<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: nullpwr</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=nullpwr</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 18:59:06 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=nullpwr" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nullpwr in "Everything in C is undefined behavior"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> The language should not let you create an an invalid pointer, or at least warn you when you are doing so<p>completely agree!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 12:50:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48206847</link><dc:creator>nullpwr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48206847</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48206847</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nullpwr in "Everything in C is undefined behavior"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Excellent post. But it's addressed to the wrong people.<p>The problem lies with compilers, not with the language and its specification, or with the creators of the C programming language.<p>Anyone can write a compiler that transforms all undefined behaviors (UB) into defined behaviors (DB). And your compiler will be used by people, including me.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 12:09:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48206411</link><dc:creator>nullpwr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48206411</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48206411</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nullpwr in "GitHub Compromised"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ok. Copy that. tnx</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 06:33:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48203883</link><dc:creator>nullpwr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48203883</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48203883</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by nullpwr in "GitHub is investigating unauthorized access to their internal repositories"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm not sure if this is related or not. But a few days ago, I saw commits from the "future tense" in some repositories. When you read "committed tomorrow" after a commit, it's not funny at all. I posted a screenshot in the announcement on GitHub.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 06:23:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48203804</link><dc:creator>nullpwr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48203804</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48203804</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Secure Boot Certificate Expiry (Windows and Linux)]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AwzaZmRNsI">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AwzaZmRNsI</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48191268">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48191268</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 09:46:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AwzaZmRNsI</link><dc:creator>nullpwr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48191268</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48191268</guid></item></channel></rss>