<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: nuclearnice1</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=nuclearnice1</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 18:14:10 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=nuclearnice1" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "You are what you read, even if you don't always remember it"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>polyptoton?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:44:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40156248</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40156248</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40156248</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "The death of the 60/40 portfolio"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks for the great video on international diversification.<p>I noticed he has another on the related topic of bias toward investing in one’s home
country.<p><a href="https://youtu.be/qYedjI03Q0g?si=-wOqSA96cmScFInq" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/qYedjI03Q0g?si=-wOqSA96cmScFInq</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:54:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40143277</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40143277</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40143277</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "The death of the 60/40 portfolio"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A slight over simplification, for example s&p was negative 1% per year from Jan 2000 to Dec 2009. Plus the cost of your leverage.<p>But the general point that US equity returns have been good and leverage would have increased them stands.<p>For some reason, Americans are “told” to get 4x leveraged to the real estate market but to pay for their equities with 100% cash.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:16:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40136007</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40136007</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40136007</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "Digital forgeries are hard"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Interesting. I did not know about this case.<p>We had a similar thing in Pakistan. In fact, same font.<p><a href="https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/pakistan/how-calibri-font-brought-down-the-nawaz-sharif-government-1.2065614" rel="nofollow">https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/pakistan/how-calibri-font-br...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 01:36:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39711207</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39711207</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39711207</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "Which word begins with "y" and looks like an axe in this picture? (2017)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Be sure to read that link with  showdead.<p>thedrake’s victorious final comment “ SOLVED!!!!!! I spent several hours looking for an axe or a hatchet or an Ubåt…” is dead.<p>Possibly because of a heuristic aimed at killing spam posts with too many links.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 01:48:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39036468</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39036468</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39036468</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "What Happened to GE? (2021)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Great points. It depends on how confident you are in the claim that the primary purpose was “artificially boost quarterly profits.” No particular evidence presented in the excerpt.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2024 13:44:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39013182</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39013182</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39013182</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "What Happened to GE? (2021)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> For example, Gryta and Mann report that GE would sometimes artificially boost quarterly profits by selling an asset (e.g., a diesel train) to a friendly bank, knowing that it could then buy back the asset at a time of GE’s choosing.<p>So fraud?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 23:11:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39007308</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39007308</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39007308</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "Gameboy technical reference for homebrew developers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You did a beautiful job and you should be proud of it. Both the information and the aesthetics are a treat.<p>Can I ask what technology stack you used? For the images, the animations, and the voice over?<p>I’d like to be able to do something like this.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2023 17:22:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38395086</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38395086</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38395086</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "Why is Y Combinator so defensive lately?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Exactly. Almost as much fun as when Garry wanted to take our money to keep him rich: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35118988">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35118988</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 01:53:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37592378</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37592378</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37592378</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "The new science of meditation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Interesting point. There are obvious connections from
the Yamas to the eight-fold path of Buddhism: Right View, Right Resolve, Right Speech, Right Action, Right Livelihood, Right Effort, Right Mindfulness, and Right Concentration.<p>I’m not aware of an explicit ordering. But the other seven steps complement and deepen the meditation.<p><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_Eightfold_Path" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_Eightfold_Path</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 16:17:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37224870</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37224870</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37224870</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "Paul Graham on Conversations with Tyler"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You may be interested in Terry Tao’s polymath collaborations.<p><a href="https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2018/01/24/polymath-proposal-upper-bounding-the-de-bruijn-newman-constant/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2018/01/24/polymath-proposal-...</a><p>> As for upper bounds, de Bruijn showed back in 1950 that {\Lambda \leq 1/2}. The only progress since then has been the work of Ki, Kim and Lee in 2009, who improved this slightly to {\Lambda < 1/2}. The primary proposed aim of this Polymath project is to obtain further explicit improvements to the upper bound of {\Lambda}. Of course, if we could lower the upper bound all the way to zero, this would solve the Riemann hypothesis, but I do not view this as a realistic outcome of this project<p>To your point, there was some excitement and progress in the beginning, but it remains an unusual approach to mathematics.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2023 03:16:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37071507</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37071507</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37071507</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "A collection of quant riddles with answers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ha. Right. I guess it’s just one more way in which the interview is an anti pattern for the behavior we want in a coworker.<p>Can I Google this? <i>Sorry no.</i><p>ChapGPT? <i>Pretend it’s not available.</i><p>Use a library? <i>No no no.</i><p>Ask for help? <i>Thanks for coming in.</i></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2023 13:36:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37011880</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37011880</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37011880</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "A collection of quant riddles with answers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Generally, if you find a simplification that makes the problem trivial you’re interpreting it wrong and should reconsider.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 13:07:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36999444</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36999444</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36999444</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "Mark Watson's Lisp books"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You may enjoy this old book.<p><a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/onlisptext.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.paulgraham.com/onlisptext.html</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 17:09:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36881118</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36881118</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36881118</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "The Deliberate Practice Guide (2021)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Great point.<p>Code review gives some commentary on result, but process wise it’s a solitary activity.<p>Perhaps this was some of the benefit of the mostly abandoned practice of pair programming?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 18:29:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36330406</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36330406</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36330406</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "The Deliberate Practice Guide (2021)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree coding is a great discipline for both deep work and deliberate practice.<p>I would draw a distinction between the two. Deep work is about achieving the focus and attention to do serious work. Deliberate practice is about the motivation and effort to focus on improving your skill set.<p>You probably know this from Cal Newport’s excellent book, but for others. Two great but distinct mental tools to add to your kit.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 12:43:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36325033</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36325033</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36325033</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think your point about law breaking is good. Facebook, Uber, AirBnB. Too much law breaking in the name of innovation.<p>I intended to make a narrower more trivial observation that innovation produces winners and losers. Innovation is just competition.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 19:15:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35820677</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35820677</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35820677</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I like your optimism.<p>The article points out they were previously hit a few privacy issues. There was an FTC order in 2012 which the FTC claimed Facebook violated with in months. So they got a 2019 order encouraging them to follow the 2012 order. Now this order encourages them to follow the 2019 and 2012 orders.<p>My personal view is these enforcements would be more effective if they hit the management of the corporations rather than the shareholders.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 16:13:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35817782</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35817782</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35817782</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Probably too simplistic.<p>Innovation serves some and “disrupts” others.<p>Uber might be a handy ride for you. A NYC cabbie who is in debt for his medallion might see it the opposite.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 15:54:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35817437</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35817437</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35817437</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nuclearnice1 in "State of Private Markets: Q1 2023"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The article disagrees. But my sense is you are right in relative terms. Much more failing than acquiring.<p>Article:<p>> Startup M&A bounced back: The number of venture-backed companies that were acquired or merged with another company increased by 20% in Q1 compared to Q4 2022, with 57% of those M&A deals valued at $10 million or less.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 16:48:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35804604</link><dc:creator>nuclearnice1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35804604</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35804604</guid></item></channel></rss>