<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: ninjahawk1</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ninjahawk1</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 23:53:01 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=ninjahawk1" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New York AI data center fight comes to Geneva]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/2026/08/24/geneva-ai-data-center-greenidge-kristen-gonzalez/91437888007/">https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/2026/08/24/geneva-ai-data-center-greenidge-kristen-gonzalez/91437888007/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49424098">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49424098</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 18:39:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/2026/08/24/geneva-ai-data-center-greenidge-kristen-gonzalez/91437888007/</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49424098</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49424098</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ninjahawk1 in "OpenAI: GPT 5.6 Sol price reduction (until at least Nov 21)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Once they make a model better than Fable I’ll be switching to Codex. Their priorities in terms of consumers seem to be better. I do think Anthropic has some solid safety viewpoints, but I don’t necessarily think that either is entirely aligned yet with delivering exactly what humanity needs. Maybe the AI will help align the AI companies when it gets smart enough. That’s the real misalignment I’m concerned about.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:49:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49421505</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49421505</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49421505</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ninjahawk1 in "How a Texas student blew the whistle on a rogue AI hacking attempt"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don’t think we should allow posting links here that require you the purchase a membership to continue reading. Or at least redirect with an ad block or something through a custom site. That would be rather hacker news of us.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 00:22:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49405135</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49405135</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49405135</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ninjahawk1 in "NanoGPT Speedrun Frontier"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I might’ve missed it, but why was Fable 5 tested on high while Opus 5 was tested on max? Seems like quite a few of them aren’t on the same effort setting as well. Although effort doesn’t really matter anymore since they can change it dynamically, seems like that might be viewed as an experimental error to some.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 00:20:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49405114</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49405114</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49405114</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ninjahawk1 in "NanoGPT Speedrun Frontier"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I misread the graph and genuinely thought you put NanoGPT where Fable is.<p>Lol.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 00:17:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49405096</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49405096</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49405096</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ninjahawk1 in "I like 'em thick: an apology to my English teachers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Asspounding even.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 17:05:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49390991</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49390991</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49390991</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ninjahawk1 in "Aaron Swartz was prosecuted for scraping, while Meta does it without consequence"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree that they should, my point is that it’s difficult for several real logistical reasons. These companies for one do a large amount of lobbying and fundraising for political campaigns, they do control most digital infrastructure, with AI expanding are securing multi trillion dollar datacenter funds, etc.<p>There’s a ton of money at stake for the weathly aristocrats. They push politicians to delay or do things in favor of the companies above the people, and like I already said punishment is hard specifically because how do you fine someone with infinite money? They will just get more.<p>That’s not a punishment. I think that personal liability to the actual CEOs is the only way to get around this, leadership is generally never held responsible which means they can do whatever they want and the company bails out their greedy decisions.<p>It’s late stage capitalism and there’s no clear answer at least from my vantage point. Maybe if plug it into Claude it will give us a more coherent answer.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 17:04:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49390978</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49390978</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49390978</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ninjahawk1 in "Aaron Swartz was prosecuted for scraping, while Meta does it without consequence"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think that large companies having next to no consequences is in large part due to capitalism doing what it does over a long period of time. There’s a deeper and deeper consolidation of money and power the longer time goes on it seems like.<p>If we think back to the various lawsuits Facebook has gone through, they paid out about $10 or so per individual affected, totaling a few hundred million dollars, which they would make in a couple months for selling user data and whatnot.<p>This is something that every company gets away with mainly I think because of just how large their wealth actually is. It’s difficult to actually punish a machine that acts almost like infrastructure. Punishing an individual is easy.<p>I don’t know if there’s really a solution at this point, maybe we could’ve prevented this reality at some point in the past but I don’t think that without actual global collapse it would be something that can be retroactively changed, and I don’t know if global collapse would necessarily lead to a better future.<p>I think that for one, Zuckerberg should be in prison, if someone oversees a massive theft like this, I think they should be held criminally liable. Same the CEOs of Anthropic and OpenAI for their parts in the massive theft that took place. They should all be doing prison time.<p>The reason I don’t think they will is that their investors probably have a good amount of leverage over anyone who would prosecute them, so it would never make it that far.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 22:23:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49381105</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49381105</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49381105</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ninjahawk1 in "I like 'em thick: an apology to my English teachers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The thing about treasure is that you often have to find it for yourself, it can be hard to find, butt when you do find it you get some legendary booty.<p>The thickness of some caves in terms of genuine girth is truly something to marvel at.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 22:14:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49380988</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49380988</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49380988</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ninjahawk1 in "Qwen 3.8 27B is excellent, but it defaults to overthinking things"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It’s a good model but I hope the obliterated version comes out soon. The main way I use open-source models is for doing things that server based models decline, which at the moment is quite a bit of tasks.<p>I find it very ironic how passionate Claude is about not violating copyright while simultaneously Anthropic was sued and lost the lawsuit for illegally pirating millions of books.<p>Lol.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:12:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49330296</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49330296</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49330296</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ninjahawk1 in "Show HN: SwarmSim – Computational simulations of emergent flocking"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Didn’t realize I double posted, I can’t delete it now, if a mod sees this I would prefer this one to be deleted since I left my explanation on the other one. Sorry about that</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 18:29:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49322438</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49322438</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49322438</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ninjahawk1 in "Show HN: SwarmSim – Computational simulations of emergent flocking"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hey guys, this was my senior project for my physics degree at UNCG. I spent 3 months and used Claude Code, available resources, and my professor for any questions I had.<p>I covered three different and specific areas, the first and largest was on emergent flocking in predator/prey dynamics. For instance, how a herd of sheep behave in a seemingly protective way even though any single sheep has no direct plan. For a quick reference, I made an interactive tab you can directly use from the readme where you drag your fingers to control the herd and can change the controls, such as how many predators, number of prey, etc.<p>The final report is linked as well here, with the two other chapters, covering sand piles and earthquakes: <a href="https://nathanlangley.dev/swarmsim/" rel="nofollow">https://nathanlangley.dev/swarmsim/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 18:26:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49322422</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49322422</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49322422</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Show HN: SwarmSim – Computational simulations of emergent flocking]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://github.com/ninjahawk/swarmsim">https://github.com/ninjahawk/swarmsim</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49322337">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49322337</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 18:18:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://github.com/ninjahawk/swarmsim</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49322337</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49322337</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Show HN: SwarmSim – Computational simulations of emergent flocking]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://github.com/ninjahawk/swarmsimj">https://github.com/ninjahawk/swarmsimj</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321098">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321098</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:45:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://github.com/ninjahawk/swarmsimj</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321098</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321098</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ninjahawk1 in "The frontier of GPQA-Dumb models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Current highest ranking model on the GPQA-Dumb benchmark, where the lower the score the higher the score.<p>I encourage you to take a look at the benchmarks, boasting as low a score as 6% in some categories.<p>If anyone thinks they can make a worse model, I challenge you to try.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 07:19:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49165318</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49165318</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49165318</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[The frontier of GPQA-Dumb models]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://github.com/ninjahawk/bongochat">https://github.com/ninjahawk/bongochat</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49165305">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49165305</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 07:17:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://github.com/ninjahawk/bongochat</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49165305</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49165305</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ninjahawk1 in "LLMs reward expertise"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is true for output but as well for learning, if you speak to an LLM trying to get it to give you a certain answer, it’ll find a way to tell you you’re right. If you’re truth seeking and attempting to understand it step by step as it’s going, you’ll likely learn what it’s doing as it’s doing it, meaning you’re basically distilling that information into your own local LLM (also know as the brain).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 05:10:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49164544</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49164544</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49164544</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ninjahawk1 in "How the words we teach English language learners changed"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When I was in high school at a private school, I was surrounded by students who were religious but didn’t have much curiosity. I got into a debate with basically my whole class about how languages shift and change over time, and everyone was saying that languages stay the same and that they were all determined at the Tower of Babel.<p>I used the examples of Latin to Spanish and English, or Old English to new English.<p>I say that to say, languages changing over time is to some people not actually something they believe happens. The facts are right there in front of you, but some people cannot have their minds changed no matter how much sense you make.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 18:03:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49146788</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49146788</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49146788</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ninjahawk1 in "A directory of people who love RSS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>seeing an emoji in a title on HN really surprised me, I didn’t even know you could do that. Shows how much emotion we use on here lol.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 17:19:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49136382</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49136382</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49136382</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Proactive V Reactive; from a Startup Founder's Perspective]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://blog.nathanlangley.dev/posts/proactive-ai.html">https://blog.nathanlangley.dev/posts/proactive-ai.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49130097">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49130097</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 00:49:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://blog.nathanlangley.dev/posts/proactive-ai.html</link><dc:creator>ninjahawk1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49130097</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49130097</guid></item></channel></rss>