If nuclear would be cheap in the western world I'd be all for it but we just can't do large projects in our ccurrent system.

Solar + wind + battery is much less of an headache.

Using a browser in an air gapped environment is so much more pain than it should be.

I used something like this on a large sheet and cut it into pieces for a puzzle gift to a website where people left comments. Nowadays even easier to generate nice temporary websites for such things.

Energy heavy use cases with little to no energy costs will lap western industries.

That's how you sound.

Basically you can prove that you have an identification document and that a certain property is true without revealing anything else.

But that is only reserved for the big players I guess.

Or another Gigawatt solar + batteries this year.

There are deserts everywhere.

Is your solution to look in the past and blame everyone to solve the problems today?

Of course in Hindsight phasing out nuclear so fast was a mistake. Does that solve our problems now?

I don't like the assumption that this calculation was not done by the book due to the greens being in charge of that. It's always the question: Lifetime extension can cost a lot and maybe it only buys 5 years. Basically I assume there was a € price and it was too high to pay. Maybe CDU would've payed that price but I don't think either is wrong.

Tell me please how building nuclear plants today will solve our problems in the 15-20 years it takes to build them.

Or how the conservative party did phase out nuclear? They were 16 years at the helm, why couldn't they stop it?

But no the fringe party is at fault for everything. That rhetoric is both completely unfounded and basically far-right propaganda. Congratulations - you got targeted and manipulated into a single issue voter.

You come off as very militant in that sense.