Is being forced to die for motherland vs have an option not to = "mostly" consistent? You're delusional.

My population suffers either way and losing a war to a dictatorship while being a dictatorship doesnt change much.

Ukraine doesn't have allies. If it did, they'd be at war with Russia too.

> Most people decided millennia ago that man and woman have different duties in war times

Guess what, their decisions weren't limited by war times. Men and women had different duties in family, in communities, in positions of power, etc. And they had different rights then too, btw.

> Why is it, that you have to bring up all these unrelated topics like patriarchy, privileges and nazism?

Dude, you have no idea what you're talking about.

This division of duties IS called a patriarchal system, where men lead and women follow. YOU are trying to defend it, not me.

> People tend to have an attachment to the place where they live or have been born or with the people they live with.

Is that the reason they fled the country and want to move elsewhere and are now forced to go back? Interesting logic.

> That is a privilege, no?

Yes, that is a privilege men don't have. That's inequality by definition.

> As i said, women have different responsibilities in wartime.

I don't see women being forced out back to Ukraine to their responsibilities, though. Do you?

> Or do you suggest to conscript women and send them to the front instead?

I suggest consistency. If they claim to aim for equality, that's the logical step. And not "instead" but along with men. If they think women should have different responsibilities, then please be consistent and force them to commit to their responsibilities (what are they though?).

I just like it when governments try to be consistent with their policies. Equal rights? That's great, but then why men all of a sudden have more duties? If they do, they should have more privileges then. That's consistent and honest.

Or, if you decide that men have duties that women don't, let's get back to the patriarchy and give the men the privileges they fight for (or have to fight for in case of a war).

It's coming from the fact that troops approaching Kyiv were supplied with 3 day rations and full dress uniforms, ready to hold a parade in Kyiv. It's also coming from US intelligence (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2022/russia...). And on top of that, russian propaganda literally repeated times and times again that this war will last for 3-4 days.

> Putin was raised in the KGB, I think he knows a bit how to get intel

Are you saying he planned for 5 years of war and russian economy being destroyed and also planned for over a million casualties for his army?

> underestimating the will of the ukrainians to hold their ground in the beginning of the war

There you go, you just said it yourself. That's the "insight".

What's changed is this ability is now easily accessible.

Is it all automated?

They're literally a contractor and consultant to russian military.

https://informnapalm.org/en/alabugaleaks-part-2-kaspersky-la...

If you do just a quick check of what this guy wrote, you'll see he isn't just "a critic".

His Ukraine-related articles are the real litmus test. He's literally spewing the russian propaganda nonsense.

His writing tone is "60s soviet propaganda" and the arguments are shallow and insubstantial, to say the least.

upd. Just checked his other articles. Yup, dude is a russian shill.