2. We can already fix this but for this we need to radically change the power structures that are in place and figure out a way to peacefully solve the problem. Reducing emissions should be the biggest priority everywhere.

Everyone in the oil business knew in the 80ies.

We could probably even figure out how to keep our standard of living but consumerism needs to stop but then capitalism breaks down.

2. That's not how it works. It's more like a greenhouse and climate gases absorb more energy. Also look up after how many meters a steel cable ruptures under it's own weight. It's not exactly easy. Thermonuclear war might help.

On the other hand we are probably almost there - it's English and social media is the global teacher.

Take a look at the early borg papers what problem does it solves. Helm is just insane but you can use jsonnet that is modelled after Google's internal system.

Only use the minimal subset and have an application that is actually build to work fine in that subset.

If you look at birth rates in eastern europe after the fall of the soviet union and the establishment of neoliberal economics everwhere and the development of eastern europe economies as workbenches for western corporations with low wages the birth rates fell and are only slowly recovering now.

Before that - while circumstances where surely not better in a lot of ways - essentials like housing, childcare (kindergarden and so on) where provided and you could be assured to be fine no matter what is going on in your job.

Now you are only fine if you either on welfare and have nothing to loose anyway or earn so much that you can afford everything and risk having children. If you are in between (like most of the population around 20-40 here) it's perceived as a risky gamble.

If you leave the beaten path it tends to break.

It's free and it feels wrong to complain but it's not good software IMHO.

So it's not a model for processing data but rather a hardware hack for having a real lidar - as in real depth data.

You can throw anything you like on it.

Surprisingly the channels that are available work really well if you just use the mpegts stream.

In a past life I've added a few channels to a tvheadend instance on a VPS. It reliable crashed Kodi watching some channels and I've wondered if it's just broken streams or something more interesting is going on.

If you open the ports and watch popular channels it's easily saturating bandwidth - there is no limit.

I've since stopped using it it's the kind of thing that breaks not often enough to be not useless but often enough to be annoying.

It's IPv4 only and seems to use it's own tracker or at least calls to some URLs for initial peer discovery.

Building something similar as true open source would be great but I guess the usecase is mostly illegal streaming.

Be careful - it's attempting to use upnp to open ports on the router and even if just looking through the lists makes you upload fragments.

Still fascinating tool. It's getting to close to what op is looking for but I think it has scalability issues and everything about it is kind of shady and opaque.