<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: nixlaz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=nixlaz</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 10:14:11 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=nixlaz" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nixlaz in "Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Do you mind me asking why you have no fear of OpenAI etc publishing a biology paper? With increasing model capability and compatibility with lab hardware could we not be in a scenario soon(ish) where these agents are able to autonomously complete and publish experimental results?<p>I was debating this with a friend the other day and the consensus we came to was that a highly trained scientist would (or should) always review output like that described above, but that's starting to feel like a weakening argument!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 07:59:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49533207</link><dc:creator>nixlaz</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49533207</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49533207</guid></item></channel></rss>