<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: nonethewiser</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=nonethewiser</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 08:47:44 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=nonethewiser" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "US Government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Have never heard of it, thanks for the info</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 02:04:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48511805</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48511805</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48511805</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Which models? Im curious what kind of more specific hypothesis you're willing to put forth. Anthropic going to lose 20-30-40-50% of users to Deepseek? What?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 01:39:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48511536</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48511536</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48511536</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Learn to center a div<p>Copy and paste code from stack overflow until the div is centered<p>Ask AI to center it</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 03:01:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48499380</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48499380</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48499380</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "If you are asking for human attention, demonstrate human effort"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Instinctively I think the move is to ignore it. I guess that would look different in different contexts.<p>Obviously you have to communicate with your coworkers. But I think the solution has to essential be: "Im not going to read that."</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:02:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48498105</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48498105</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48498105</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "Cybersecurity researchers aren't happy about the guardrails on Anthropic's Fable"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No.<p>B + C = A<p>B is finite<p>C is infinite<p>Therefor A is infinite</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 23:57:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48498060</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48498060</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48498060</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "OpenAI's June 2026 Report on Malicious Uses of AI [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Im glad OpenAI is publishing this sort of thing. This report is fascinating to read because it is so transparent - showing literal queries, images generated, etc. In the never ending, multifaceted tug of war (red/blue/anti-ai/anti-openai/anti-nuclear etc.) we have somehow lost sight of obvious facts like "its bad for foreign adversaries to operate influence campaigns." It's good for OpenAI to be transparent about this. It doesnt need a crazy conspiracy theory to explain it.<p>I think Americans in particular need to realize the discussion they are reading online is conducted by people that largely do not have America's best interests in mind - whether they just dont have a stake or they are actively working against it. This is not 2008 when Reddit was 80% Americans.<p>My point is not that we should all rally as a tribe or something. My point is Americans should stop assuming people engaging in discussion online are hoping America prospers. I single out the US because its a large part of the English speaking internet and used to be a majority group where this assumption was pretty fair. Online discussion spaces have become a lot more diverse over the past decade.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 21:51:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48496922</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48496922</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48496922</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "Waymo Premier"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Oh I missed that. Thanks for clarifying.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 20:17:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48495852</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48495852</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48495852</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "Waymo Premier"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Can someone help me put this into context?<p>$30/month is way cheaper than $104/month.<p>How would you compare the base metrics?<p>Time to start traveling, average walk amount per trip, total trip duration, coverage parity, etc.<p>I suspect you can get into a waymo quicker and with less walking than a subway, unless you live very close. I imagine total trip time is pretty variable. Coverage parity is hard to guess about - in theory a waymo can go anywhere but I suspect public transport has longer "tendrils."</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 19:17:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48495117</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48495117</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48495117</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "US Consumer Price Index up 4.2%"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah but I'm not arguing it's never necessary to change the weights.<p>Im saying if steak is in the index and it doubles in price the index should go up (all else being equal).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:50:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48494777</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48494777</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48494777</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "Ask HN: How do you get into a flow state when using AI to code?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I never really got into flow state from planning. Too much brain power, dead ends, etc. I reached flow state from the "busy work." Knowing what needed to be built and implementing it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 16:53:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48492884</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48492884</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48492884</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "Ask HN: How do you get into a flow state when using AI to code?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This sounds good except when you need to cross multiple files. I feel like a significant part of the value of AI is that it can just find things instantly instead of me having to navigate some menu or enter any commands. At least in my experience changing 1 thing requires traversing a large slice.<p>I guess to take it a step further you could just write everything in a single file with enough context to let the LLM figure out location but this is quite literally just a prompt.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 16:52:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48492865</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48492865</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48492865</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "Cybersecurity researchers aren't happy about the guardrails on Anthropic's Fable"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sorry but that’s not the claim. The claim is wikipedia can return the same information. Please find me a migration script given my current db schema and new target schema.<p>The claim is absurd.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 12:40:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48489553</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48489553</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48489553</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "Cybersecurity researchers aren't happy about the guardrails on Anthropic's Fable"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No, of the model <i>always</i> refuses to output then it’s finite</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 12:38:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48489530</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48489530</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48489530</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "Cybersecurity researchers aren't happy about the guardrails on Anthropic's Fable"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>I'd be surprised if anyone can get any output from it that couldn't easily be replaced with a search from wikipedia.<p>I dont understand. This is just hyperbole right? The outputs are basically infinite and wikipedia most certainly isnt infinite.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 01:12:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48485052</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48485052</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48485052</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "US Consumer Price Index up 4.2%"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Together with the jobs numbers, it would be weird for an independent Fed to not raise rates.<p>Not really. They may believe the inflation is driven by supply shocks, not excess demand. For example, the oil blockade. Raising already restrictive rates wont increase the supply of oil.<p>They don't even need to be right. If they simply believe this is what's driving inflation, they could decline to raise rates without that necessarily indicating a lack of independence.<p>Personally I expect the FED not to be independent and to let inflation run a little hot while lowering rates to attack the debt from 2 angles. But even still, its not true that high CPI + not lowering rates = non-independent fed</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 19:02:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48481071</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48481071</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48481071</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "US Consumer Price Index up 4.2%"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah it's been gamed for a long time. Did you know teh inflation metric can actually go down when staples it tracks goes up?<p>Yup.<p>If steak is tracked and it doubles in price, they can adjust the basket weights to reflect what they assume consumers will do: buy less beef and more chicken instead. So if Q1 steak=10 and Q2 steak=20 they might change the weights so that it's essential comparing Q1 steak to Q2 chicken. Which may be cheaper than Q1 steak, thus reducing inflation despite steak doubling in price.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 18:10:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48480338</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48480338</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48480338</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "US Consumer Price Index up 4.2%"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hacker news moment</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 18:07:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48480286</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48480286</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48480286</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "Building an HTML-first site doubled our users overnight"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah but for those not using £20 phones from Tesco, where is the disrespect?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:49:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48478170</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48478170</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48478170</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "German ruling declares Google liable for false answers in AI Overviews"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah, but my point is: what does that have to do with monopolies changing their services?<p>And to continue your thought, what does that imply about copyright of training data? If Google is authoring the output it seems harder to argue they are ripping someone else off.<p>It really seems like a tightrope to say google is publishing their own opinion but their opinion is also just someone else's work.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:48:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48478154</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48478154</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48478154</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nonethewiser in "German ruling declares Google liable for false answers in AI Overviews"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And doesnt this imply they arent ripping off the underlying information?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:10:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48477541</link><dc:creator>nonethewiser</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48477541</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48477541</guid></item></channel></rss>