<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: notpachet</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=notpachet</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 19:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=notpachet" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "The Decoherence Trap"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> The central argument is that AIs, living inside datacenters, won't be able to evaluate the "coherence" of software "beyond the human ceiling"<p>Actually, the article states that AI will easily be able to handle increases beyond the human ceiling as long as those increases follow a linear curve, not an exponential curve.<p>So your whole critique dissolves. Sorry!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:39:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50179913</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50179913</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50179913</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "The 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement is no longer viable"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You're tying together some pretty far-flung strands of argument there.<p>Regarding children and selfishness: some of the most selfish people I know have kids. They're selfish in the sense that they only care about their family, even to the detriment of everyone else.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:32:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50179841</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50179841</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50179841</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "QGIS bans AI assisted contributions"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> - Any (super)intelligence caches work
> - Any (super)intelligence _wants to create stable abstractions_<p>This is a higher-order rephrasing of the "intelligence is compression" argument.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:34:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50056255</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50056255</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50056255</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "The Mathocalypse"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"What I cannot create, I do not understand"<p>- Feynman</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:42:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000654</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000654</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000654</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "How much oil-market buffer is left?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Let's be better please.<p>That rhetorical horse left the allegorical barn a long time ago.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 01:50:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49721224</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49721224</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49721224</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "Watch AI materials-science and bioscience abilities closely"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> if you can do the worst “bad” thing possible, you can also do the best “good” thing possible<p>You say this like it's a truism, but I don't think it is. The bad things may be categorically easier than the good things. It's easier to destabilize a delicate system than to stabilize it. It's easier to break something than to fix it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 13:27:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49696508</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49696508</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49696508</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "Fable 5.1 Solves the Cyphral Distich, a 370-year-old cipher"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I did bother to read it, and that isn't what I meant. I wasn't referring to one-off errors that you can fix <i>after</i> successfully decoding a cipher into something that produces a majority-correct answer. I meant something more akin to what schoen's answer touched on: whether there are any closed-form mathematical/statistical analyses that can be performed ahead of time to assess the structural legitimacy of any ciphertext before you spend a lot of cycles trying to decode it.<p>Thanks for the driveby snark though!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 11:06:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49694915</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49694915</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49694915</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "Fable 5.1 Solves the Cyphral Distich, a 370-year-old cipher"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's pretty good.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 01:55:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49690917</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49690917</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49690917</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "Fable 5.1 Solves the Cyphral Distich, a 370-year-old cipher"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> It spun for 52 seconds so maybe some Python was involved.<p>Come for the AI doom, stay for the programming languages (remember those?) catching strays</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 00:06:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49690133</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49690133</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49690133</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "Fable 5.1 Solves the Cyphral Distich, a 370-year-old cipher"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Cipher noob question: is there any check that can be done to ensure a cipher is actually decodable? What if the author made a flaw when encoding it, so that it's not actually solvable?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 23:49:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49690007</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49690007</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49690007</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "Feeling Sad about AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"My dosimeter only reads 3.6 roentgen / hour!"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 19:54:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49664431</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49664431</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49664431</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "Feeling Sad about AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not the parent, but pointing out a couple of problems in your analysis:<p>First, arctic temperatures: this is a widely misunderstood point. Notice that in the graph, the non-summer months are noticeably warmer. The summer months are going to be effectively capped at around 0 degrees until all the ice is gone, so holding up this graph and saying "look, the temperature never got above freezing!" is misleading, because the "warming" is actually happening as a function of melting ice, not air temperature.<p>Sea ice extent: the last 18 years were the lowest 18 minimums on record. Also, ice extent != ice volume. March 2026 recorded a record-low ice volume. An extent chart reads the same regardless of whether the underlying ice is thin or thick.<p>Greenland mass balance: here you're just plain wrong. You linked to the <i>surface</i> mass balance page, in other words, snowfall minus surface melt + runoff. This does not account for glacial calving and basal melt. The page you linked says this directly. <i>Total</i> mass balance is a grimmer picture: an average loss of about 252 km³ of water per year over 2003-2025, contributing 0.69 mm/yr to sea level rise.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 19:40:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49664241</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49664241</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49664241</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "Feeling Sad about AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's a mythological story about the hubris of flying; I'm sure Claude can pull it up for you.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 18:30:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49663057</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49663057</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49663057</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "Feeling Sad about AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Moreover who’s actually getting exterminated?<p>The species whose value was questionable.<p>The good ones remain.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 18:20:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49662937</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49662937</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49662937</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "Feeling Sad about AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's a larger existential crisis still in store for you. Our global civilization is collapsing. We are choking to death on the unchecked negative externalities of our own progress. It is our species' Achilles heel. Whether or not an individual developer adapts to this temporary capability blip (agentic coding) will not matter in the long run. The systems necessary for supporting these capabilities are too brittle to survive the century.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 17:58:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49662553</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49662553</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49662553</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "Detecting and countering misuse of AI: September 2026"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Instead we just get good, hard slop</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 01:03:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49652250</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49652250</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49652250</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "iPhone Duo"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Because they're addicted to online content consumption. See also: sports betting, cigarettes, fast food.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 12:49:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49642899</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49642899</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49642899</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "Flock Wants a Closely Surveilled World with No Exit"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> the way they'd go after a very inconvenient activist<p>FTFY</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 12:44:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49625640</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49625640</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49625640</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "Ask HN: Why were OpenAI, Claude, and Grok simultaneously down?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Related reading:<p>The Waluigi Effect: After you train an LLM to satisfy a desirable property, then it's easier to elicit the chatbot into satisfying the exact opposite property.<p><a href="https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/D7PumeYTDPfBTp3i7/the-waluigi-effect-mega-post" rel="nofollow">https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/D7PumeYTDPfBTp3i7/the-waluig...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 16:06:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49552312</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49552312</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49552312</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by notpachet in "The Post-AI Internet Doesn't Look Great"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You've hit on something important, and it's real, not cosmetic.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49541802</link><dc:creator>notpachet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49541802</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49541802</guid></item></channel></rss>