928</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48497928</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48497928</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "Vinyl succumbs to Loudness War: more than just collateral damage (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It’s completely true, when the vinyl has a different mastering. It can be a completely different version. It’s not because it’s vinyl</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 19:02:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48494914</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48494914</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48494914</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "Vinyl succumbs to Loudness War: more than just collateral damage (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Short answer, no not really. It won’t ever be as good as a proper uncompressed mastering</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 19:00:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48494886</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48494886</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48494886</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "πFS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And also all the days you don’t, so, by itself not very meaningful. Especially since you can’t tell which one is right in advance. In some sense, so does a calendar</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 20:46:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48482460</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48482460</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48482460</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "Show HN: Rocksky – Music scrobbling and discovery on the AT Protocol"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m running MultiScrobbler to scrobble from multiple sources (Spotify/PlexAmp) to multiple sinks (Last.fm/ListenBrainz/Maloja). Looks like they already support writing to Rocksky!<p><a href="https://github.com/FoxxMD/multi-scrobbler" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/FoxxMD/multi-scrobbler</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 02:06:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165467</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165467</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165467</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "SpaceX files to go public"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They are, but SpaceX is trying to get rules changed. They want the index to buy at a multiple of the float, so they release say 5% but get bought as if they had released 15% float. They also normally wouldn't be eligible for index inclusion for ~1 year, after showing multiple quarters of good stewardship, etc. They're trying to bypass all that</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 22:29:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47607357</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47607357</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47607357</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "I traced my traffic through a home Tailscale exit node"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It has plenty of useful control plane features out of the box. Nothing much you _couldn’t_ do yourself but you don’t have to. Or with Headscale as the self-hosted open-source version</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:01:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595084</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595084</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595084</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "A dot a day keeps the clutter away"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Great system! I wonder what the overall usage distribution is like - presumably some kind of power law shape.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 23:58:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595063</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595063</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595063</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nighthawk454 in "Private equity turned vulnerable elderly people into human ATMs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah, that’s the idea. The loans get bundled up and resold to insurance companies, pension funds, and retail bond investors.<p>Funds are plenty willing to lend other peoples money to get guaranteed dividends and fee payments and not be left holding the risk. Retirement funds are the bag holder - but they won’t realize till later.<p>There’s structural pressure to buy from PE because insurance/pension is designed as fixed payout requiring say 7% yield forever. In a world where investment-grade bonds pay 4% and demographics are shifting from net-inflow to net-outflow, liquidity is _tight_. Meanwhile PE was promising 10% a year or whatever (someone call Madoff…) so that was preferable to the hard conversations of the funds failing. At the cost of kicking the can down to the road and making it worse in the future.<p>If this sounds like 2008 that’s because it is. But bigger and worse, and happening in wayyy more than just mortgages this time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 02:29:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559934</link><dc:creator>nighthawk454</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559934</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559934</guid></item></channel></rss>