<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: nluken</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=nluken</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 02:20:24 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=nluken" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I hear this often and it's such a strange view of art, like the only thing that matters is scale and speed. It's a perspective so colored by mechanization that it fails to account for other philosophies in art. Think of what, say the Arts and Crafts movement was all about!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 17:13:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47168899</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47168899</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47168899</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "Simply Scheme: Introducing Computer Science (1999)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Northeastern held out for a long time, only switching away from Racket, despite the protest of students and professors alike, in the last year or two.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 16:29:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46901410</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46901410</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46901410</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "How to turn 'sfo-jfk' into a suitable photo"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The post title here is extremely misleading. Per HN standards, the post should use the original title, "How to turn 'sfo-jfk' into a beautiful photo"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 21:38:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46801943</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46801943</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46801943</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "AI generated music barred from Bandcamp"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Oh! I know this one! You're thinking of Jeffrey Lewis & The Voltage's <i>LPs</i> from 2019: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3urXygZXb74" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3urXygZXb74</a>'</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 22:01:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608895</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608895</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46608895</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "Dude, where's my supersonic jet?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Concorde burned 52% of its fuel just taxiing and taking off<p>and later in the article:<p>> Remember, Concorde burned 52% of its fuel just taxiing down the runway.<p>Setting aside that these are completely different claims, the author does not cite this claim at all and it fails my personal gut check. Where is this information coming from?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 18:50:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46516729</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46516729</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46516729</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "The State of AI Coding Report 2025"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Might be harder to track but what about CFR or some other metric to measure how many bugs are getting through review before versus after the introduction of your product?<p>You might respond that ultimately, developers need to stay in charge of the review process, but tracking that kind of thing reflects how the product is actually getting used. If you can prove it helps to ship <i>features</i> faster as opposed to just allowing more LOC to get past review (these are not the same thing!) then your product has a much stronger demonstrable value.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:29:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46307526</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46307526</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46307526</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "Italy's longest-serving barista reflects on six decades behind the counter"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Despite worries about creeping prices, coffee in Italy averages around €1.20 for an espresso or €1.50 for a cappuccino [1]. Way different than in a major American city.<p>[1]: <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/ccd7ef60-cef2-4b03-b4a4-63fa328546fd" rel="nofollow">https://www.ft.com/content/ccd7ef60-cef2-4b03-b4a4-63fa32854...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 14:38:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46218198</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46218198</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46218198</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "Short Little Difficult Books"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nice little article.<p>Another personal suggestion in this vein: <i>The Queue</i> by Vladimir Sorokin (trans. Sally Laird), which consists entirely of unattributed dialogue. It's challenging at first but once you get a feel for the rhythm and start recognizing characters by how they speak, it becomes a really charming read.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 15:16:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45967338</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45967338</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45967338</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "iPhone Pocket"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Different strokes for different folks. I'm a fashion lover but a fan of cheap cars, and I could equally say something similar about people who drive new luxury cars when there's plenty of reliable functionality to be had under $10k. There's a lot of craftsmanship that goes into nice clothes, and you can get way more expensive than $500. And fashion is a form of art in a way. What makes a painting worth thousands of dollars?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 15:51:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45888725</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45888725</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45888725</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "Solarpunk is happening in Africa"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Keep using that structure. The bots use it so much, and in ways that human authors wouldn't, that it becomes self-parodying. As long as you're not using the same device over and over again in the same piece you'll be fine.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 15:11:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45836131</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45836131</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45836131</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "Solarpunk is happening in Africa"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The giveaway is almost always an over-dependence on "Not 'x' but 'y'" structure. Even when the author changes the wording so that the phrase doesn't read exactly like that, they tend to leave the structure intact, and the bots <i>really</i> like to lead with the inverse of what the author wants to say to create contrast.<p>A human author might have used this technique once to really emphasize a strong point, but today's LLMs use it so often that it loses its emphasis, and instead becomes a distinct stylistic fingerprint.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 21:30:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45828296</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45828296</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45828296</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "Carice TC2 – A non-digital electric car"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Looks a little like a first gen Daihatsu Copen, and I mean that as a complement: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daihatsu_Copen#First_generation_(L880;_2002)" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daihatsu_Copen#First_generatio...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 16:52:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45825060</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45825060</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45825060</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "AI and the Future of American Politics"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> So far, the biggest way Americans have leveraged AI in politics is in self-expression.<p>Most people, in my experience, use LLMs to help them write stuff or just to ask questions. While it might be neat to see the little ways in which some political movements are using new tools to help them do what they were already doing, the real paradigm shifting "use" of LLMs in politics will be generating content to bias the training sets the big companies use to create their models. If you could do that successfully, you would basically have free, 24/7 propaganda bots presenting your viewpoint to millions as a "neutral observer".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 16:46:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45570493</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45570493</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45570493</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "The history of cataract surgery"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>People here are rightly pointing out that there's still room for improvement with this (and almost any) kind of surgery, and the article talks about the accessibility challenges of making procedures like these more widely available, but after reading up on the history of this procedure it's hard not to see modern surgical techniques as a kind of man-made miracle. Great read.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:46:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45450360</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45450360</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45450360</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "Americans Lose Faith That Hard Work Leads to Economic Gains, WSJ-NORC Poll Finds"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> now you are taxed out of success<p>Separate from your inflation argument, aren't income tax levels lower than they used to be, even during the Reagan administration?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 15:52:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45104731</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45104731</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45104731</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "Temporary suspension of acceptance of mail to the United States"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You're not going to get new clothing for TEMU prices without the de minimis exception. In theory, the higher price of these goods will decrease the amount they're purchased and lessen impact of pollution.<p>As others in this thread point out, though, there are other casualties of this change.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 20:40:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45018702</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45018702</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45018702</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "The road that killed Legend Jenkins was working as designed"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It came across more mixed to me. It seemed like he spent the whole article making the case for negligence and then took it back at the end.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:15:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44942277</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44942277</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44942277</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "The road that killed Legend Jenkins was working as designed"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I know what the author is getting at but he frames the article like he agrees with the State charging the parents with involuntary manslaughter, which, barring some detail not included in the linked NYT piece, seems ridiculous to me.<p>The death of a 7 year old is a tragedy. Why do we then need to feel the need to hit bereaved parents with a manslaughter charge? Either there's something missing from the story or we're blaming a systemic issue on individual negligence.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:06:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44942163</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44942163</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44942163</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "GPT-5"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The em dash isn't just the present state of AI slop— it's the future!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 18:37:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44828603</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44828603</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44828603</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nluken in "'70 MPH e-bikes' prompt one US state to change its laws"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> If I could just throttle it up to 35mph, I wouldn't even need bike lanes around town. 45mph, and I could easily get to the next town over.<p>The "higher class" of which you speak has existed for a long time, albeit usually fulfilled by gas powered vehicles until recently: <a href="https://www.vespa.com/us_EN/models/primavera/primavera-50-4s3v-2024/" rel="nofollow">https://www.vespa.com/us_EN/models/primavera/primavera-50-4s...</a><p>There's a reason why we require license, registration, and insurance to operate mopeds but not bicycles. You're far more dangerous to pedestrians, other cyclists, and yourself at these kinds of speeds.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 17:34:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44737143</link><dc:creator>nluken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44737143</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44737143</guid></item></channel></rss>